BJS is garbage!
He has let me down in every fight I've seen him in and his last 2 fights were disasters.
I'd take a Eubank win all day!
Printable View
BJS is garbage!
He has let me down in every fight I've seen him in and his last 2 fights were disasters.
I'd take a Eubank win all day!
Eubanks has been fighting at super middle but I guess he could campaign at middle when he gets started with his career. He is just playing at the moment. He will definitely be a world champion now. :)
How much money did you lose.;DQuote:
Originally Posted by Vendettos
Don't you start betting, if you lose we will never here the end of it captain careful.;DQuote:
Originally Posted by Master
OK I was being safe, he will be undisputed middleweight champion of the world.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dia bandoDon't you start betting, if you lose we will never here the end of it captain careful.;DQuote:
Originally Posted by Master
I won on his last fight, but it was shit to watch lol.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dia bandoHow much money did you lose.;DQuote:
Originally Posted by Vendettos
I think Ryder beats BJS and Chris Jr. What I will say is fair play to Billy for the fights hes taking. Spike O Sullivan followed by Ryder. If he wins both of them it puts him in the mix as one of the best in Britain and will deserve a shot at any of the top 3.
I know it doesnt mean much but Macklin has never fought an unbeaten fight, Barker only has one and Murray 3 or 4. Billy has 1 with 2 more coming this year.
Unbeaten means nothing.Quote:
Originally Posted by Silkeyjoe
Barker and Macklin have both fought Martinez who wasn't undefeated, and is better than half the young undefeated fighters around.
I know that but Im just saying apart from the guys Barker, Macklin and Murray have lost too, they havent fought anyone that good. Look at Barkerts record, his best names are Kerry Hopeless and Danny Butler. Martin Murrays opponents have been extremely poor bar Sturm. Macklin has a few better with Alcine and Asikainen but still nothing too special. Ryder is probably as good as anyone the above 3 have beatenQuote:
Originally Posted by VendettosUnbeaten means nothing.Quote:
Originally Posted by Silkeyjoe
Barker and Macklin have both fought Martinez who wasn't undefeated, and is better than half the young undefeated fighters around.
I feel you may be putting him ahead of where he is career wise.Quote:
Originally Posted by SilkeyjoeI know that but Im just saying apart from the guys Barker, Macklin and Murray have lost too, they havent fought anyone that good. Look at Barkerts record, his best names are Kerry Hopeless and Danny Butler. Martin Murrays opponents have been extremely poor bar Sturm. Macklin has a few better with Alcine and Asikainen but still nothing too special. Ryder is probably as good as anyone the above 3 have beatenQuote:
Originally Posted by VendettosUnbeaten means nothing.Quote:
Originally Posted by Silkeyjoe
Barker and Macklin have both fought Martinez who wasn't undefeated, and is better than half the young undefeated fighters around.
Ryder fought only 1 very average person in Eamon Okane and that was the only fighter he has fought that was unbeaten.
It was an Impressive win as I thought Okane would KO him.
I think you need to give him a few more fights before you can compare them all together mate.
Barker, Macklin and Murray all destroy him right now, maybe 5 or 6 more fights. He'll be British champion if he wins his next 2 and then a few defenses and a European shot and then it'll be fair to compare.
I agree. I'm saying there's potential. But I'm just saying that I think he beats anyone that the 3 big names have beat.Quote:
Originally Posted by VendettosI feel you may be putting him ahead of where he is career wise.Quote:
Originally Posted by SilkeyjoeI know that but Im just saying apart from the guys Barker, Macklin and Murray have lost too, they havent fought anyone that good. Look at Barkerts record, his best names are Kerry Hopeless and Danny Butler. Martin Murrays opponents have been extremely poor bar Sturm. Macklin has a few better with Alcine and Asikainen but still nothing too special. Ryder is probably as good as anyone the above 3 have beatenQuote:
Originally Posted by VendettosUnbeaten means nothing.Quote:
Originally Posted by Silkeyjoe
Barker and Macklin have both fought Martinez who wasn't undefeated, and is better than half the young undefeated fighters around.
Ryder fought only 1 very average person in Eamon Okane and that was the only fighter he has fought that was unbeaten.
It was an Impressive win as I thought Okane would KO him.
I think you need to give him a few more fights before you can compare them all together mate.
Barker, Macklin and Murray all destroy him right now, maybe 5 or 6 more fights. He'll be British champion if he wins his next 2 and then a few defenses and a European shot and then it'll be fair to compare.
What type of Brit is fucking called 'Billy Joe' anyway?!...
He's a pikey mate.Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamGB