Printable View
Yeah that was hands down one of the worse scorecards I've ever seen. If you think about it though, this is Abraham Lincoln's fault. He one of the first in favour of giving women the vote, and now years later look what happened? You can't let them make decisions, their smaller brains cannot cope with it.
I don't think judges should even be aloud to sit ringside. They would have a better view if they were watching it on a monitor in a quiet room, were they can't get swayed by the noise of the crowd and in between rounds have the option to watch a replay if they need it. I know judging has always has bad scores but it does seem as if its happening far too much lately.
They need to do something and I'm a big proponent of taking these people away from the ring and giving them the same advantages that we the viewing public has. Starting off with no blind spots. I'm all for sound proof booths somewhere else in the building. Its not like bad cards are rare.Quote:
Originally Posted by g3org3
Next they should do a power point presentation using cartoon characters if necessary and go through the finer points of the ten point must system. They ought to do the effective aggression aspect in slow motion in order to show the difference between what is aggression and what is effective aggression. They should then do a mock fight as a final exam and if you dont get that right then you dont pass. You simply go down the hall and start training as a bus driver.
Just saw the fight. That judge should not be judging any more fights ever again. Either corrupt on incompetent (which is worse). She also somehow scored for Bradley against PAC.
Either I'm a complete idiot who never understood boxing anyway, or that judge should not be in that job
By the way, the question was rhetorical, so please don't all come back confirming my idiocy