Re: Why its stupid to say that Klitschkos beat Marciano ---
Quote:
Really we should be asking how he would have done against guys like Bob Foster, Dariusz the Tiger, Roy Jones, Michael Spinks, ect.
He has wins over 2 of the great LHW's in Archie Moore and Ezzard Charles.
This! That is correct, when we appraise Marciano today we should assess his performance against the cruisers of today or the LHW division. I think too that Rocky would strip to a LHW were he around today.
To compare him to the heavyweights- is totally not fair to today's heavies, not fair to Marciano, but it's also not fair to the cruisers and light heavies today who are dismissed against such an opponent whom they really deserve to be rated with.
Brocktonblockbust has in fact started this thread with exactly my point of view... It doesn't make sense to rate Marciano against the HW's of today. It really is a different class now.
Re: Why its stupid to say that Klitschkos beat Marciano ---
I'd love to see Roy Jones vs Marciano at 175, prime for prime.
We talk about Rocky's power at heavyweight, but imagine if he could hold his power cutting to 175. He would kill guys.
Re: Why its stupid to say that Klitschkos beat Marciano ---
I agree. And now you can get a true appreciation of just how menacing Rocky really was! :)