anyone has a shot against anyone, first of all and foremost. ANYONE.
Next, nobody is beaitng a prime Ali/Holmes/Louis, no way, no how.
Printable View
anyone has a shot against anyone, first of all and foremost. ANYONE.
Next, nobody is beaitng a prime Ali/Holmes/Louis, no way, no how.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ykdadamaja
Ah, so you feel the need to cheat the comparison by using their primes and comparing it against Wlad when Wlad wasn't in his prime. In other words you think Wlad is really good or else you wouldn't need to stack the deck. Got it.
When Wlad got whacked he was in his prime... in fact, Wlad, now, is four years past his prime and physical peak. Wlad is getting by on skill in beating bums and with skill on playing boxing politics.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron SwansonQuote:
Originally Posted by ykdadamaja
Ah, so you feel the need to cheat the comparison by using their primes and comparing it against Wlad when Wlad wasn't in his prime. In other words you think Wlad is really good or else you wouldn't need to stack the deck. Got it.
Wlad's latter end of his career has been orchestrated due to boxing politics.
Tyson lost to Williams and McBride, Ali lost to Berbeck and Spinks, Lewis lost to Rahman and McCall as did Holmes and Louis lost to Schmelling. I dont see Wlad losing to any of them in his prime which has been the past 10 years not the Wlad who lost earlier in his careerQuote:
Originally Posted by ykdadamaja