Re: Quite angry about Ebola coverage
I was thinking about it the other day and for some reason bird shit popped into my mind. I got to thinking it could be transferred by bird shit getting into the water or onto the flour or seeds before bread making cause out there carrion birds eat some dead stuff with some horrible diseases in them so its possible something goes right through :-\.
The shit I think of :rolleyes:.
Re: Quite angry about Ebola coverage
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gandalf
It is a terrible looking disease and I am only surprised that they haven't blamed Putin yet
Are you on Putin's payroll lol ;D
Re: Quite angry about Ebola coverage
I heard on the radio this morning that the doctor and the aid worker that have caught the virus are being flown to Atlanta for treatment, or so they can die closer to home, realistically. They say the chance of the virus escaping is slight but I don't think that is a chance I would take. Honestly, it makes no sense to me at all.
Re: Quite angry about Ebola coverage
Quote:
Originally Posted by
greynotsoold
I heard on the radio this morning that the doctor and the aid worker that have caught the virus are being flown to Atlanta for treatment, or so they can die closer to home, realistically. They say the chance of the virus escaping is slight but I don't think that is a chance I would take. Honestly, it makes no sense to me at all.
Well from what I understand it's a heavier virus that isn't transmittable through air, only close contact, so I guess making sure it doesn't spread will be relatively easy. Also I think those infected still have a 20-30% chance of surviving so I guess they have to do everything possible.
But I agree even if it is "safe" it's a scary idea transporting that shit over here.
Re: Quite angry about Ebola coverage
You never know they may find the cure bringing them closer to home too. Radiate them or something like that, stuff they cant do or try out in the back blocks of Africa. You never know your luck. I think they should put people down at a certain stage of some diseases, this one tops the bill nice big wack of Morph.
Re: Quite angry about Ebola coverage
It's f*<ked !
Why the f*<k would the american authorities take people on death's door that are infected with a deadly incurable disease, and then fly them across the ocean, bringing this deadly virus to the Americas?!
It makes no f*<king sense whatsoever.:o
People are idiots....
Re: Quite angry about Ebola coverage
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanflicker
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gandalf
It is a terrible looking disease and I am only surprised that they haven't blamed Putin yet
Are you on Putin's payroll lol ;D
No.
People should get into survival mode though. Buy your long life foods, stock up on medicine, and get ready. If it isn't the collapse or war, it could be the plague. With the hyper madness, I have no doubt that aliens will be here next month.
Re: Quite angry about Ebola coverage
And just the other day Mt. Sinai Hospital tested a few patients for......anyone care to guess?
EBOLA!
Hooray!
Also the CDC says we have nothing to fear. Just like we had nothing to fear when the very same CDC just happened to leave Anthrax out and about and forgot about it....but you know not harm no foul.
The flood of immigrants isn't helping either, they aren't stopping in Ellis Island and getting vaccinated, they are just hopping the border and making themselves at home.
Hooray, ebola!
Re: Quite angry about Ebola coverage
Ugh, I wish they'd leave the shit over there. What, are they going to bring man-eating hippos and the Boko Haram over here too? Fucking hell :roll eyes:
Nothing against Africans as a people, but Africa THE LAND, THE CONTINENT is scary as fuck. Aint going over there, don't want it coming over here. Blimey
Re: Quite angry about Ebola coverage
They gave the world THE AIDS and now they want to give the world THE EBOLA. Selfish, innit
Re: Quite angry about Ebola coverage
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanflicker
They gave the world THE AIDS and now they want to give the world THE EBOLA. Selfish, innit
Africa is not a person, it is a continent which has large parts raped, pillaged and ransacked by other continents. It is not deliberately trying to infect others.
Re: Quite angry about Ebola coverage
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanflicker
They gave the world THE AIDS and now they want to give the world THE EBOLA. Selfish, innit
Africa is not a person, it is a continent which has large parts raped, pillaged and ransacked by other continents. It is not deliberately trying to infect others.
Thanks for clearing that up. I would hate to have mislead the fine Saddo posters into believing that Africa is a person, and is actively trying to infect other people. Bravo. :rolleyes:
Re: Quite angry about Ebola coverage
[QUOTE=Master;1262029]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanflicker
Africa is not a person, it is a continent which has large parts raped, pillaged and ransacked by other continents. It is not deliberately trying to infect others.
Great example of the internet culture of debate, though.
The straw man and the act of taking obviously facetious statements seriously.
The shoe-horning in of the moral point that has absolutely no relevance to the discussion (what I said had nothing to do with whether or not Africa was raped and pillaged).
Just awful, awful posting.
I bet you heard a slow-clap starting in your head when you hit POST, didn't ya, dummy? Ugh.
Re: Quite angry about Ebola coverage
[QUOTE=Beanflicker;1262037]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanflicker
Africa is not a person, it is a continent which has large parts raped, pillaged and ransacked by other continents. It is not deliberately trying to infect others.
Great example of the internet culture of debate, though.
The straw man and the act of taking obviously facetious statements seriously.
The shoe-horning in of the moral point that has absolutely no relevance to the discussion (what I said had nothing to do with whether or not Africa was raped and pillaged).
Just awful, awful posting.
I bet you heard a slow-clap starting in your head when you hit POST, didn't ya, dummy? Ugh.
No I did not actually.
Re: Quite angry about Ebola coverage
Why are so many scientists and economists utterly demented and devoted to the science of human destruction? I suppose one reason is that many of them emerged from Nazi scientists that America adoringly imported post WW2. Take this man, Charles Arntzen, who is supposedly heavily involved in creating the new Ebola vaccine. Here he is advocating bio-weaponry and genocide as a solution to overpopulation. Lovely chap. Not.
Did The Creator Of The Experimental Ebola Drug Joke About Culling 25% Of The World's Population? | Zero Hedge