Mayweather's been avoiding me for years too!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Printable View
Mayweather's been avoiding me for years too!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Since the Olympics, right???? Well, I can kind of see Floyd's point. You usually don't see Olympic medalists competing with Special Olympics participants...Quote:
Originally Posted by ruthless rocco
He is the #1 contender for the WBA belt. If anything else, all other fights that are even less worthy, don't make excuses to not fight at least your mandatory.Quote:
Originally Posted by IamInuit
He ducked Manny as a mandatory as well.
Wilder is #1 for the WBCROCK and has never fought an opponent below 50. And when in the last 5 years has a mandatory ever effected Floyds decision making process?Quote:
Originally Posted by ykdadamajaHe is the #1 contender for the WBA belt. If anything else, all other fights that are even less worthy, don't make excuses to not fight at least your mandatory.Quote:
Originally Posted by IamInuit
He ducked Manny as a mandatory as well.
Make that when in ten years?
I know saying opinions that are absurd as fact is your thing but don't switch facts as well. Manny had himself removed from being Floyd's mandatory by fighting the one guy available to be removed, Bradley. Who he had said was unnecessary to rematch. Unnecessary to rematch until Pac was Floyd's mandatory and set to get the small cut. Then suddenly that fight mattered to Manny.Quote:
Originally Posted by ykdadamajaHe is the #1 contender for the WBA belt. If anything else, all other fights that are even less worthy, don't make excuses to not fight at least your mandatory.Quote:
Originally Posted by IamInuit
He ducked Manny as a mandatory as well.
That was not the real reason why Floyd and Pac Man never fought. Manny had to avenge the loss, he would like to do the same thing against JMM but he will not let him.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron SwansonI know saying opinions that are absurd as fact is your thing but don't switch facts as well. Manny had himself removed from being Floyd's mandatory by fighting the one guy available to be removed, Bradley. Who he had said was unnecessary to rematch. Unnecessary to rematch until Pac was Floyd's mandatory and set to get the small cut. Then suddenly that fight mattered to Manny.Quote:
Originally Posted by ykdadamajaHe is the #1 contender for the WBA belt. If anything else, all other fights that are even less worthy, don't make excuses to not fight at least your mandatory.Quote:
Originally Posted by IamInuit
He ducked Manny as a mandatory as well.
Why would Khan be on Floyds radar? Lost 2 of last 5, struggled agaisnt a guy Thurman flattened and one of them a nobody. Yea sounds like the type of opponent Floyd likes. Thurman is more deserving of a shot then Guerrero or Maidana was. Pathetic that you defend him for targeting weak oppositionQuote:
Originally Posted by IamInuit
You beat me to it. Add to that an old Mosely, and a more than hyped Victor Ortiz, what exactly from IamInuit's logic are we to deduce??Quote:
Originally Posted by SilkeyjoeWhy would Khan be on Floyds radar? Lost 2 of last 5, struggled agaisnt a guy Thurman flattened and one of them a nobody. Yea sounds like the type of opponent Floyd likes. Thurman is more deserving of a shot then Guerrero or Maidana was. Pathetic that you defend him for targeting weak oppositionQuote:
Originally Posted by IamInuit
I know right, but a mandatory that has a better idea of giving a better fight than anyone else out there.Quote:
Originally Posted by IamInuitWilder is #1 for the WBCROCK and has never fought an opponent below 50. And when in the last 5 years has a mandatory ever effected Floyds decision making process?Quote:
Originally Posted by ykdadamajaHe is the #1 contender for the WBA belt. If anything else, all other fights that are even less worthy, don't make excuses to not fight at least your mandatory.Quote:
Originally Posted by IamInuit
He ducked Manny as a mandatory as well.
If you feel Garcia, Khan, Alexander, Brook, can batter Thurman. Not win on points. But win decisively and batter him around, then you have to be out of your mind.
If Mayweather fights anyone other than Thurman or Manny, with the exception for Golovkin, then he is full of shit.
Put those three fights in the picture, I don't need to see a Canelo or Cotto rematch. Not at all. At MW or Jr. Middle.
Dude. What you been smoking ?Quote:
Originally Posted by SilkeyjoeWhy would Khan be on Floyds radar? Lost 2 of last 5, struggled agaisnt a guy Thurman flattened and one of them a nobody. Yea sounds like the type of opponent Floyd likes. Thurman is more deserving of a shot then Guerrero or Maidana was. Pathetic that you defend him for targeting weak oppositionQuote:
Originally Posted by IamInuit
Maidana beat Adrien Broner to get Floyd. Broner was seen as the next FM.
Guerro had beaten a succession of top quality fighters to get Floyd, Katsidis, Berto, Casamayor.
Thurman should go fight a Tim Bradley, Shawn Porter, Canelo, Demetrius Andrade....see how he get's on...should he fight one of them guys and DESTROY them or win convincingly then you could take him seriously in assessing his chances of beating FM.
Absolute horse shit with the sentence highlighted in red. Maidana whooped Broner's ass because it was presented to him, and Broner was feeling he was more than what he was at WW.Quote:
Originally Posted by denilson200Dude. What you been smoking ?Quote:
Originally Posted by SilkeyjoeWhy would Khan be on Floyds radar? Lost 2 of last 5, struggled agaisnt a guy Thurman flattened and one of them a nobody. Yea sounds like the type of opponent Floyd likes. Thurman is more deserving of a shot then Guerrero or Maidana was. Pathetic that you defend him for targeting weak oppositionQuote:
Originally Posted by IamInuit
Maidana beat Adrien Broner to get Floyd. Broner was seen as the next FM.
Guerro had beaten a succession of top quality fighters to get Floyd, Katsidis, Berto, Casamayor.
Thurman should go fight a Tim Bradley, Shawn Porter, Canelo, Demetrius Andrade....see how he get's on...should he fight one of them guys and DESTROY them or win convincingly then you could take him seriously in assessing his chances of beting FM.
It was only WHEN Broner went crying, did Mayweather's ego kick in and decided he would prove he would always be better than Broner when he is off the scene. Regardless of what Broner felt about himself.
Mayweather's ego caused the Maidana fight. And proved Broner's worth as Mayweather did struggle for the first fight, and fought an unmotivated Maidana in the second fight.
Thurman is the new ggg in the welterweight divison.
Didnt he draw with the guy that khan only just beat...the old lightweight?
Thurman should fight brook and khan..winner gets the money shot.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SilkeyjoeWhy would Khan be on Floyds radar? Lost 2 of last 5, struggled agaisnt a guy Thurman flattened and one of them a nobody. Yea sounds like the type of opponent Floyd likes. Thurman is more deserving of a shot then Guerrero or Maidana was. Pathetic that you defend him for targeting weak oppositionQuote:
Originally Posted by IamInuit
Where did I bring up Khan and since when does a W/L record have anything to do with Mayweather? The guy is in it for the money and always has been. Whats pathetic is people think every new 20 year old with a pulse in the welter division deserves a shot at Floyd. If this shit keeps up there will be a challenger at his grave site.
And ftr Khan because of styles is most likely more dangerous then the new flavour of the month.
More horse shit. It's mentalities like this is what causes the game to be fucked up like it is. Sure, some mandatories are bums. But this mandatory, as was Manny, isn't.Quote:
Originally Posted by IamInuitQuote:
Originally Posted by SilkeyjoeWhy would Khan be on Floyds radar? Lost 2 of last 5, struggled agaisnt a guy Thurman flattened and one of them a nobody. Yea sounds like the type of opponent Floyd likes. Thurman is more deserving of a shot then Guerrero or Maidana was. Pathetic that you defend him for targeting weak oppositionQuote:
Originally Posted by IamInuit
Where did I bring up Khan and since when does a W/L record have anything to do with Mayweather? The guy is in it for the money and always has been. Whats pathetic is people think every new 20 year old with a pulse in the welter division deserves a shot at Floyd. If this shit keeps up there will be a challenger at his grave site.
And ftr Khan because of styles is most likely more dangerous then the new flavour of the month.
Floyd cherry picking. He will make no more or less money fighting Thurman than he would Khan, give or take an extra 5 mil on the Khan side IF they fight in the UK- which will NOT happen.