You have to seriously consider writing screen plays for the Big Bang seriesQuote:
Originally Posted by BCBUD
Printable View
You have to seriously consider writing screen plays for the Big Bang seriesQuote:
Originally Posted by BCBUD
Ive seen a couple of planes fighting each other too, but it wasnt in a ring or in a stance.Quote:
Originally Posted by BCBUD
Well! I guess that settles it!Quote:
Originally Posted by AndreIve seen a couple of planes fighting each other too, but it wasnt in a ring or in a stance.Quote:
Originally Posted by BCBUD
This analogy is as flawed as it gets, I don't really know where to begin picking it apart. I'll start with the big one, a bullet isn't attached to anything and also the rifle isn't worried about getting punched in the face. Seriously man, use a little common sense.Quote:
Originally Posted by BCBUDBent or leaning objects don't have the initial propulsion that a level object does. That is why bullets are level!Quote:
Originally Posted by jmsIt's the exact opposite, more speed=more air resistance, hence terminal velocity. There is no logical way to draw your conclusions from a basic understanding of air resistance. Also Shavers' shoulders are uneven countless times in that one small highlight, like when throwing an overhand for example. Also, try slipping with your shoulders level, it doesn't work out.Quote:
Originally Posted by BCBUD
You're talking about a length of time...objects can travel faster until they reach their settling speed.Yes! Shaver's shoulders are level. Mike Tyson slipped punches with level shoulders.fact
The world is essentially a sphere. It doesn't have sides that can be up or down the way a body does. It also doesn't have something as simple as the gravity we experience to define which direction is "up" or down. Plus it's spinning while orbiting and moving in a vortex, but none of that shit is gonna make you punch harder. And you're trying to say the level of the shoulders significantly affects angular momentum?Quote:
Originally Posted by BCBUDHaha talk nerdy to me jk... Doesn't the world spin laterally without having to start its motion from having the left side up and the right side down? I unceremoniously offer up one last nerdy brain fart. the shoulders are the spinning wheel of gyroscope.What makes my surmise axiomatic is angular momentum that which measures the amount of rotation taking into account is mass, shape and speed.Quote:
Originally Posted by NVSeminThat's an interesting perspective. However, it is a bit naive, because this is only classical physics...Quote:
Originally Posted by BCBUD
How about space-time curvature, fist-arm particle-wave duality, extremum of a Lagrangian for Higgs-fist and Sushi-roll interraction under the event horizon in subcritical temperatures of a ring consiting of neutrino particlas first minutes after the Big Bang?
Now back to Lord of the Rings!
What I am saying is that the shoulders are like the spinning wheel on a gyroscope.
There are so many fundamental errors in what you're saying and the conclusions you're drawing-- misunderstandings of physics, anatomy and boxing theory.
Now this guy is onto something!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by NVSeminThat's an interesting perspective. However, it is a bit naive, because this is only classical physics...Quote:
Originally Posted by BCBUD
How about space-time curvature, fist-arm particle-wave duality, extremum of a Lagrangian for Higgs-fist and Sushi-roll interraction under the event horizon in subcritical temperatures of a ring consiting of neutrino particlas first minutes after the Big Bang?
Again, this is hopelessly misguided. Air resistance becomes a greater factor at higher speeds, much higher than anything a human is gonna move at. And again, the plane isn't attached to anything. It has no ground to power it's movement, making it completely irrelevant.Quote:
Originally Posted by BCBUD
No one should ever try to use physics to understand boxing. It literally never works out. Learn some anatomy and kinesiology instead, it'll get you twice as far with half the confusion.
Math shapes everything around mehttp://discovermagazine.com/~/media/Images/Issues/2013/December/math-made-flesh.jpg
http://math-fail.com/images-old/boxing-math.png
It makes no sense to fight of the back leg since as we know pressure cannot appear from nowhere in order to push the hand you have to push into the ground from the opposite direction, I.e the back leg being straight while the front leg bent.With one shoulder up and one shoulder down you have violated a law of pressure which I'll spare you the details on.
I get the feeling this place is being trolled :mad:. Had that feeling for a while. Think Ive had it.
Yep, you are so close.Quote:
Originally Posted by BCBUDWell! I guess that settles it!Quote:
Originally Posted by AndreIve seen a couple of planes fighting each other too, but it wasnt in a ring or in a stance.Quote:
Originally Posted by BCBUD
Maybe its a language problem. When i say fighting of the back foot, I actually mean on the backfoot with knee bent not straight. Straight back leg means the head is in the wrong place.Quote:
Originally Posted by BCBUD
Been thinking the same thing.Quote:
Originally Posted by Andre
Pressure? as in P=F/A? I'd like to see you try to explain that one.Quote:
Originally Posted by BCBUD