Printable View
I don't even begin to know how people do all time rankings. I can think of many greats that wouldn't stand a chance against Wladimir. But then those same guys beat men that might beat Wlad so is one better or is it match ups?
Do people take the time to list the top 50 then go through and imagine each head to head?
1) would have gone 42-8
2) would have gone 40-10
3)39-10-1
And so on? Because going through 50 guys against 49 others would take a hell of a long time
First off, vitali had to avenge wlads loss against Sanders. He also fought Lewis. He then fought arreola who I don't consider good but he has a decent chin and good punch and gave him a pretty good chance at beating wlad. Wlad did fight Peter but showed that even against a sub par fighter he was keep getting knocked down then vitali had to avenge that loss.Quote:
Originally Posted by Beanflicker
Like who though bro?Quote:
Originally Posted by powerpuncher
If anything, you should be arguing that vitali I
Is a top 5 HW not wlad.
Top 5 most boring big HW boxer ever, maybe! lol.
thank god for wilder is all im saying.
Big brother Vitali could beat up his young brother at his best. Vitali could get into a dog fight and know he would be OK, injuries let him down.Quote:
Originally Posted by powerpuncherFirst off, vitali had to avenge wlads loss against Sanders. He also fought Lewis. He then fought arreola who I don't consider good but he has a decent chin and good punch and gave him a pretty good chance at beating wlad. Wlad did fight Peter but showed that even against a sub par fighter he was keep getting knocked down then vitali had to avenge that loss.Quote:
Originally Posted by BeanflickerLike who though bro?Quote:
Originally Posted by powerpuncher
If anything, you should be arguing that vitali I
Is a top 5 HW not wlad.