Re: Floyd Mayweather 48-0
I've read that there's no rematch caluse but I'm sure there will be one if it's close or controversial, like when the Miadana fight seemed close. Floyd has one fight left after this so who else could he face for that much money?
I think the result will depend on how much PAC steals the first third of the fight with a knock-down or two. It's the only chance he seems to have, I think.
PS.: I can imagine him extending his career far too long for his own good if he looses that 0.
Re: Floyd Mayweather 48-0
Quote:
Originally Posted by
goti71
I've read that there's no rematch caluse but I'm sure there will be one if it's close or controversial, like when the Miadana fight seemed close. Floyd has one fight left after this so who else could he face for that much money?
I think the result will depend on how much PAC steals the first third of the fight with a knock-down or two. It's the only chance he seems to have, I think.
PS.: I can imagine him extending his career far too long for his own good if he looses that 0.
Johnny Nelson said that Floyd insisted on a rematch clause.
Re: Floyd Mayweather 48-0
Lots of folks here are just too overconfident when it comes to Floyd so this should shake you fellas up a bit:
http://ringobserver.com/articles/nac...eat-mayweather
But don't get too rattled just yet. Even I myself, the tardest of the pac-fans here, am surprised by Nacho's strong assertion. He said it as if it were a sure thang. Hmmm, let me thiink...
...the heck with it, He is dang right!;D
Re: Floyd Mayweather 48-0
This fight just had to happen, but it's five years too late in my humble opinion.
Floyd and Pac have both slipped a bit, but I think Manny has dipped more than Mayweather. A fighter of constant pressure, high energy and with a furious attack will usually start to deteriorate quicker than a defensive counterpuncher.
It's an intriguing clash of styles, the irresistible force meeting the immovable object. Neither guy is in his prime anymore but they are the two outstanding boxers of their generation.
Early prediction ..... and I reserve the right to change my mind several times over the next few months!
Pac starts quickly and wins the first few rounds, surprising Mayweather with his speed and unusual punching angles. He might buzz Floyd s couple of times of even score a flash knockdown.
However, he is ageing and a naturally smaller man, so he can't sustain that pace. Floyd begins to work him out and start to time him with the straight right as he comes in. This makes Pac more cautious, which plays into Mayweathers hands.
Floyd begins to dominate the pace and distance of the fight, by the 9th there is only going to be one winner. Floyd gets a decision or even a late stoppage.
After the fight, Mannys fans say he had aged and Mayweather could never have defeated the 'real' Pacquiao.
Re: Floyd Mayweather 48-0
I hope Manny gets drugged up with inspiration and just throws punches for ever second of every round and overwhelms the woman beater that is Floyd. :)
Re: Floyd Mayweather 48-0
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
goti71
I've read that there's no rematch caluse but I'm sure there will be one if it's close or controversial, like when the Miadana fight seemed close. Floyd has one fight left after this so who else could he face for that much money?
I think the result will depend on how much PAC steals the first third of the fight with a knock-down or two. It's the only chance he seems to have, I think.
PS.: I can imagine him extending his career far too long for his own good if he looses that 0.
Johnny Nelson said that Floyd insisted on a rematch clause.
I thought he was invincible...
Re: Floyd Mayweather 48-0
Quote:
Originally Posted by
pacfan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
goti71
I've read that there's no rematch caluse but I'm sure there will be one if it's close or controversial, like when the Miadana fight seemed close. Floyd has one fight left after this so who else could he face for that much money?
I think the result will depend on how much PAC steals the first third of the fight with a knock-down or two. It's the only chance he seems to have, I think.
PS.: I can imagine him extending his career far too long for his own good if he looses that 0.
Johnny Nelson said that Floyd insisted on a rematch clause.
I thought he was invincible...
Floyd is but he is also a diva and I would not be surprised he has chosen the judges, referee and gloves.
Re: Floyd Mayweather 48-0
Quote:
Originally Posted by
imp
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Greenbeanz
You don't need to make an excuse when someone loses. Most people other than Floyd and a lot of his fans are not so hung up on the idea of retaining that 0. Plenty of people rate fighters with losses as all time greats. For many even if Floyd retires with no losses he still will not eclipse certain fighters with losses on their record.
I love carl froch who HAS losses but is he better than JC without any losses.
JC undefeated record meant everything to him and he is arguably one of the best super middles of all time.
Where are you going with this?
I am not going anywhere ? Even if Froch had never lost and Calzaghe had. I could still rate Calzaghe above him. Floyd seems obsessed by the idea, doesn't mean we have to be.
Re: Floyd Mayweather 48-0
Quote:
Originally Posted by
goti71
I've read that there's no rematch caluse but I'm sure there will be one if it's close or controversial, like when the Miadana fight seemed close. Floyd has one fight left after this so who else could he face for that much money?
I think the result will depend on how much PAC steals the first third of the fight with a knock-down or two. It's the only chance he seems to have, I think.
PS.: I can imagine him extending his career far too long for his own good if he looses that 0.
I've read its a three fight deal so hopefully we get the skinny. The MGM being sold out in 15 minutes seems to be a lark. Hotels rooms that were 2 bills a night are now 7. Seats that were 250 to 500 are now 3,000 to 5,000. I dont understand the reluctance on this side of the world to hold something like this in an arena. At least that way every day working stiffs that actually follow the sport might be able to go.
Re: Floyd Mayweather 48-0
Quote:
Originally Posted by
IamInuit
Quote:
Originally Posted by
goti71
I've read that there's no rematch caluse but I'm sure there will be one if it's close or controversial, like when the Miadana fight seemed close. Floyd has one fight left after this so who else could he face for that much money?
I think the result will depend on how much PAC steals the first third of the fight with a knock-down or two. It's the only chance he seems to have, I think.
PS.: I can imagine him extending his career far too long for his own good if he looses that 0.
I've read its a three fight deal so hopefully we get the skinny. The MGM being sold out in 15 minutes seems to be a lark. Hotels rooms that were 2 bills a night are now 7. Seats that were 250 to 500 are now 3,000 to 5,000. I dont understand the reluctance on this side of the world to hold something like this in an arena. At least that way every day working stiffs that actually follow the sport might be able to go.
I must have seen it on Bleacher Report or something. Don't know really, but I'm hoping they'll do at least one more for us fans then (if it's close).
It's amusing how eveyone's checking those hotel vacancies. I looked up the Venetian myself, just in case I win the lottery ;D but I obviously won't be going. And those prices for front seats! Crazy world innit.
Re: Floyd Mayweather 48-0
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ruthless rocco
It's not Ariza that makes him seem guilty. It's the failure to accept a $100 million payday coupled with rediculous excuses like a fear a needles that all but indicts him. Not to mention an obvious drop in performance since he's voluntarily submitted himself to drug testing.
so getting older doesnt count? i guess u are a republican conspiracy theorist cause you dont need facts to make your judgements
Re: Floyd Mayweather 48-0
Quote:
Originally Posted by
imp
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ron Swanson
Quote:
Originally Posted by
pacfan
Lots of folks here are just too overconfident when it comes to Floyd so this should shake you fellas up a bit:
http://ringobserver.com/articles/nac...eat-mayweather
But don't get too rattled just yet. Even I myself, the
tardest of the pac-fans here, am surprised by Nacho's strong assertion. He said it as if it were a sure thang. Hmmm, let me thiink...
...the heck with it, He is dang right!;D
Nacho has predicted against Floyd before. On multiple occasions. If you want to build a case it's best to point at how much worse Floyd's legs looked last fight than Mannys.
Yep.
Nacho knows best.
Close the thread.
Jeez.
yep imp knows best:rolleyes: