Pascal was VERY inaccurate, I see some potential in the guy, he was not a world champ for nothing, more talent than Kovalev, but, like they say, hard work (Kovalev) beats lazy talent (Pascal).
Printable View
Pascal was VERY inaccurate, I see some potential in the guy, he was not a world champ for nothing, more talent than Kovalev, but, like they say, hard work (Kovalev) beats lazy talent (Pascal).
i watched the fight and i didnt see anything dodgy about the stoppage
do people think it was a bad stoppage?
Pascal should have distanced himself better.
He was just taking shot after shot and he had nowhere near the reactions to get out of the way of those jabs and straights.
Pascal had a couple of good rounds where he countered well and smashed Kovalev with the right hand. Kovalev at the punches and kept coming, so I don't know why anyone would watch a rematch. Pascal gave a valiant effort but lost, and I don't see what would be different in a rematch besides the round that he gets KO'd in.
The people that think boxing is like a playstation game.Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44