Printable View
Beanz you are WAY too touchy about this shit. The day you learn not to look for hidden, sinister signs in what people are saying and most importantly not to take it so personally, you will be a happier person mate.
Now go get a massage or something, dammit.
Not really, I think you have just become too comfortable and complacent in a forum where you can do no wrong and that you can't really handle healthy debate. I am a happy person which is why I don't go around posting such negative divisive shit.Quote:
Originally Posted by brocktonblockbust
I'm happy to see you are a happy person. It's good you have never posted negative, divisive shit.Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenbeanzNot really, I think you have just become too comfortable and complacent in a forum where you can do no wrong and that you can't really handle healthy debate. I am a happy person which is why I don't go around posting such negative divisive shit.Quote:
Originally Posted by brocktonblockbust
{Rod Serling: "That signpost up ahead---you have entered the ......."} :-X
Quote:
Originally Posted by brocktonblockbustI'm happy to see you are a happy person. It's good you have never posted negative, divisive shit.Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenbeanzNot really, I think you have just become too comfortable and complacent in a forum where you can do no wrong and that you can't really handle healthy debate. I am a happy person which is why I don't go around posting such negative divisive shit.Quote:
Originally Posted by brocktonblockbust
{Rod Serling: "That signpost up ahead---you have entered the ......."} :-X
I think my signature may not help things but I really do not see myself as the moral PC guardian that you make me out to be. I can't stand sychophancy. Maybe because I had to learn the lesson quite early I am not at all worried about standing out like a sore thumb or disagreeing with the general consensus. I don't have a problem with going against the tide or making an unpopular point. I haven't really fallen out with any British posters (other than Miles who is a very singular individual) because I think they can pick out the content without inferring the intention that many others don't. For somebody like you who makes his living by speaking different languages that may surprise you, but I really don't give a toss what you or other people think of me or whether they are politically correct or not. This is a forum at the end of the day and one in which everybody agreed 100% would be as dull as dishwater.
why should you or anyone give a shit about what people think of you or anyone? agreed. 100%Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenbeanzQuote:
Originally Posted by brocktonblockbustI'm happy to see you are a happy person. It's good you have never posted negative, divisive shit.Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenbeanzNot really, I think you have just become too comfortable and complacent in a forum where you can do no wrong and that you can't really handle healthy debate. I am a happy person which is why I don't go around posting such negative divisive shit.Quote:
Originally Posted by brocktonblockbust
{Rod Serling: "That signpost up ahead---you have entered the ......."} :-X
I think my signature may not help things but I really do not see myself as the moral PC guardian that you make me out to be. I can't stand sychophancy. Maybe because I had to learn the lesson quite early I am not at all worried about standing out like a sore thumb or disagreeing with the general consensus. I don't have a problem with going against the tide or making an unpopular point. I haven't really fallen out with any British posters (other than Miles who is a very singular individual) because I think they can pick out the content without inferring the intention that many others don't. For somebody like you who makes his living by speaking different languages that may surprise you, but I really don't give a toss what you or other people think of me or whether they are politically correct or not. This is a forum at the end of the day and one in which everybody agreed 100% would be as dull as dishwater.
It is wrong because life shouldn't be about strength. Those that are looting the system are the least among us and the least deserving and they are not 'strong'. They simply have a well serviced propaganda system and a useful bunch of idiots protecting them. That doesn't make them strong. They are cowardly, hateful people who start wars and cause suffering because they simply have no heart or connection with reality. Is Ian Duncan Smith strong? After all he has money, is doing very well and yet 'strong' is the last adjective you would cast his way. Is Prince Charles 'strong'? You know as well as anyone that the system is wrong and that the survival of the fittest ideology is a despicable one and when you reach inside yourself you know what is right and wrong. You cannot attack the poor without first coming to terms with the inherent failings of the system. Did the 'strong' systematically dismantle the economy and family values over a 30 year period and try to convince us that it was the fault of the weak? Too right they did. Brock, everyone knows there are lazy poor people, but being born with money doesn't make anyone strong. There are lazy rich people and they are being given far more than the weak poor people ever have. In fact the system exists entirely for them.