What would say is better? What is not retarded?
Printable View
On behalf of Miles I'll say a Royal roast.
Well to answer this question accurately and in depth I'll first admit to this: I will NEVER EVER EVER EVER EVER like or agree with their politics on the whole...certain things, maybe we can agree on, the sky being blue, the War on Drugs being bad, gravity working....but other stuff, nah I don't like socialism, I don't like Communism, I don't like SJW's, I don't like that "progressives" like to fit people into little boxes for example, if you're a minority be it by race gender or sexual orientation then you MUST be a Leftist either Democrat or something farther left, because you're SUPPOSED to be angry, you're SUPPOSED to be against this nation, you're SUPPOSED to be oppressed or have that feeling in your gut and if you don't then YOU are the problem, YOU have something wrong with yourself, YOU are a sell out, and shit that goes for even if you decide to be Independent or Libertarian.
So who is a "good" Liberal pundit? That's very difficult to answer because I never agree with them and I see them as hateful people. If you took the snark and disdain away from the Liberals then maybe Bill Maher, maybe Jon Stewart, but they are just so full of hate I don't even like praising them with caveats.
Who aren't retarded? Well that's an easier question to answer, The Young Turks are outrageous in the bullshit they produce, there are times when they take questions/comments/actions COMPLETELY out of context and make fools of themselves. I mean Cenk Ugyur couldn't even keep a show on MSNBC....that's how much of a fuckup he is!
No, I am not necessarily disagreeing with you, but was just curious what your parameters are. I am pretty down on most media outlets these days. It is all spin, fear, shock or outright lies. The British mainstream papers and news networks are dire and I tend to think the same about mainstream US media. The only difference is your presenters are more orange and in your face with the BS agenda. Strangely, I find the comments sections of newspapers tend to be more informative than the articles themselves as people provide links and a bit of humanity. There was a recent channel 4 interview with Jeremy Corbyn and I was astonished at the schoolboy behaviour of the 'journalist'. It simply isn't informative or even pretending to be neutral anymore. Then on your news networks you have round after round of retired military 'experts' all saying to bomb here, bomb there, bomb practically everywhere. It's crazy town. 'China must improve its human rights' says the nation that is torturing people, gunning down black people daily and has a prison population twice as large. You couldn't make it up.
The list could be quite long, but let's make a short one of name living up to the merit of being roasted:
Ann Coulter
Pat Robertson
Chris Christie
Eric Duhaime (you all probably don'T know him but he's a fucktard making radio show and who signs some more than horrible and un-educated point of view in a newspaper over here)
Dominic Strauss Kahn
Our prime Minister Stephen Harper
The whole Westboro Baptist Church activists.
Bibi Netanyahu
And that's just a small start.
Cameron
Osbourne
Boris