Re: Khan claims he'd be 100-0 if he cherry picked like Mayweather
Khan has now lost all my respect , that is a stupid thing to say.
Firstly Khan would have been Koed by many a fighter , secondly using an unbeaten Diego Corrales as an example , how can Khan say Floyd hand picked opponents ?
Re: Khan claims he'd be 100-0 if he cherry picked like Mayweather
Quote:
Originally Posted by
bzkfn
Khan: I'd Be 100-0 If I Cherry Picked Like Mayweather - Boxing News
People hate Khan because he says dumb things like this. Floyd's resume is much better than Khan's and he has 3 losses on his record. Prescott was also a cherry pick to keep his record going, and he got flattened in a round. I'm on the fence about Khan but he's been cherry picking soft punchers for the last few years to try and keep a Mayweather shot alive. If you're going to goad Floyd, use something with a bit of truth in it.
Khan is a bit of a bellend at times, mayweather is a lot of a bellend all of the time
Re: Khan claims he'd be 100-0 if he cherry picked like Mayweather
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Dark Lord Al
Khan has now lost all my respect , that is a stupid thing to say.
Firstly Khan would have been Koed by many a fighter , secondly using an unbeaten Diego Corrales as an example , how can Khan say Floyd hand picked opponents ?
I used to get really annoyed with Khan, but now I just outright laugh at the things he says. A comment like this one is so out there it is quite hysterical. ;D
Re: Khan claims he'd be 100-0 if he cherry picked like Mayweather
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Does Khan really have a bigger name value? Mayweather and his team don't seem to think so.
Bigger than Kel Brook and Keith Thurman? Of course he does, how could anyone argue that?
Dude has 1.6 million Twitter followers.
Re: Khan claims he'd be 100-0 if he cherry picked like Mayweather
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanflicker
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Does Khan really have a bigger name value? Mayweather and his team don't seem to think so.
Bigger than Kel Brook and Keith Thurman? Of course he does, how could anyone argue that?
Dude has 1.6 million Twitter followers.
Yeah, didn't he "buy" all those followers so that he could rig the Khan/Maidana vote off? And even that never worked.
Nobody talks about Khan in the UK, nobody talks about him with any respect in the US, and the only person who regularly talks about Khan is.... KHAN!
Re: Khan claims he'd be 100-0 if he cherry picked like Mayweather
For his own sake, his promoter should monitor his twitter, his facebook and everything related to social networks and he should forbid him to make any interviews where he simply embarrass himself.
Re: Khan claims he'd be 100-0 if he cherry picked like Mayweather
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Nobody talks about Khan in the UK
:confused:
Disagree there mate.
Re: Khan claims he'd be 100-0 if he cherry picked like Mayweather
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Jimanuel Boogustus
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Nobody talks about Khan in the UK
:confused:
Disagree there mate.
Brooks talks about Khan as does Hearn.
Re: Khan claims he'd be 100-0 if he cherry picked like Mayweather
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Yeah, didn't he "buy" all those followers so that he could rig the Khan/Maidana vote off? And even that never worked.
Nobody talks about Khan in the UK, nobody talks about him with any respect in the US, and the only person who regularly talks about Khan is.... KHAN!
I assumed he was a big deal in the UK. He is a silver medalist and one of the current top talents from England.
Re: Khan claims he'd be 100-0 if he cherry picked like Mayweather
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanflicker
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Yeah, didn't he "buy" all those followers so that he could rig the Khan/Maidana vote off? And even that never worked.
Nobody talks about Khan in the UK, nobody talks about him with any respect in the US, and the only person who regularly talks about Khan is.... KHAN!
I assumed he was a big deal in the UK. He is a silver medalist and one of the current top talents from England.
Hearn and Brook talk about Khan, Khan talks about Floyd , but Joe Public doesn't talk about Khan.
He was a Silver medallist about 3 million years ago. Most of the public wouldn't even remember which Olympics it was. (I do btw for the record.):)
Re: Khan claims he'd be 100-0 if he cherry picked like Mayweather
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanflicker
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Well it has not got Brooks or Thurman the fight with Floyd, so your theory is blown out of the water right there. :)
Yeah but come on now, Amir has a much bigger name value than those guys and his name value would be that much bigger if he hadn't lost those fights.
You Brits would still be fawning over him and demanding a fight with Floyd and it would happen.
please don't speak on my behalf
Re: Khan claims he'd be 100-0 if he cherry picked like Mayweather
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Batman
please don't speak on my behalf
If he had whipped Prescott, Peterson and Garcia you wouldn't be fawning over him and demanding a Floyd match?
Child please!
Re: Khan claims he'd be 100-0 if he cherry picked like Mayweather
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanflicker
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Batman
please don't speak on my behalf
If he had whipped Prescott, Peterson and Garcia you wouldn't be fawning over him and demanding a Floyd match?
Child please!
One of my biggest regrets in life was that I decided to go out on the piss on the night of the Prescott fight and missed him getting sparked out live, didn't like him before the his first loss, didn't like him after his first loss
Re: Khan claims he'd be 100-0 if he cherry picked like Mayweather
Re: Khan claims he'd be 100-0 if he cherry picked like Mayweather
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanflicker
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Well it has not got Brooks or Thurman the fight with Floyd, so your theory is blown out of the water right there. :)
Yeah but come on now,
Amir has a much bigger name value than those guys and his name value would be that much bigger if he hadn't lost those fights. You Brits would still be fawning over him and demanding a fight with Floyd and it would happen.
Does Khan really have a bigger name value? Mayweather and his team don't seem to think so. And although I'm not in the States, I don't believe he's really that highly thought of there either.
I did say a long time ago, Khan isn't going to get the Mayweather fight , so he might as well just abuse Mayweather at every opportunity, and it might just get in people's heads.
But his character assassination has started way too late, and now he just looks like a whinging twat!
Khan doesn't really believe any of this shit and he's a cock really. Deep down , Khan is now worried about who he fights next, because he can't keep avoiding punchers and top fighters in the division. Exactly who will he fight?
WTF does 'name value' mean? Bullshit value, hype value? Says it all, Khans only credentials for a Mayweather slot are that he gets on telly a lot doing dumb ass interviews. His PR bills and Oscars investments in him look distinctly unlikely to be repaid, Ha bloody Ha, you have to walk the walk..... And he aint.
