Re: Saul Alvarez vs John Mugabi
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Losing to Hagler, Norris and G Man is not a bad thing but Duane Thomas was a bad one.
Sometimes you learn the real deal after a defeat. Mugabi ballooned to near 200lbs post Hagler and was really never the same. He rolled over some gritty second tier types getting to Hagler but when your biggest claim to fame is based on a loss, I mean come on. Tough dude but Canelo would be like size, better composed and his boxing would see him do well me thinks. If Duane Thomas shatters you orbital bone with a left hook and makes you turn your back..Alvaraz could get to him too.
Re: Saul Alvarez vs John Mugabi
Quote:
Originally Posted by
greynotsoold
Mugabi fights him at 55 and knocks him out. He beat a lot of good fighters at 54 and was on the rise. He fought his heart out against Hagler; that Mugabi beats Canelo in 4-5.
Make it Iinteresting. Make Canelo hit 155 that day.
Name them
Re: Saul Alvarez vs John Mugabi
Canelo is my poster boy for how far the sport has fallen since it's hey day. He's a good kid who made a name for himself by beating noticeably smaller fighters, many of whom were past their prime. I see guys like Oba Carr, Fernando Vargas, and Mugabi being too much for Canelo. I say Mugabi in 8.
