Quote:
Originally Posted by
ross
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ryanman
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ross
I see mentions of his shape and weight and also saw a video of Haye saying how badly out if shape Fury is but the interviewer says "Hatton did it". Haye answers that ahatton didnt get that badly out of shape. Bullshit! Hatton went from being a 10 stone fighter to ballooning up 5 stone between fights! Tyson is 18.5 stone and putting on only 3!!
If Tyson put the same amount of mass on that Hatton did between fights hed be 30 stone!
Although that ignores that on fight night Hatton was cut to the bone and Fury is fat even at his most 'ripped'... So they aren't starting from the same place even relatively speaking.
Not that I think it matters to Fury. He'll be in the same shape he normally is. Which is fine for him. But the comparison you made is a bit wonky ;)
Even if Tyson took another stone off to get ripped to the bone hes still only lost 4 stone to Hattons 5!!!:rolleyes:
Hattons 5,7" Furys 6,9" clearly you can see Hatton was massively overweight compared to Fury?
Hatton ballooned up to add 50% of his fighting weight on.
Yeah Hatton got much bigger as a weight percentage of course, but how 'overweight' they get obviously depends on whether their starting point was already overweight. Ie 4 stone on a ripped physique is not 4 stone 'overweight', and 4 stone
more weight on someone already 2 stone overweight makes them 6 stone overweight. So your logic is a bit faulty.
Hatton probably got so fat that he got to about the same bf% as Tyson is now. So they're probably fairly even in terms of how out of shape they get. Both are fatties when they let themselves go. Hatton then used to get shredded. And Fury will get less fat.
Anyway Ross, like I say, I don't think Tyson's weight gain matters. It's not like he was in fantastic shape anyway. He'll be in the same shape as he was before and that was good enough to win.
Just an odd comparison that's all to compare a Ripped then Fat Light Welter with a Fat then Fatter Heavy.