Printable View
Off the tip of my tongue:Quote:
Originally Posted by Master
Johnson
Dempsey
Willard
Louis
Marciano
Walcott
Patterson
Johanssen
Jeffries
Tunney
Carnera
Baer
O Sullivan
Liston
Clay
Frazier
Foreman
Ali
Spinks
Holmes
Norton
Tyson
Douglas
Holyfield
Bowe
Lewis
Ruiz
Rahman
McCall
Klitschko
Fury
Peter
Valuev
Wilder
Stiverne
There that's 36 champs compiled in 1:30 seconds
Samual Peter?
Byrd, Seldon, Whitherspoon, Tucker, Berbick, Briggs, Tubbs, Ellis, Spinks (the other one;D), Mercer, Morrison, Bentt, Hide, Povetkin, Liakovich, Chagaev, Ibragimov.Quote:
Originally Posted by brocktonblockbustOff the tip of my tongue:Quote:
Originally Posted by Master
Johnson
Dempsey
Willard
Louis
Marciano
Walcott
Patterson
Johanssen
Jeffries
Tunney
Carnera
Baer
O Sullivan
Liston
Clay
Frazier
Foreman
Ali
Spinks
Holmes
Norton
Tyson
Douglas
Holyfield
Bowe
Lewis
Ruiz
Rahman
McCall
Klitschko
Fury
Peter
Valuev
Wilder
Stiverne
There that's 36 champs compiled in 1:30 seconds
Thats up to 53 someone else take over;D
The second KlitschkoQuote:
Originally Posted by rossByrd, Seldon, Whitherspoon, Tucker, Berbick, Briggs, Tubbs, Ellis, Spinks (the other one;D), Mercer, Morrison, Bentt, Hide, Povetkin, Liakovich, Chagaev, Ibragimov.Quote:
Originally Posted by brocktonblockbustOff the tip of my tongue:Quote:
Originally Posted by Master
Johnson
Dempsey
Willard
Louis
Marciano
Walcott
Patterson
Johanssen
Jeffries
Tunney
Carnera
Baer
O Sullivan
Liston
Clay
Frazier
Foreman
Ali
Spinks
Holmes
Norton
Tyson
Douglas
Holyfield
Bowe
Lewis
Ruiz
Rahman
McCall
Klitschko
Fury
Peter
Valuev
Wilder
Stiverne
There that's 36 champs compiled in 1:30 seconds
Thats up to 53 someone else take over;D
54
Jack Sharkey, Smith, Bruno, Coetzee, Dokes, Weaver....:p
Just out of respect to all those true HW's who campaigned at that weight throughout their careers.... and worked their way up the ranks like everybody else... and got no shortcuts to fight the champions, until their own careers merited a shot at the title... I would say HELL NO.
Unless of course there had only been 51 heavyweights in the history of boxing... and then only grudgingly I would say "yes" to the question.
Which by the way I thought was a joke at first, but maybe it wasn't.
I would feel comfortable placing Haye in the top 150-200 heavyweights ever. If we are talking guys who shoot their mouths off and underperform, then show no shame in making ridiculous excuses for losing, I place him solidly in the top 2-3 p4p ever. Guy is a great hype job because looks the part, has talent, and shoots his mouth off better than most, but rarely backs it up against top competition (if ever).
I like that bud. Yeah I'll put 'im at 199 out of 200.Quote:
Originally Posted by mikeeod
Samuel Peter?
Thats the second time youve posted that.Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44
Agreed top 200
I thought the same thing.Quote:
Originally Posted by rossThats the second time youve posted that.Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44
I wrote "Peter" in original post.
It's not exactly hard to get in the top 50. I mean I reckon I must get in the top 200Quote:
Originally Posted by brocktonblockbust
Ali. Frazier.Norton. Dempsey. Tunney. Marciano. Liston. Holyfield. Bowe. Lewis. Holmes. Ezzard Charles. Paterson. Louis. Foreman. W.Klitschko. V.Klitschko. Jack Johnson. Tyson
These heavies are absolute musts. But that's still leaves 31 spaces ? So it's gonna be padded out with the likes of David Haye. You could throw Ingmar Johannsen and Max Schemiling, but even that leaves 28 to fill. So Haye easily get's in.
Great point..... schmeling
Quote:
Originally Posted by brocktonblockbustI thought the same thing.Quote:
Originally Posted by rossThats the second time youve posted that.Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44
I wrote "Peter" in original post.
no one answered the first time
by peter do you mean Samuel peter?