Nigel Benn would have another 3 or 4 losses by DQ if we go to the letter of the law.Quote:
Originally Posted by Vendettos
Printable View
Nigel Benn would have another 3 or 4 losses by DQ if we go to the letter of the law.Quote:
Originally Posted by Vendettos
He should have had those losses.....Hell McClellan beat the piss out of him and any other ref would have stopped that fightQuote:
Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al
So did Tyson.
Yeah against Savarese he really went nutsQuote:
Originally Posted by Master
@BatmanQuote:
Originally Posted by Batman
If Whyte felt the effect of it enough to hinder his performance then yes.
The AA disqualification was shocking, Dirrell should never have been allowed
To box again
So what you are saying is that because Whytes chin took the blow the fight should have been allowed to continue and if he had a glass jaw and went down then AJ should have been DQ'd?Quote:
Originally Posted by Vendettos@BatmanQuote:
Originally Posted by Batman
If Whyte felt the effect of it enough to hinder his performance then yes.
Isn't that penalising the tougher man?
Doesn't that go against your earlier point that an illegal blow is worth a DQ regardless of how the fight was going and weather the other dude had a chance or not?
You start DQing AJ and Parker for those punches and you are advocating play acting and people will be rolling around just to get the other fighter DQ'd.
P.s. I've wrote this post on the bus so if it is jargon or doesn't make sense blame my phone and the bus.
I'm not 100% but I believe if the illegal shot isn't fight ending it's a deduction but if it causes the fight to be stopped then DQ is called.Quote:
Originally Posted by BatmanSo what you are saying is that because Whytes chin took the blow the fight should have been allowed to continue and if he had a glass jaw and went down then AJ should have been DQ'd?Quote:
Originally Posted by Vendettos@BatmanQuote:
Originally Posted by Batman
If Whyte felt the effect of it enough to hinder his performance then yes.
Isn't that penalising the tougher man?
Doesn't that go against your earlier point that an illegal blow is worth a DQ regardless of how the fight was going and weather the other dude had a chance or not?
You start DQing AJ and Parker for those punches and you are advocating play acting and people will be rolling around just to get the other fighter DQ'd.
P.s. I've wrote this post on the bus so if it is jargon or doesn't make sense blame my phone and the bus.
So yeah I'm still by my initial point.
Dirrell was seriously hurt with that punch.Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44
So if the person on the receiving end plays it up and makes out they are unable to continue then it's a DQ?Quote:
Originally Posted by VendettosI'm not 100% but I believe if the illegal shot isn't fight ending it's a deduction but if it causes the fight to be stopped then DQ is called.Quote:
Originally Posted by BatmanSo what you are saying is that because Whytes chin took the blow the fight should have been allowed to continue and if he had a glass jaw and went down then AJ should have been DQ'd?Quote:
Originally Posted by Vendettos@BatmanQuote:
Originally Posted by Batman
If Whyte felt the effect of it enough to hinder his performance then yes.
Isn't that penalising the tougher man?
Doesn't that go against your earlier point that an illegal blow is worth a DQ regardless of how the fight was going and weather the other dude had a chance or not?
You start DQing AJ and Parker for those punches and you are advocating play acting and people will be rolling around just to get the other fighter DQ'd.
P.s. I've wrote this post on the bus so if it is jargon or doesn't make sense blame my phone and the bus.
So yeah I'm still by my initial point.
It's a man's sport, I get what you are saying but I think a lot of it is down to the ref to make a judgement call.
If he thinks someone is playing it up as an excuse to get outta there then fuck em and that is precisely what happened in the Parker fight
why should he have stopped the fight?Quote:
Originally Posted by El KabongHe should have had those losses.....Hell McClellan beat the piss out of him and any other ref would have stopped that fightQuote:
Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al
@Master is there something going on in your personally life at the minute?Quote:
Originally Posted by MasterDirrell was seriously hurt with that punch.Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44
LOL when I first saw the punch I thought it was nothing but Dirrell was seriously hurt. Now I am not sure if it was that particular punch that caused him the problem.Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44@Master is there something going on in your personally life at the minute?Quote:
Originally Posted by MasterDirrell was seriously hurt with that punch.Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44
Remember Eubank v Dan Sherry and the back header?
was he fuck hurtQuote:
Originally Posted by MasterLOL when I first saw the punch I thought it was nothing but Dirrell was seriously hurt. Now I am not sure if it was that particular punch that caused him the problem.Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44@Master is there something going on in your personally life at the minute?Quote:
Originally Posted by MasterDirrell was seriously hurt with that punch.Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44
Remember Eubank v Dan Sherry and the back header?
all that twitching on the floor
its the kind of twitching kids do when they are pretending to be dead
being a boxing fan i've seen plenty of people knocked out and I know the difference between being knocked out and doing some ridiculous acting job
You have no credibility, you think Bruno was a great heavyweight and that Brook nearly beat GGG. So what do you now?