Re: Josh Warrington v Kiko Martinez 13 MAY
What's Warrington's chances against Selby? I don't think he's in that league yet.
Re: Josh Warrington v Kiko Martinez 13 MAY
Re: Josh Warrington v Kiko Martinez 13 MAY
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Dark Lord Al
Selby hits like Miles .
Miles? Selby is a very good boxer. He hits harder than Warrington but only slightly.
Re: Josh Warrington v Kiko Martinez 13 MAY
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Dark Lord Al
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Btw, Mayweather made it big in America because he's a WINNER!
The Americans are very fussy about who they throw money at, whereas the Brits aren't.
For example, do you honestly believe Haye v Bellew would've been very interesting to the Yanks?
Please don't patronise me as an Englishman , that I thought Haye v Bellew was anything more than a freak show.
Glass jawed fat CW beats former HW belt holder in a bore fest. It was what it was.
I'm not patronising you. I know people over here saw the fight for what it was........but they still bought it.
In the States, the only way that would've sold is if it was WWE. (Unless of course they were Mexican. They seem to sell well in the States regardless of how good they are.)
Lets see how the sideshow of Briggs and Oquendo does. It will give us a good measure I guess.
Re: Josh Warrington v Kiko Martinez 13 MAY
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Alpha
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Dark Lord Al
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Btw, Mayweather made it big in America because he's a WINNER!
The Americans are very fussy about who they throw money at, whereas the Brits aren't.
For example, do you honestly believe Haye v Bellew would've been very interesting to the Yanks?
Please don't patronise me as an Englishman , that I thought Haye v Bellew was anything more than a freak show.
Glass jawed fat CW beats former HW belt holder in a bore fest. It was what it was.
I'm not patronising you. I know people over here saw the fight for what it was........but they still bought it.
In the States, the only way that would've sold is if it was WWE. (Unless of course they were Mexican. They seem to sell well in the States regardless of how good they are.)
Lets see how the sideshow of Briggs and Oquendo does. It will give us a good measure I guess.
Exactly my point! Let's see if they earn $9 million between them, let's see if it's ppv and if it is, what numbers it does.
Re: Josh Warrington v Kiko Martinez 13 MAY
Warrington did come along at the right time. With the Loyal Leeds united fan base and the new arena that opened it couldn't have been more perfect timing.
For years I've been wishing Leeds had a decent arena and a good boxer to get behind yet Im not excited about Warrington as don't think he has it to compete with the elite. I haven't even been to one of his fights at the arena yet despite it being local - did go see him fight at Leeds town hall a few years back.
I think his career will come to an end sooner rather than later but he will earn some decent money - good luck to him.
And I think Miles maybe does punch harder.
Re: Josh Warrington v Kiko Martinez 13 MAY
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Btw, Mayweather made it big in America because he's a WINNER!
The Americans are very fussy about who they throw money at, whereas the Brits aren't.
For example, do you honestly believe Haye v Bellew would've been very interesting to the Yanks?
Piss off with the Mayweather winner bollocks. Floyd needed a good opposition to get high figures and he was over payed by a dumb executive from the love company. Floyd is wank to watch.
Hey, I'm not some sort of Flomo, he is a Twat, that is undeniable. What is also undeniable is that he is a solid cast iron WINNER and that's a fact!
As for these "Dumb executives" , answer me this, did the deals that they made with Floyd make their Companies a profit?
So tell me, who's dumb ?
They may have made a loss, the fights against Berto and Guerrero
would have had poor sales. Either way value for money in terms of entertainment Floyd must be the worst in the history of boxing.
So basically you're guessing and have no factual evidence.hopefully our American friends on here can give us the facts, which I'm sure we both know will point to the fact that they made a profit on their investment in Floyd.
This is the 21st Century, nobody gives people shit loads of money for nothing. If you think them execs are dumb, then you have no grasp of the basics of business or YOU are dumb. Perhaps even both.;)
Re: Josh Warrington v Kiko Martinez 13 MAY
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Btw, Mayweather made it big in America because he's a WINNER!
The Americans are very fussy about who they throw money at, whereas the Brits aren't.
For example, do you honestly believe Haye v Bellew would've been very interesting to the Yanks?
Piss off with the Mayweather winner bollocks. Floyd needed a good opposition to get high figures and he was over payed by a dumb executive from the love company. Floyd is wank to watch.
Hey, I'm not some sort of Flomo, he is a Twat, that is undeniable. What is also undeniable is that he is a solid cast iron WINNER and that's a fact!
As for these "Dumb executives" , answer me this, did the deals that they made with Floyd make their Companies a profit?
So tell me, who's dumb ?
They may have made a loss, the fights against Berto and Guerrero
would have had poor sales. Either way value for money in terms of entertainment Floyd must be the worst in the history of boxing.
So basically you're guessing and have no factual evidence.hopefully our American friends on here can give us the facts, which I'm sure we both know will point to the fact that they made a profit on their investment in Floyd.
This is the 21st Century, nobody gives people shit loads of money for nothing. If you think them execs are dumb, then you have no grasp of the basics of business or YOU are dumb. Perhaps even both.;)
The companies will never admit they have overpaid, look at the football, they just raise the prices and move the executives.
Re: Josh Warrington v Kiko Martinez 13 MAY
@Master - Chief executive of Bullshit TV!!!;D;D
Re: Josh Warrington v Kiko Martinez 13 MAY
The yanks were more excited about Haye Bellew than the Brits