Printable View
I totally agree with the OP and his thesis. I'm into high output fighters who give their all and that is why Joe Calzaghe is the greatest fighter of all time. You have to throw punches. None of this 'Hopkins landed the 7 cleanest punches in the fight' nonsense. You throw more, you land more, you win more rounds, you beat the old dinosaur who refuses to throw anything. As the OP says, go and play ping pong.
this thread is ace
Boxers who throw less than 40 punches/round lose one point. Less than 20 punches/round lose 1.5 points. Less than 10 punches per round lose 2 points. Zero punches per round DQ.
FACT.
Y'now what, It's this kind of cutting edge commentary and boxing nous that keeps me coming back to Saddo's after all these years.
You're right. I'm over the years I have been honored to contribute to that phenomenon of keeping you coming back and all the other DieHard boxing fans. I would like to continue with a further Point here that a fighter should lose a point after two warnings for any single infraction of the law. One low blow hey keep them up. Second low blow this is a warning I said keep it up. 3rd low blow lose one point. The same thing goes for holding in hitting or rabbit punching or thumbing. Boxes need to start losing points just like the Law and Order problem in the societies of Europe in the United States where the law is just simply not being enforced just like that problem in society what happens inside a boxing ring is a microcosm of that same phenomenon. Enforcing the law are now is seen as something bad. Referees do not want to look like the bad guys who are stifling the ebb and flow of a fight. But I'll tell you what stifles the ebb and flow of a fight even worse than that is when you land low blows on an opponent over and over and over and the ref does nothing and that leads to your opponent's eventual weakening and knockout.Quote:
Originally Posted by Memphis