North Korea launches an ICBM over Japan, and ***NEEDS 2 B NUKED***

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gandalf

I take it you are still smarting over being shown to be completely ignorant when it comes to historical context, Tito. I notice you are more interested in trying to mock a balanced political position rather than actually point out that what Brock is saying is completely insane. Let's put things into context shall we. Brocks team has bombed Yemen dozens of times and killed actual people. North Korea meanwhile has once again lobbed a rocket into the sea. Yet, we have a demented madman on this forum arguing the case that North Korea should be nuked by the country dropping bombs on actual people for firing rockets into the sea. You honestly do not see how insane such a position is? I swear some of you have lost your marbles.

---

I thought it was just you who laughingly defends North Korea, until I saw that Fenster liked your post.... which makes perfect sense since Fenster has never forgiven me for mercilessly poking fun at his JMM ducked Naz conspiracy theories.

So it didn't matter that Brock dumbed it down for you..... you still insist on carrying Kim Jong-un's jock. Heh-heh.

For the record, I never agreed that NK should be nuked. I don't think anyone should be nuked. Unless of course Baby Huey really does something stupid..... then obviously there would have to be retaliation. So before you start grouping us together, actually read my posts. If.... you're capable of reading something other than your own babbling bullshit.

The U.S.'s record or past transgressions have no bearing here. Maybe this is beyond the reach of understanding of you and your one-man fan club (or my one-man hate club, whichever the case may be). But we're focusing on NK's threat to use nukes. Is this too much of a complicated issue for you to understand? I don't give a rat's ass how "bad" the U.S. is or has been. The only point here is that Baby Huey is threatening to nuke Guam and Alaska, without the U.S. having threatened to do the same to NK.

Try to follow here:

1. NK is the only nation currently threatening to use nukes on innocent people.

2. NK is a relatively impoverished nation, but its poor citizens are kept on strict mind control by Baby Huey and his forces.

(On this point, you hysterically claim brainwashing and propaganda over on this side..... and you can't seem to see the evidence right in front of your metro-sexual nose that screams to the very same thing occurring in North Korea. But since you've made a little life for yourself in that part of the world, and married an Asian woman, you've developed this sort of blind, sick, inane "loyalty" that translates into frankly never making any sense).


LMFAO at the ever-lasting cliques in this forum.

I proudly stand alone in my opinions, and belong to no cliques.

I've argued with Brock and Lyle endlessly about Trump.

I've argued endlessly with Lyle about gun control.


But I'm firmly on their side and against yours about North ("poor little") Korea.

Meanwhile, you and little Band of 3 stick together like tapeworms in a pile of shit, and disagree with everyone else regardless of the argument.

:vd:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TitoFan

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gandalf

I take it you are still smarting over being shown to be completely ignorant when it comes to historical context, Tito. I notice you are more interested in trying to mock a balanced political position rather than actually point out that what Brock is saying is completely insane. Let's put things into context shall we. Brocks team has bombed Yemen dozens of times and killed actual people. North Korea meanwhile has once again lobbed a rocket into the sea. Yet, we have a demented madman on this forum arguing the case that North Korea should be nuked by the country dropping bombs on actual people for firing rockets into the sea. You honestly do not see how insane such a position is? I swear some of you have lost your marbles.

---

I thought it was just you who laughingly defends North Korea, until I saw that Fenster liked your post.... which makes perfect sense since Fenster has never forgiven me for mercilessly poking fun at his JMM ducked Naz conspiracy theories.

So it didn't matter that Brock dumbed it down for you..... you still insist on carrying Kim Jong-un's jock. Heh-heh.

For the record, I never agreed that NK should be nuked. I don't think anyone should be nuked. Unless of course Baby Huey really does something stupid..... then obviously there would have to be retaliation. So before you start grouping us together, actually read my posts. If.... you're capable of reading something other than your own babbling bullshit.

The U.S.'s record or past transgressions have no bearing here. Maybe this is beyond the reach of understanding of you and your one-man fan club (or my one-man hate club, whichever the case may be). But we're focusing on NK's threat to use nukes. Is this too much of a complicated issue for you to understand? I don't give a rat's ass how "bad" the U.S. is or has been. The only point here is that Baby Huey is threatening to nuke Guam and Alaska, without the U.S. having threatened to do the same to NK.

Try to follow here:

1. NK is the only nation currently threatening to use nukes on innocent people.

2. NK is a relatively impoverished nation, but its poor citizens are kept on strict mind control by Baby Huey and his forces.

(On this point, you hysterically claim brainwashing and propaganda over on this side..... and you can't seem to see the evidence right in front of your metro-sexual nose that screams to the very same thing occurring in North Korea. But since you've made a little life for yourself in that part of the world, and married an Asian woman, you've developed this sort of blind, sick, inane "loyalty" that translates into frankly never making any sense).


LMFAO at the ever-lasting cliques in this forum.

I proudly stand alone in my opinions, and belong to no cliques.

I've argued with Brock and Lyle endlessly about Trump.

I've argued endlessly with Lyle about gun control.


But I'm firmly on their side and against yours about North ("poor little") Korea.

Meanwhile, you and little Band of 3 stick together like tapeworms in a pile of shit, and disagree with everyone else regardless of the argument.

:vd:

---

Just for grins. ;)

And for the umpteenth fucking time.....



What the fuck does the U.S. bombing Japan in 1945 have to do with the current situation of NK threatening to nuke Guam and Alaska??



Pray tell.




The past is the past. We're talking about preserving humanity today, in 2017. After those horrible nuclear bombings, there was a concerted global effort to prevent that sort of thing ever happening in the future. And there's been countless military conflicts since WWII..... and there has never been the use of nuclear weapons since then.


Capiche??

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by walrus

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gandalf

Keep on swallowing the kool Aid, Brock and Walrus. Most people can think a little deeper than that. Beanz and my own comparison were sound ones. The trouble is up there in the Trump orifice, you just cannot see properly.

Context time: Right now the US is carrying out drills and exercises against NK. As usual NK responds. The media mostly hush hushes the former but makes 'big drama show' out of the latter.

Then you have uninformed nut jobs wanting nuclear war. For two people who don't like fake news, they sure have you wrapped around their finger.

---

Dude those happen with every military all over the world. Look the bottom line is nothing will happen with nk. Just blustery words that have been reiterated since the fifties. If u support how best Korea operates, building missiles to the ire of not just the us but to the world community bully to you. They clap when missiles launch as best Korean citizens die of starvation. If they just cut the shit they would get foreign aid up the ass and people wouldn't suffer as much. If military action were taken your country(second best Korea) would lose its capital in a fire ball. We have no interest in seeing that happen. If best Korea did launch against a us territory the response would be automatic and terribly your country miles would go

---

You seem misguided, Walrus. I am not happy with how North Korea behaves, but by the same token where is the outrage when your own country just recently tested nuclear weapons? Where is the outrage when bombs fall on Yemen? All I do is point out the double standards and hypocrisy. I am not a fan of the foreign or domestic policy of either country.

I am quite aware what an escalation means and that is why I would prefer to see a sensible outcome. Brocks position is certainly an insane one.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TitoFan

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gandalf

I take it you are still smarting over being shown to be completely ignorant when it comes to historical context, Tito. I notice you are more interested in trying to mock a balanced political position rather than actually point out that what Brock is saying is completely insane. Let's put things into context shall we. Brocks team has bombed Yemen dozens of times and killed actual people. North Korea meanwhile has once again lobbed a rocket into the sea. Yet, we have a demented madman on this forum arguing the case that North Korea should be nuked by the country dropping bombs on actual people for firing rockets into the sea. You honestly do not see how insane such a position is? I swear some of you have lost your marbles.

---

I thought it was just you who laughingly defends North Korea, until I saw that Fenster liked your post.... which makes perfect sense since Fenster has never forgiven me for mercilessly poking fun at his JMM ducked Naz conspiracy theories.

So it didn't matter that Brock dumbed it down for you..... you still insist on carrying Kim Jong-un's jock. Heh-heh.

For the record, I never agreed that NK should be nuked. I don't think anyone should be nuked. Unless of course Baby Huey really does something stupid..... then obviously there would have to be retaliation. So before you start grouping us together, actually read my posts. If.... you're capable of reading something other than your own babbling bullshit.

The U.S.'s record or past transgressions have no bearing here. Maybe this is beyond the reach of understanding of you and your one-man fan club (or my one-man hate club, whichever the case may be). But we're focusing on NK's threat to use nukes. Is this too much of a complicated issue for you to understand? I don't give a rat's ass how "bad" the U.S. is or has been. The only point here is that Baby Huey is threatening to nuke Guam and Alaska, without the U.S. having threatened to do the same to NK.

Try to follow here:

1. NK is the only nation currently threatening to use nukes on innocent people.

2. NK is a relatively impoverished nation, but its poor citizens are kept on strict mind control by Baby Huey and his forces.

(On this point, you hysterically claim brainwashing and propaganda over on this side..... and you can't seem to see the evidence right in front of your metro-sexual nose that screams to the very same thing occurring in North Korea. But since you've made a little life for yourself in that part of the world, and married an Asian woman, you've developed this sort of blind, sick, inane "loyalty" that translates into frankly never making any sense).


LMFAO at the ever-lasting cliques in this forum.

I proudly stand alone in my opinions, and belong to no cliques.

I've argued with Brock and Lyle endlessly about Trump.

I've argued endlessly with Lyle about gun control.


But I'm firmly on their side and against yours about North ("poor little") Korea.

Meanwhile, you and little Band of 3 stick together like tapeworms in a pile of shit, and disagree with everyone else regardless of the argument.

:vd:

---

@TitoFan that is a little to tough on miles, please take it down a notch or two. I still do love him.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TitoFan

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gandalf

I take it you are still smarting over being shown to be completely ignorant when it comes to historical context, Tito. I notice you are more interested in trying to mock a balanced political position rather than actually point out that what Brock is saying is completely insane. Let's put things into context shall we. Brocks team has bombed Yemen dozens of times and killed actual people. North Korea meanwhile has once again lobbed a rocket into the sea. Yet, we have a demented madman on this forum arguing the case that North Korea should be nuked by the country dropping bombs on actual people for firing rockets into the sea. You honestly do not see how insane such a position is? I swear some of you have lost your marbles.

---

I thought it was just you who laughingly defends North Korea, until I saw that Fenster liked your post.... which makes perfect sense since Fenster has never forgiven me for mercilessly poking fun at his JMM ducked Naz conspiracy theories.

So it didn't matter that Brock dumbed it down for you..... you still insist on carrying Kim Jong-un's jock. Heh-heh.

For the record, I never agreed that NK should be nuked. I don't think anyone should be nuked. Unless of course Baby Huey really does something stupid..... then obviously there would have to be retaliation. So before you start grouping us together, actually read my posts. If.... you're capable of reading something other than your own babbling bullshit.

The U.S.'s record or past transgressions have no bearing here. Maybe this is beyond the reach of understanding of you and your one-man fan club (or my one-man hate club, whichever the case may be). But we're focusing on NK's threat to use nukes. Is this too much of a complicated issue for you to understand? I don't give a rat's ass how "bad" the U.S. is or has been. The only point here is that Baby Huey is threatening to nuke Guam and Alaska, without the U.S. having threatened to do the same to NK.

Try to follow here:

1. NK is the only nation currently threatening to use nukes on innocent people.

2. NK is a relatively impoverished nation, but its poor citizens are kept on strict mind control by Baby Huey and his forces.

(On this point, you hysterically claim brainwashing and propaganda over on this side..... and you can't seem to see the evidence right in front of your metro-sexual nose that screams to the very same thing occurring in North Korea. But since you've made a little life for yourself in that part of the world, and married an Asian woman, you've developed this sort of blind, sick, inane "loyalty" that translates into frankly never making any sense).


LMFAO at the ever-lasting cliques in this forum.

I proudly stand alone in my opinions, and belong to no cliques.

I've argued with Brock and Lyle endlessly about Trump.

I've argued endlessly with Lyle about gun control.


But I'm firmly on their side and against yours about North ("poor little") Korea.

Meanwhile, you and little Band of 3 stick together like tapeworms in a pile of shit, and disagree with everyone else regardless of the argument.

:vd:

---

So Fenster hurt your feelings too by liking my post, eh? It's a tough world for sure. :rolleyes:

Also, nobody is 'defending' anyone you nitwit. All that is happening is that hypocrisy and double standards are being pointed out. First you said I was being outlandish by saying the 1994 deal was broken by the US and then I hear this constant talk about defending North Korea as a result. It is beyond lame. I think you must have serious problems with comprehension as these things are not happening. I despise North Korea almost as much as I despise flamenco, but do carry on. What I will point out though is that your country has just been testing nuclear bombs and I hear nary a squeak from you about that, but of course you have a lot to say about the menace of North Korea. I mean after all, we know that being a centrist you get all of your information from CNN and thus you probably have zero idea that your country has been testing nuclear bombs. You certainly do not care that bombs are being dropped on Yemen right now and you do not care about nuclear testing, but you are very concerned with North Korea. I get it, you are very nuanced and clearly very informed.

As for the rest of your absurd little rant, all I see is a lot of pent up pain. My position is a balanced one argued with logic and reason. Yours is just a bizarre rant. What kind of 'bizarre loyalty that makes little sense are you talking about'? Erm, the kind of loyalty that would like the region not to be destroyed and urged on by ignorant people like yourself? The loyalty of looking at an issue from both sides rather than just look at it from the position of power? You make absolutely zero sense, you clearly have no idea what you are on about. The very fact that you keep saying I am defending North Korea shows how you just cannot even comprehend how I think. You are too blinkered and blinded by preconceived opinions and notions that you just frankly sound odd.

If you would like to discuss an issue I am able to do that, but otherwise you are just annoying. If you haven't noticed, I will have my opinion and disagree with every single person on this forum if need be. However, I will always try to back up what I say with evidence. On this issue, too many of you lack balance.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by walrus

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TitoFan

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gandalf

I take it you are still smarting over being shown to be completely ignorant when it comes to historical context, Tito. I notice you are more interested in trying to mock a balanced political position rather than actually point out that what Brock is saying is completely insane. Let's put things into context shall we. Brocks team has bombed Yemen dozens of times and killed actual people. North Korea meanwhile has once again lobbed a rocket into the sea. Yet, we have a demented madman on this forum arguing the case that North Korea should be nuked by the country dropping bombs on actual people for firing rockets into the sea. You honestly do not see how insane such a position is? I swear some of you have lost your marbles.

---

I thought it was just you who laughingly defends North Korea, until I saw that Fenster liked your post.... which makes perfect sense since Fenster has never forgiven me for mercilessly poking fun at his JMM ducked Naz conspiracy theories.

So it didn't matter that Brock dumbed it down for you..... you still insist on carrying Kim Jong-un's jock. Heh-heh.

For the record, I never agreed that NK should be nuked. I don't think anyone should be nuked. Unless of course Baby Huey really does something stupid..... then obviously there would have to be retaliation. So before you start grouping us together, actually read my posts. If.... you're capable of reading something other than your own babbling bullshit.

The U.S.'s record or past transgressions have no bearing here. Maybe this is beyond the reach of understanding of you and your one-man fan club (or my one-man hate club, whichever the case may be). But we're focusing on NK's threat to use nukes. Is this too much of a complicated issue for you to understand? I don't give a rat's ass how "bad" the U.S. is or has been. The only point here is that Baby Huey is threatening to nuke Guam and Alaska, without the U.S. having threatened to do the same to NK.

Try to follow here:

1. NK is the only nation currently threatening to use nukes on innocent people.

2. NK is a relatively impoverished nation, but its poor citizens are kept on strict mind control by Baby Huey and his forces.

(On this point, you hysterically claim brainwashing and propaganda over on this side..... and you can't seem to see the evidence right in front of your metro-sexual nose that screams to the very same thing occurring in North Korea. But since you've made a little life for yourself in that part of the world, and married an Asian woman, you've developed this sort of blind, sick, inane "loyalty" that translates into frankly never making any sense).


LMFAO at the ever-lasting cliques in this forum.

I proudly stand alone in my opinions, and belong to no cliques.

I've argued with Brock and Lyle endlessly about Trump.

I've argued endlessly with Lyle about gun control.


But I'm firmly on their side and against yours about North ("poor little") Korea.

Meanwhile, you and little Band of 3 stick together like tapeworms in a pile of shit, and disagree with everyone else regardless of the argument.

:vd:

---

@TitoFan that is a little to tough on miles, please take it down a notch or two. I still do love him.

---

Notice how Tito seems to have no concern about actual bombs used on actual people. Cognitive dissonance at work there.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by walrus

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TitoFan

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gandalf

I take it you are still smarting over being shown to be completely ignorant when it comes to historical context, Tito. I notice you are more interested in trying to mock a balanced political position rather than actually point out that what Brock is saying is completely insane. Let's put things into context shall we. Brocks team has bombed Yemen dozens of times and killed actual people. North Korea meanwhile has once again lobbed a rocket into the sea. Yet, we have a demented madman on this forum arguing the case that North Korea should be nuked by the country dropping bombs on actual people for firing rockets into the sea. You honestly do not see how insane such a position is? I swear some of you have lost your marbles.

---

I thought it was just you who laughingly defends North Korea, until I saw that Fenster liked your post.... which makes perfect sense since Fenster has never forgiven me for mercilessly poking fun at his JMM ducked Naz conspiracy theories.

So it didn't matter that Brock dumbed it down for you..... you still insist on carrying Kim Jong-un's jock. Heh-heh.

For the record, I never agreed that NK should be nuked. I don't think anyone should be nuked. Unless of course Baby Huey really does something stupid..... then obviously there would have to be retaliation. So before you start grouping us together, actually read my posts. If.... you're capable of reading something other than your own babbling bullshit.

The U.S.'s record or past transgressions have no bearing here. Maybe this is beyond the reach of understanding of you and your one-man fan club (or my one-man hate club, whichever the case may be). But we're focusing on NK's threat to use nukes. Is this too much of a complicated issue for you to understand? I don't give a rat's ass how "bad" the U.S. is or has been. The only point here is that Baby Huey is threatening to nuke Guam and Alaska, without the U.S. having threatened to do the same to NK.

Try to follow here:

1. NK is the only nation currently threatening to use nukes on innocent people.

2. NK is a relatively impoverished nation, but its poor citizens are kept on strict mind control by Baby Huey and his forces.

(On this point, you hysterically claim brainwashing and propaganda over on this side..... and you can't seem to see the evidence right in front of your metro-sexual nose that screams to the very same thing occurring in North Korea. But since you've made a little life for yourself in that part of the world, and married an Asian woman, you've developed this sort of blind, sick, inane "loyalty" that translates into frankly never making any sense).


LMFAO at the ever-lasting cliques in this forum.

I proudly stand alone in my opinions, and belong to no cliques.

I've argued with Brock and Lyle endlessly about Trump.

I've argued endlessly with Lyle about gun control.


But I'm firmly on their side and against yours about North ("poor little") Korea.

Meanwhile, you and little Band of 3 stick together like tapeworms in a pile of shit, and disagree with everyone else regardless of the argument.

:vd:

---

@TitoFan that is a little to tough on miles, please take it down a notch or two. I still do love him.

---

I have voted for him for FGOTY unfailingly. Doesn't that balance out how I mistreat him on Korea?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by walrus

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gandalf

Keep on swallowing the kool Aid, Brock and Walrus. Most people can think a little deeper than that. Beanz and my own comparison were sound ones. The trouble is up there in the Trump orifice, you just cannot see properly.

Context time: Right now the US is carrying out drills and exercises against NK. As usual NK responds. The media mostly hush hushes the former but makes 'big drama show' out of the latter.

Then you have uninformed nut jobs wanting nuclear war. For two people who don't like fake news, they sure have you wrapped around their finger.

---

Dude those happen with every military all over the world. Look the bottom line is nothing will happen with nk. Just blustery words that have been reiterated since the fifties. If u support how best Korea operates, building missiles to the ire of not just the us but to the world community bully to you. They clap when missiles launch as best Korean citizens die of starvation. If they just cut the shit they would get foreign aid up the ass and people wouldn't suffer as much. If military action were taken your country(second best Korea) would lose its capital in a fire ball. We have no interest in seeing that happen. If best Korea did launch against a us territory the response would be automatic and terribly your country miles would go

---

Miles sees no prob at all with NK launching missiles over Japan. He will just deflect it to Libya or some shit. Still no comment about NK launching missiles over Japan. Miles harbours a deep hate for Japan for cutting off 10,000 Korean noses a few centuries back.

FUCK JAPAN, RIGHT MILES?? FUCK JAPAN!!! RIGHT MILES???

HOW DARE JAPAN NOT APPRECIATE MISSILES OVER ITS AIRSPACE OVER MASSIVELY POPULATED CENTERS. HOW DARE THEY, RIGHT MILES?
@TitoFan so right, hermano, only the sound of silence from them whackos. They will never answer questions, its the British way

These are just the most ridiculously, stupid posts I think I have ever been subjected to. I have been to Japan several times and would consider working there in the future. I love the place. However, they have not been bombed by anyone. It is a fact that they carried out war crimes and occupied nations much as the others continue to do today. However, I respect that they became a nation of peace and built their prosperty on hard work and innovation rather than continuing to oppress and dominate people. In turn I would say that none of you have anything to say about actual bombs that drop on actual people. Deafening silence in fact.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gandalf

These are just the most ridiculously, stupid posts I think I have ever been subjected to. I have been to Japan several times and would consider working there in the future. I love the place. However, they have not been bombed by anyone. It is a fact that they carried out war crimes and occupied nations much as the others continue to do today. However, I respect that they became a nation of peace and built their prosperty on hard work and innovation rather than continuing to oppress and dominate people. In turn I would say that none of you have anything to say about actual bombs that drop on actual people. Deafening silence in fact.

---

you continue trying to tie the 2 things together, why not throw in slavery whlle youre at it? I'll do it for ya, howzabout it? Everybody weave wittle Kowea awone because .............SLAVEWY and, and ..................WUSSIA!!!!

Are you really so dense that you cannot compute elementary logic? Actual bombs are being dropped on actual people and it is in one ear and out the other. Going by your own logic why are you not advocating the destruction of your own country? It is because you are a hypocrite.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gandalf

Are you really so dense that you cannot compute elementary logic? Actual bombs are being dropped on actual people and it is in one ear and out the other. Going by your own logic why are you not advocating the destruction of your own country? It is because you are a hypocrite.

---

It is not logical to tie the two things together. It is not logical to compare Yemen having bombs dropped because there are ongoing military operations there are terrorists there how can you compare that to launching a missile over Japan which endangers Japanese lives and should be responded to? Is Japan currently involved in Terrorist activity like Yemen? Is Japan currently having political and civil turmoil and a Civil War and unrest? You are the illogical one because the two scenarios cannot be compared in any way. The United States is not launching missiles over neutral, peaceful countries have you stopped to consider that?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gandalf

However, I respect that they became a nation of peace and built their prosperty on hard work and innovation rather than continuing to oppress and dominate people.

---

Yeah that's what 2 Atom Bombs on the chin does to a country of foaming at the mouth rabid totalitarian Imperialists.....AND the United States built their economy bigger and better than ever, you're welcome!

These freaking pacifists marxists Rainbow Coalition people are so against violence they should become vegetarians. Hey miles are you against violence against cows and chickens?