interesting article about GGG's legacy

The Key to this bullshit is that Team Canelo, who regardless of what anyone thinks, drew the 1st fight and won the 2nd fight. so why do they have to chase the Loser's team to push for the fight?
Because it's all about risk/reward. Canelo cannot / will not fight another live opponent and blow the hype train up.
Worst case scenario, he loses to GGG, he can then get a 4th fucking fight making even more dough and by that time GGG will be near to 40 years old ffs.
ok, the 2nd fight was a good fight, but so would a fight with either of them against Jacobs, Charlo , etc. so why does anyone want to see any more of this horseshit?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Primo Carnera

The Key to this bullshit is that Team Canelo, who regardless of what anyone thinks, drew the 1st fight and won the 2nd fight. so why do they have to chase the Loser's team to push for the fight?
Because it's all about risk/reward. Canelo cannot / will not fight another live opponent and blow the hype train up.
Worst case scenario, he loses to GGG, he can then get a 4th fucking fight making even more dough and by that time GGG will be near to 40 years old ffs.
ok, the 2nd fight was a good fight, but so would a fight with either of them against Jacobs, Charlo , etc. so why does anyone want to see any more of this horseshit?

---

That’s what I think. Worst case scenario he loses to GGG and gets a fourth fight. In a way, that’s a scenario for him because it creates an excuse to avoid other middleweights for even longer.

Yeah, it just seems stale. At least with Marquez/Pac you had fights inbetween to marinate it each time. GGG/Canelo once a year and that's about it is a bit dull without other wins and intrigue to build it.

Well, Canelo did take on the dangerous Fielding in between, for whatever that's worth. Wait... that was in another division. Never mind.