Printable View
Quote:
Originally Posted by Master
I think he is on about Joe Smith who wrote it.Quote:
Originally Posted by TitoFanQuote:
Originally Posted by NoSavingByTheBell
What part of "I don't see Wilder having any automatic advantage over Bowe" did you NOT understand?
His post directly followed mine, and Smith hadn't even posted on here yet. Easy to see how I came to my conclusion.
Joe Smith deleted his reply which is why it appears that way. Joe is retracting a lot of his posts now. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by TitoFanQuote:
Originally Posted by MasterI think he is on about Joe Smith who wrote it.Quote:
Originally Posted by TitoFanQuote:
Originally Posted by NoSavingByTheBell
What part of "I don't see Wilder having any automatic advantage over Bowe" did you NOT understand?
His post directly followed mine, and Smith hadn't even posted on here yet. Easy to see how I came to my conclusion.
Why is primo not sane?Quote:
Originally Posted by joe smithWilder is raw and no better technique than the fighters you criticise in the 1920's. This is you're comment so prove they we're show the matches 3rd time asking this, why is this taking hrs to show?Quote:
Originally Posted by MasterJoe Smith deleted his reply which is why it appears that way. Joe is retracting a lot of his posts now. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by TitoFanQuote:
Originally Posted by MasterI think he is on about Joe Smith who wrote it.Quote:
Originally Posted by TitoFanQuote:
Originally Posted by NoSavingByTheBell
What part of "I don't see Wilder having any automatic advantage over Bowe" did you NOT understand?
His post directly followed mine, and Smith hadn't even posted on here yet. Easy to see how I came to my conclusion.
And I can't retract anything cause I can't not see advances beteeen era's
Wilder is raw and no better technique than the fighters you criticise in the 1920's. This is you're comment so prove they we're show the matches 3rd time asking this, why is this taking hrs to show?Quote:
Originally Posted by MasterWhy is primo not sane?Quote:
Originally Posted by joe smithWilder is raw and no better technique than the fighters you criticise in the 1920's. This is you're comment so prove they we're show the matches 3rd time asking this, why is this taking hrs to show?Quote:
Originally Posted by MasterJoe Smith deleted his reply which is why it appears that way. Joe is retracting a lot of his posts now. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by TitoFanQuote:
Originally Posted by MasterI think he is on about Joe Smith who wrote it.Quote:
Originally Posted by TitoFanQuote:
Originally Posted by NoSavingByTheBell
Wilder is raw and no better technique than the fighters you criticise in the 1920's. This is you're comment so prove they we're show the matches 3rd time asking this, why is this taking hrs to show?
What part of "I don't see Wilder having any automatic advantage over Bowe" did you NOT understand?
His post directly followed mine, and Smith hadn't even posted on here yet. Easy to see how I came to my conclusion.
And I can't retract anything cause I can't not see advances beteeen era's
Exactly Master.Quote:
Originally Posted by MasterI think he is on about Joe Smith who wrote it.Quote:
Originally Posted by TitoFanQuote:
Originally Posted by NoSavingByTheBell
What part of "I don't see Wilder having any automatic advantage over Bowe" did you NOT understand?
Yep.Quote:
Originally Posted by MasterJoe Smith deleted his reply which is why it appears that way. Joe is retracting a lot of his posts now. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by TitoFanQuote:
Originally Posted by MasterI think he is on about Joe Smith who wrote it.Quote:
Originally Posted by TitoFanQuote:
Originally Posted by NoSavingByTheBell
What part of "I don't see Wilder having any automatic advantage over Bowe" did you NOT understand?
His post directly followed mine, and Smith hadn't even posted on here yet. Easy to see how I came to my conclusion.