What would be a better fight Cotto-Gatti or Cotto-Castillo

Gatti is not slightly flawed,nowadays anyway,to me,he is nothing more than a club fighter,albeit an incredibly exciting one who's defence is his chin. Cotto has a few flaws but he is young and with time,he will get better and there are only a few flaws.I agree it would be a good fight but Castillo is more dangerous,Gattis is damaged goods now and it won't impress Cotto naysayers if he wins whereas if he even fights Castillo,he will gain respect,see where I am coming from? A loss to Castillo would still earn him respect as long as he performed well whereas any type of loss to Gatti will look seriously bad at this stage!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by chamiley

Bob arum said if cotto beats mallignagi and castillo beats corrales, then it will be cotto-castillo. arturo gatti in his press conference with baldomir said he wants to fight cotto after baldomir. what would be a better fight.

I cannot see cotto beating castillo, as castillo is more experienced, has tremendous power and granite chin.

while gatti-cotto can be a classic, although I would favor cotto to win this fight, it would be action packed with lots of knockdowns.

---

I think we are about to see a new side of Arturo Gattti ...I think he is ready to prove he is the true champion. I personally can't wait to see him beat Baldomir in July! :)