Printable View
I did watch the Marquez Pacquiao fight and even the Larios Pacquiao fight, Pacquiao is wide open to counter shots and Hamed would catch him. I think you forget the only person to beat Hamed did it by staying back and NOT forcing the action or trading with him which are 2 things Pacquiao would do and get knocked out for.
i wonder if naz can still throw a strong counter after he eats a punch from pac. it didnt happened for mab,jmm or em all are decent counter punchers. the fighter who lands a punch first always has the advantage!
i heard it alot of times, that pacs head on assault would be perfect for so and so that pacs gonna be kod for that. does pacs style put him into trouble? not! lets not forget also that in every fight hes style improves alot. everyone he fought taught they can beat pac because he is so easy to counter. but ended up losing because they cant take pacs punches.
he didn't look improved against Larios, it looked like he lead with the same 3 punch combo jab left hand jab and an occasional left or right hook when he was close inside.
Pacman
pac is deff open to counters but since the 1st morales fight. pacs learned a few tricks right out of Nard's book to deal with counters. people expect him to just jump in at people but now he does some faints to lure counters and then throw his lead(just like in Nard-tarver) and unload a combination. its one of the few reasons EM and Larios coundnt see the punches coming.
but the fight between Naz-Pac can go either way NazTKO/PacTKO..Naz has never dealt with a fighter as fast and as relentless with as much power as pac..while Pacs never fought a fighter as awkward, as tricky(he might get into pacs head) and with as much power...neither have a weak chin and neither has a weak heart(Naz left the fight game cuz he had all the money he wanted and lost his interrest in boxing even before the MAB fight)
In your opinion ;DQuote:
Originally Posted by Starr
but agree to disagree!
I agree with Starr .
Barrera laid out the blueprint on how to beat Nas . Pac fights in the opposite way
Kind of selling Manny short, basically saying that he wouldn't make any adjustments for that ugly little troll. Personally I think Morales, Rocky Juarez, and Pacman all would of beaten him because he was a clown by the time he got to Barerra. It's common knowledge he wasn't training very hard, doing things his way on his time. You can argue prime, not prime whatever. With all that talent he still didn't have the heart, attitude, or desire of a champion, which is the same thing as not having any physical talents at all when it comes to fighting the elites of your division.
pac will lay a more effecient way to beat naz! ehehehehehQuote:
Originally Posted by GAME
I think this one would be a blinder. Both fighters are explosive and both (Hamed particularly) can bang. I fancy a Hamed-Kelly style affair. Its so difficult to call since both men could end it with one punch. I think in the end Hamed's technical flaws would mean one big shot too many. I always thought Hamed was a bit chinny.
Pacman with a 6th Round TKO (and Ring fight of Year).
The cheaky cow ;D, I stated that first >:madQuote:
Originally Posted by GAME
Only joking Starr... You're the girl ;)
lmao cheeky cow, i'd never hear that in America
good stuff
Fuckin ho!
Hows that?
;D
i really prefer cheeky cow, it's got a nice ring to it
I think that Pacquaio's coming forward style was made for Hamed. Manny Pacquiao fan I thought Manny would stop him, but Manny really hasn't shown adjustments and that MArquez fight keeps sticking in the back of my mind, I think Hamed would win now. But it would be a slugfest from beginning to end.
Has she 8)Quote:
Originally Posted by raleights