;D I know exactly what you mean.
Printable View
;D I know exactly what you mean.
I picked Lacy to knock out Joe Calzaghe.
I thought Lacy was a monsterous newcomer, and my opinion of Joe back the was just that he was another overhyped fighter from across the pond who was coming to the end of his rope and was due for a loss against a solid fighter.
I thought Trinidad was going to destroy Wright inside of 6 rounds.... That fight made me sick to my stomach.Quote:
Originally Posted by brazilianbomber
I also throught Joppy would be Tito's toughest test at the time.....
Naseem Hamed to KO Marco Antonio Barrera
like Fenster was saying, huge upsets aren't really bad picks.Quote:
Originally Posted by LEGION
You were right to pick Lewis to beat both of those guys. He was the better fighter, he should have won.
And CCs to J Buddy and No Contest for coming clean on their Gatti-Mayweather picks ;D You were not alone at least.
I've had a good share of bad predictions.
Ouma over Roman
Gatti over Baldomir
Eubank over Thompson I & II
Tyson over Lewis :-X
Holyfield over Donald - Now that I think back on it an look closely I realize how fucken blind I am. :(
Paez over Pernell :-X
Man I've had some bad ones almost as bad as miles :o
Recently I think the worst was taking Simms to KO Alcine, and even went as far as to say
that Simms is the man at 154 and has the skill set to stay undefeated at 154
Alcine has little to no chance.
And there goes another belt from the US to Canada.
Whoever predicted an Earl win over Khan. ;D
erik morales vs pac 3
kessler vs. clazaghe i call a 5th rd ko
holyfield vs. sultan
As you know I am playing catch up in the prediciton contest......that is why I picked Earl (and the fact that he was game with Katsidis). I am sure Saddo picked Earl for the same reason.Quote:
Originally Posted by CutMeMick
All the guys who picked Hatton to win LOL ;D only joking guys don't take it to heart.