Re: Floyd has the bestresume in boxing.
I read too many things to multi-quote everything. Bottom line:
-Floyd's resume is up there, but Oscar's is better.
-Someone mentioned Holyfield and I do think his resume is just as good as Oscars, arguably better.
-Floyd being called a "cherry-picker" is probably because people criticize him for supposedly ducking the elite welterweights. Fighting an old Oscar twice and a person who proved not at his best in the welterweight division, Hatton, disgust many.
-Hatton does have a huge following in this forum.
-"hattonthehammer" is ABSOLUTELY just asking for it!!
Re: Floyd has the bestresume in boxing.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Unknowndonor
If it's just on competition, would a fighter that fought the top 10, but lost 6 of those be considered better than a fighter that fought a mixed half of the top 30 and won em all?
So hear you are clearly comparing Zab Judah to Floyd Mayweather at WW right? ;D
Re: Floyd has the bestresume in boxing.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Violent Demise
Quote:
Originally Posted by
hattonthehammer
Quote:
Originally Posted by
JT Rock
No mention of Hatton?
Havent you heard
Hatton is now officially an average, washed up fighter after his close shave
120-108 win against lazcano.
:biting:
The fact that 2 judges scored it 120-108 for Hatton shows they were in the pocket. No matter how many knock downs Lazcano would of scored he was going to win
Im with VD on this one.....Lazcano would have needed a ko just to get a draw that night
Re: Floyd has the bestresume in boxing.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
killersheep
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Unknowndonor
If it's just on competition, would a fighter that fought the top 10, but lost 6 of those be considered better than a fighter that fought a mixed half of the top 30 and won em all?
So hear you are clearly comparing Zab Judah to Floyd Mayweather at WW right? ;D
LOL,
Didnt have any particular fighters in mind. I put that statement in because how do you define resume? Who you have fought? Or who you have fought and won? If it's who you have fought, then Holy and Oscar have the best resumes, if it's who you have fought and won, then I think Floyd gets the nod, that's all.
Re: Floyd has the bestresume in boxing.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Unknowndonor
Quote:
Originally Posted by
killersheep
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Unknowndonor
If it's just on competition, would a fighter that fought the top 10, but lost 6 of those be considered better than a fighter that fought a mixed half of the top 30 and won em all?
So hear you are clearly comparing Zab Judah to Floyd Mayweather at WW right? ;D
LOL,
Didnt have any particular fighters in mind. I put that statement in because how do you define resume? Who you have fought? Or who you have fought and won? If it's who you have fought, then Holy and Oscar have the best resumes, if it's who you have fought and won, then I think Floyd gets the nod, that's all.
Yeah I get what you are saying, I just thought that comparison was a perfect example of what you were saying. Judah love him or hate him has fought more top 10 welters than anyone, although Cotto is cleaning up the list nicely.
