-
Re: Interested In Lyle's Opinion of Sarah Palin
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Trainer Monkey
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CFH
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Trainer Monkey
The "experts" have done a magnificent job of re-writing history, sorry it still stands,every reliable poll at the time had Carter winning the election without the Hostage Crisis
November 4 1980 Election
January 20th all Hostages released
January 20th Reagan Inaugural Address
What would a bunch of liberal, left-wing academics have to gain by re-writing history in favor of the Republicans? How exactly did they re-write history? Their interest is in facts.
So all my extremely liberal profs and the writers of the text books are all part of some right-wing conspiracy? ok.... :rolleyes:
What is a reliable poll? They are inherently flawed and far from reliable.
Liberal,son you aint been paying attention,the William Kristols,and Milton Friendmans of the world have been taking over academia
When I was your age Ayn Rand was barely considered toilet paper,now its required reading
Well Michael Harrington is now forgotten,Mother Jones is nothing but a magazine,and Bill Buckley got everything he ever wanted
And the result on every single indicator,is absolute disaster.
No,I refuse to let the repugnants weasel out,saying its bad on both sides,or we didnt really want that.They got everything they ever wanted,have been striving for since 1968 and its a complete mess. Dont give me the defeatist "Oh well theyre all the same" or let them weasel out. You shit on your self your supposed to smell bad.
An old way of dealing with a chicken killing dog,you tie that last chicken around its neck,and let it rot.
That dog wont kill anymore chickens
I smell chicken
What in the hell are you talking about? Seriously.
I've never read Ayn Rand, let alone have it been assigned as required reading. I've never heard or read anything from any of the people you mention.
I live and go to school in Canada, where, particularily in academia, liberalism is the norm. My profs are almost universally self-described left-wing liberal socialists, to the point where I find it bothersome at times. Who are you to tell me, and them, what their views are when you have no idea who they even are?
And it is bad on both sides. It's not defeatist to say that. It's defeatist to say, well, this is what we have and it's the best we can do. The democrats are slightly less fucked than the republicans, it doesn't make them good.
I really don't understand what you're trying to say. You can generalize all you want, but it's not applicable to my situation, which you know nothing about.
-
Re: Interested In Lyle's Opinion of Sarah Palin
As an example, Johnny Got His Gun was required reading in one of my courses, what a piece of right-wing propaganda that is. In the same class, I had to write a paper essentially ripping apart the Reagan administration for my final.
-
Re: Interested In Lyle's Opinion of Sarah Palin
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BoxingGorilla
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Trainer Monkey
Like most urban rumours,I can allready spot the lie.
Actually it was a Texas speaker of the House 20 years ago that asked handicapped people to stand and be recognised.
Isnt it fun when you pay attention to history? You dont even need Snopes then,you just remember it happening
Rumor?! Lie?!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C2mzbuRgnI4
Chuck Graham is awesome. He is my state senator and I get to vote for him in elections.
-
Re: Interested In Lyle's Opinion of Sarah Palin
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CFH
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Trainer Monkey
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CFH
I think what he's saying is that the differences are somewhat superficial. The government is still going to be run at the behest of big business. A power structure that represents and favors the interests of the elites will still be in place. Special interest groups will still be dominant. There will still only be two real choices in regards to leadership etc. No real fundamental changes will occur.
It will still be a choice between two evils so to speak. At least I think that's his point.
Bullshit
Im a little older so
Republicans have controlled the White House for all but 12 of the last 40 years
The only prosperous years the country had was in 8 of those 12 not the other 28
5 Recessions, two fuel crisis,erosion of civil rights 3 different stock market crashes,2 major bailouts of financial institutions should be a wee bit of hint of what the difference is
Yeah, there are some differences, obviously, but the fundamentals are still the same. Big business still hands out tons of cash to further their own interests. The elites still have their priorities pushed to the fore etc. Everything I said before is true.
I'm not saying the Rep. and Dem. are the same in all ways, but fundamentally they are. The every recession was not purely a result of the Republican party either. Look at the economy when Carter was in change, that was one of, if not the, most important factions that lead to Reagan.
The DEms are better, no doubt, but they're not a bunch of white-cloaked saints. They're the lesser of two evils, but they're still a bunch of self-serving, interest-representing politicians.
That being said, I hope the Rep.'s never get elected again. Hell, I wouldn't shed a tear if each one of them was executed.
The economy under Carter was not his fault, it was bad because Nixon ran up bills he cxouldn't pay and so he ended the link between gold and the dollar. The resulting inflation required double digit interest rates to kill it. In the same way when Americans are paying $10 for a gallon of gas five years from now they won't blame it on the Bush administration but on whoever's in power then. But it unquestionably will be the fault of the current guys.
You're right about the lesser of two evils thing. But my Infallibility tells me that the United States body politic is going to take a sharp turn to the left over the next decade, even the GOP. The Dems may even become worth electing.
-
Re: Interested In Lyle's Opinion of Sarah Palin
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CFH
As an example, Johnny Got His Gun was required reading in one of my courses, what a piece of right-wing propaganda that is. In the same class, I had to write a paper essentially ripping apart the Reagan administration for my final.
And in the states Slaughterhouse 5 is censored in most school districts
Welcome to the wacky world we call Americaland
-
Re: Interested In Lyle's Opinion of Sarah Palin
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CFH
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Trainer Monkey
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CFH
What would a bunch of liberal, left-wing academics have to gain by re-writing history in favor of the Republicans? How exactly did they re-write history? Their interest is in facts.
So all my extremely liberal profs and the writers of the text books are all part of some right-wing conspiracy? ok.... :rolleyes:
What is a reliable poll? They are inherently flawed and far from reliable.
Liberal,son you aint been paying attention,the William Kristols,and Milton Friendmans of the world have been taking over academia
When I was your age Ayn Rand was barely considered toilet paper,now its required reading
Well Michael Harrington is now forgotten,Mother Jones is nothing but a magazine,and Bill Buckley got everything he ever wanted
And the result on every single indicator,is absolute disaster.
No,I refuse to let the repugnants weasel out,saying its bad on both sides,or we didnt really want that.They got everything they ever wanted,have been striving for since 1968 and its a complete mess. Dont give me the defeatist "Oh well theyre all the same" or let them weasel out. You shit on your self your supposed to smell bad.
An old way of dealing with a chicken killing dog,you tie that last chicken around its neck,and let it rot.
That dog wont kill anymore chickens
I smell chicken
What in the hell are you talking about? Seriously.
I've never read Ayn Rand, let alone have it been assigned as required reading. I've never heard or read anything from any of the people you mention.
I live and go to school in Canada, where, particularily in academia, liberalism is the norm. My profs are almost universally self-described left-wing liberal socialists, to the point where I find it bothersome at times. Who are you to tell me, and them, what their views are when you have no idea who they even are?
And it is bad on both sides. It's not defeatist to say that. It's defeatist to say, well, this is what we have and it's the best we can do. The democrats are slightly less fucked than the republicans, it doesn't make them good.
I really don't understand what you're trying to say. You can generalize all you want, but it's not applicable to my situation, which you know nothing about.
Son you dont get it,as Ameica goes,so goeth the world
Lets look at some of our Academic shining lights,
Milton Friedman,resurrected the often failed idea of lazziez faire economics,often quoted as the source for "trickle down economic theory"
Irving Kristol,founder of the Neo-conservative movement,and 1992 recipient of the Medal Of Freedom from Bush 1
William Kristol founder of the ultra right Weekly Standard
Lets look at popular American Political commentators
Rush Limbaugh,often lies,failed sports commentator for the Kansas City Royals
Sean Hannity-Lies even more often,when he isnt yelling at people,former steel worker
Bill Orielly-Former tabloid reporter,he lies pretty often too
Michael Savage-Former herbalist
Michelle Malkin-Why is she famous again?
Ann Coulter-McCarthy Blacklist apologist
Dick Morris-Political advisor turned prostitute toe licker
William Bennet-Former drug Czar with a two pack a day habit,his gambling habit,a little more so
Andrea Peyser-Has one issue,"I hate losing my parking space to UN diplomats"
Neil Boortz-Speech writer for staunch segregationist Lestor Maddox
Man what a collection of great thought,this country listens to every day of its life
-
Re: Interested In Lyle's Opinion of Sarah Palin
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Trainer Monkey
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CFH
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Trainer Monkey
Liberal,son you aint been paying attention,the William Kristols,and Milton Friendmans of the world have been taking over academia
When I was your age Ayn Rand was barely considered toilet paper,now its required reading
Well Michael Harrington is now forgotten,Mother Jones is nothing but a magazine,and Bill Buckley got everything he ever wanted
And the result on every single indicator,is absolute disaster.
No,I refuse to let the repugnants weasel out,saying its bad on both sides,or we didnt really want that.They got everything they ever wanted,have been striving for since 1968 and its a complete mess. Dont give me the defeatist "Oh well theyre all the same" or let them weasel out. You shit on your self your supposed to smell bad.
An old way of dealing with a chicken killing dog,you tie that last chicken around its neck,and let it rot.
That dog wont kill anymore chickens
I smell chicken
What in the hell are you talking about? Seriously.
I've never read Ayn Rand, let alone have it been assigned as required reading. I've never heard or read anything from any of the people you mention.
I live and go to school in Canada, where, particularily in academia, liberalism is the norm. My profs are almost universally self-described left-wing liberal socialists, to the point where I find it bothersome at times. Who are you to tell me, and them, what their views are when you have no idea who they even are?
And it is bad on both sides. It's not defeatist to say that. It's defeatist to say, well, this is what we have and it's the best we can do. The democrats are slightly less fucked than the republicans, it doesn't make them good.
I really don't understand what you're trying to say. You can generalize all you want, but it's not applicable to my situation, which you know nothing about.
Son you dont get it,as Ameica goes,so goeth the world
Lets look at some of our Academic shining lights,
Milton Friedman,resurrected the often failed idea of lazziez faire economics,often quoted as the source for "trickle down economic theory"
Irving Kristol,founder of the Neo-conservative movement,and 1992 recipient of the Medal Of Freedom from Bush 1
William Kristol founder of the ultra right Weekly Standard
Lets look at popular American Political commentators
Rush Limbaugh,often lies,failed sports commentator for the Kansas City Royals
Sean Hannity-Lies even more often,when he isnt yelling at people,former steel worker
Bill Orielly-Former tabloid reporter,he lies pretty often too
Michael Savage-Former herbalist
Michelle Malkin-Why is she famous again?
Ann Coulter-McCarthy Blacklist apologist
Dick Morris-Political advisor turned prostitute toe licker
William Bennet-Former drug Czar with a two pack a day habit,his gambling habit,a little more so
Andrea Peyser-Has one issue,"I hate losing my parking space to UN diplomats"
Neil Boortz-Speech writer for staunch segregationist Lestor Maddox
Man what a collection of great thought,this country listens to every day of its life
No, you quite obviously don't get it. In regards to what we are discussing - remember you were telling me how the neo-cons had rewritten history and somehow corrupted my education - I don't give a flying fuck what the supposed academic situation in the States is. It is in no way applicable to the prevailing notions here and is irrelevant to the conversation. Just because I'm studying American history does not mean that the books we use were even written by Americans (though in some cases they are, obviously). It has been demonstrated to me time and again that MY professors, while admitting their biases, are able to present as objective a position as possible.
You were trying to tell me that these people you mention are somehow rewriting history and that my education has been corrupted by it. I told you that I have never been assigned anything by those people, that opinions like theirs are obviously considered (as should ALL opinions) in relevant situations, but by no means are they presented as truthful or as anything more than what they are: biased, partisan, right-wing objects of scorn who are blatantly pushing agendas. I can assure you that liberalism and left-wing ideals are alive and well in the halls of Canadian universities, I know, I am heading up to one for a history class in about an hour.
But please, feel free to tell me more about the perspectives of the people who are my professors, despite the facts that I am the one actually listening to their words and opinions and that you have never met them, have no idea who they are, and are making baseless assumptions based on the situation in the States, which is somehow supposed to have injected some kind of bias/agenda into my education.
The people you named are all influential idiots. So what? It has little or no bearing on the positions of the people who's work I have been assigned to study. Just because your country listens to them does not mean many other people do not view them with anything more the derision.
-
Re: Interested In Lyle's Opinion of Sarah Palin
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CFH
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Trainer Monkey
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CFH
What in the hell are you talking about? Seriously.
I've never read Ayn Rand, let alone have it been assigned as required reading. I've never heard or read anything from any of the people you mention.
I live and go to school in Canada, where, particularily in academia, liberalism is the norm. My profs are almost universally self-described left-wing liberal socialists, to the point where I find it bothersome at times. Who are you to tell me, and them, what their views are when you have no idea who they even are?
And it is bad on both sides. It's not defeatist to say that. It's defeatist to say, well, this is what we have and it's the best we can do. The democrats are slightly less fucked than the republicans, it doesn't make them good.
I really don't understand what you're trying to say. You can generalize all you want, but it's not applicable to my situation, which you know nothing about.
Son you dont get it,as Ameica goes,so goeth the world
Lets look at some of our Academic shining lights,
Milton Friedman,resurrected the often failed idea of lazziez faire economics,often quoted as the source for "trickle down economic theory"
Irving Kristol,founder of the Neo-conservative movement,and 1992 recipient of the Medal Of Freedom from Bush 1
William Kristol founder of the ultra right Weekly Standard
Lets look at popular American Political commentators
Rush Limbaugh,often lies,failed sports commentator for the Kansas City Royals
Sean Hannity-Lies even more often,when he isnt yelling at people,former steel worker
Bill Orielly-Former tabloid reporter,he lies pretty often too
Michael Savage-Former herbalist
Michelle Malkin-Why is she famous again?
Ann Coulter-McCarthy Blacklist apologist
Dick Morris-Political advisor turned prostitute toe licker
William Bennet-Former drug Czar with a two pack a day habit,his gambling habit,a little more so
Andrea Peyser-Has one issue,"I hate losing my parking space to UN diplomats"
Neil Boortz-Speech writer for staunch segregationist Lestor Maddox
Man what a collection of great thought,this country listens to every day of its life
No, you quite obviously don't get it. In regards to what we are discussing - remember you were telling me how the neo-cons had rewritten history and somehow corrupted my education - I don't give a flying fuck what the supposed academic situation in the States is. It is in no way applicable to the prevailing notions here and is irrelevant to the conversation. Just because I'm studying American history does not mean that the books we use were even written by Americans (though in some cases they are, obviously). It has been demonstrated to me time and again that MY professors, while admitting their biases, are able to present as objective a position as possible.
You were trying to tell me that these people you mention are somehow rewriting history and that my education has been corrupted by it. I told you that I have never been assigned anything by those people, that opinions like theirs are obviously considered (as should ALL opinions) in relevant situations, but by no means are they presented as truthful or as anything more than what they are: biased, partisan, right-wing objects of scorn who are blatantly pushing agendas. I can assure you that liberalism and left-wing ideals are alive and well in the halls of Canadian universities, I know, I am heading up to one for a history class in about an hour.
But please, feel free to tell me more about the perspectives of the people who are my professors, despite the facts that I am the one actually listening to their words and opinions and that you have never met them, have no idea who they are, and are making baseless assumptions based on the situation in the States, which is somehow supposed to have injected some kind of bias/agenda into my education.
The people you named are all influential idiots. So what? It has little or no bearing on the positions of the people who's work I have been assigned to study. Just because your country listens to them does not mean many other people do not view them with anything more the derision.
Hate to break it to you,yeah,your text books are written by Americans,most of the major text book firms in the western hemisphere are from Dallas Texas
And as they say it is,thus it is dutifully repeated in other textbooks
Isnt it fun,how idiots with large ammounts of money can just change reality if it isnt convienient, and doesnt tell them what they allready know
Hey you probably think of Fredrick Douglas(if you do think of Fredrick Douglas at all,not a mean thing,but how many people think of Fredrick Douglas?) as a staunch unionist
He was also one of the most vehement Pro-Slavery Presidents the nation ever had,but you wouldnt know that if you read a history book printed later then 1911.
It got scrubbed out
-
Re: Interested In Lyle's Opinion of Sarah Palin
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Trainer Monkey
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CFH
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Trainer Monkey
Son you dont get it,as Ameica goes,so goeth the world
Lets look at some of our Academic shining lights,
Milton Friedman,resurrected the often failed idea of lazziez faire economics,often quoted as the source for "trickle down economic theory"
Irving Kristol,founder of the Neo-conservative movement,and 1992 recipient of the Medal Of Freedom from Bush 1
William Kristol founder of the ultra right Weekly Standard
Lets look at popular American Political commentators
Rush Limbaugh,often lies,failed sports commentator for the Kansas City Royals
Sean Hannity-Lies even more often,when he isnt yelling at people,former steel worker
Bill Orielly-Former tabloid reporter,he lies pretty often too
Michael Savage-Former herbalist
Michelle Malkin-Why is she famous again?
Ann Coulter-McCarthy Blacklist apologist
Dick Morris-Political advisor turned prostitute toe licker
William Bennet-Former drug Czar with a two pack a day habit,his gambling habit,a little more so
Andrea Peyser-Has one issue,"I hate losing my parking space to UN diplomats"
Neil Boortz-Speech writer for staunch segregationist Lestor Maddox
Man what a collection of great thought,this country listens to every day of its life
No, you quite obviously don't get it. In regards to what we are discussing - remember you were telling me how the neo-cons had rewritten history and somehow corrupted my education - I don't give a flying fuck what the supposed academic situation in the States is. It is in no way applicable to the prevailing notions here and is irrelevant to the conversation. Just because I'm studying American history does not mean that the books we use were even written by Americans (though in some cases they are, obviously). It has been demonstrated to me time and again that MY professors, while admitting their biases, are able to present as objective a position as possible.
You were trying to tell me that these people you mention are somehow rewriting history and that my education has been corrupted by it. I told you that I have never been assigned anything by those people, that opinions like theirs are obviously considered (as should ALL opinions) in relevant situations, but by no means are they presented as truthful or as anything more than what they are: biased, partisan, right-wing objects of scorn who are blatantly pushing agendas. I can assure you that liberalism and left-wing ideals are alive and well in the halls of Canadian universities, I know, I am heading up to one for a history class in about an hour.
But please, feel free to tell me more about the perspectives of the people who are my professors, despite the facts that I am the one actually listening to their words and opinions and that you have never met them, have no idea who they are, and are making baseless assumptions based on the situation in the States, which is somehow supposed to have injected some kind of bias/agenda into my education.
The people you named are all influential idiots. So what? It has little or no bearing on the positions of the people who's work I have been assigned to study. Just because your country listens to them does not mean many other people do not view them with anything more the derision.
Hate to break it to you,yeah,your text books are written by Americans,most of the major text book firms in the western hemisphere are from Dallas Texas
And as they say it is,thus it is dutifully repeated in other textbooks
Isnt it fun,how idiots with large ammounts of money can just change reality if it isnt convienient, and doesnt tell them what they allready know
Hey you probably think of Fredrick Douglas(if you do think of Fredrick Douglas at all,not a mean thing,but how many people think of Fredrick Douglas?) as a staunch unionist
He was also one of the most vehement Pro-Slavery Presidents the nation ever had,but you wouldnt know that if you read a history book printed later then 1911.
It got scrubbed out
How would you know who writes my text books? Yes, as I said, some of them are written by Americans. However, that isn't necessarily indicitive of their political bias. Using your ridiculous logic, I guess that means you're a right-wing revisionist as well because you're an American.
How could you possibly know anything about the education I'm getting when you don't even know what school I go to or anything about anyone working there. This is preposterous and it is absurd of you to attempt to tell me about anything regards my situation. You know nothing about any of it and I can't understand why you persist in think that you do. Why don't you go and read why I posted in my last few responses again, because you've clearly missed the point. Try actually answering the questions I pose and the issues I raise. Until you do I am done responding to you and your idiotic assumptions.
-
Re: Interested In Lyle's Opinion of Sarah Palin
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CFH
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Trainer Monkey
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CFH
No, you quite obviously don't get it. In regards to what we are discussing - remember you were telling me how the neo-cons had rewritten history and somehow corrupted my education - I don't give a flying fuck what the supposed academic situation in the States is. It is in no way applicable to the prevailing notions here and is irrelevant to the conversation. Just because I'm studying American history does not mean that the books we use were even written by Americans (though in some cases they are, obviously). It has been demonstrated to me time and again that MY professors, while admitting their biases, are able to present as objective a position as possible.
You were trying to tell me that these people you mention are somehow rewriting history and that my education has been corrupted by it. I told you that I have never been assigned anything by those people, that opinions like theirs are obviously considered (as should ALL opinions) in relevant situations, but by no means are they presented as truthful or as anything more than what they are: biased, partisan, right-wing objects of scorn who are blatantly pushing agendas. I can assure you that liberalism and left-wing ideals are alive and well in the halls of Canadian universities, I know, I am heading up to one for a history class in about an hour.
But please, feel free to tell me more about the perspectives of the people who are my professors, despite the facts that I am the one actually listening to their words and opinions and that you have never met them, have no idea who they are, and are making baseless assumptions based on the situation in the States, which is somehow supposed to have injected some kind of bias/agenda into my education.
The people you named are all influential idiots. So what? It has little or no bearing on the positions of the people who's work I have been assigned to study. Just because your country listens to them does not mean many other people do not view them with anything more the derision.
Hate to break it to you,yeah,your text books are written by Americans,most of the major text book firms in the western hemisphere are from Dallas Texas
And as they say it is,thus it is dutifully repeated in other textbooks
Isnt it fun,how idiots with large ammounts of money can just change reality if it isnt convienient, and doesnt tell them what they allready know
Hey you probably think of Fredrick Douglas(if you do think of Fredrick Douglas at all,not a mean thing,but how many people think of Fredrick Douglas?) as a staunch unionist
He was also one of the most vehement Pro-Slavery Presidents the nation ever had,but you wouldnt know that if you read a history book printed later then 1911.
It got scrubbed out
How would you know who writes my text books? Yes, as I said, some of them are written by Americans. However, that isn't necessarily indicitive of their political bias. Using your ridiculous logic, I guess that means you're a right-wing revisionist as well because you're an American.
How could you possibly know anything about the education I'm getting when you don't even know what school I go to or anything about anyone working there. This is preposterous and it is absurd of you to attempt to tell me about anything regards my situation. You know nothing about any of it and I can't understand why you persist in think that you do. Why don't you go and read why I posted in my last few responses again, because you've clearly missed the point. Try actually answering the questions I pose and the issues I raise. Until you do I am done responding to you and your idiotic assumptions.
The publishing houses are based in Texas
Texas has some seriously screwed rules about what is acceptable.
If you cant get the book published,you cant read it
It makes for a pretty safe assumption
The victors control the history,and unfortunatly America is very often the victor,we have bigger bombs.
We've skewed the entire history of the western hemisphere
We didnt invade Grenada to make Ronnie look tough after he cut and ran from Lebanon.
We did it because there were 30 cubans with power tools looking to bring down western civilization by building an airport
We didnt invade Panama to cover up a drug deal gone bad in the Iran Contra scandal
We did it to protect the western hemisphere from the dictator who two years earlier we praised for him helping us fight drugs
-
Re: Interested In Lyle's Opinion of Sarah Palin
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Trainer Monkey
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CFH
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Trainer Monkey
Hate to break it to you,yeah,your text books are written by Americans,most of the major text book firms in the western hemisphere are from Dallas Texas
And as they say it is,thus it is dutifully repeated in other textbooks
Isnt it fun,how idiots with large ammounts of money can just change reality if it isnt convienient, and doesnt tell them what they allready know
Hey you probably think of Fredrick Douglas(if you do think of Fredrick Douglas at all,not a mean thing,but how many people think of Fredrick Douglas?) as a staunch unionist
He was also one of the most vehement Pro-Slavery Presidents the nation ever had,but you wouldnt know that if you read a history book printed later then 1911.
It got scrubbed out
How would you know who writes my text books? Yes, as I said, some of them are written by Americans. However, that isn't necessarily indicitive of their political bias. Using your ridiculous logic, I guess that means you're a right-wing revisionist as well because you're an American.
How could you possibly know anything about the education I'm getting when you don't even know what school I go to or anything about anyone working there. This is preposterous and it is absurd of you to attempt to tell me about anything regards my situation. You know nothing about any of it and I can't understand why you persist in think that you do. Why don't you go and read why I posted in my last few responses again, because you've clearly missed the point. Try actually answering the questions I pose and the issues I raise. Until you do I am done responding to you and your idiotic assumptions.
The publishing houses are based in Texas
Texas has some seriously screwed rules about what is acceptable.
If you cant get the book published,you cant read it
It makes for a pretty safe assumption
The victors control the history,and unfortunatly America is very often the victor,we have bigger bombs.
We've skewed the entire history of the western hemisphere
We didnt invade Grenada to make Ronnie look tough after he cut and ran from Lebanon.
We did it because there were 30 cubans with power tools looking to bring down western civilization by building an airport
We didnt invade Panama to cover up a drug deal gone bad in the Iran Contra scandal
We did it to protect the western hemisphere from the dictator who two years earlier we praised for him helping us fight drugs
None of those "skewed histories" have been presented as facts to me, so you're wrong yet again. Why do you persist in making assumptions about my education? Have you ever been to a Canadian University, let alone the one I attend? Do you even know its name? They do not rely on standards set by the State of Texas. Not a single one of my texts were published there, I just looked at 6 of them. One was from NJ, one from NY, and one from Mass.;the others weren't even published in the States. You don't know jack shit about anything pertaining to my situation.
And the texts themselves are supplimental and selectively used to either support or contrast the teachings of the prof. What's contained in them is not necessarily indicative of what is being taught. Several of my professors frequently present different views of what is reported in certain parts of the texts anyways and several perspectives are almost always presented.
And please continue to tell me more about the obvious right-wing, revisionist bias of my liberal professors. Since you know so much about them and their positions, perspectives, and ideologies, why don't you start my giving me their names?
And while we're at it, since you're clearly omnipotent, what did I have for dinner last night?
-
Re: Interested In Lyle's Opinion of Sarah Palin
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CFH
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Trainer Monkey
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CFH
How would you know who writes my text books? Yes, as I said, some of them are written by Americans. However, that isn't necessarily indicitive of their political bias. Using your ridiculous logic, I guess that means you're a right-wing revisionist as well because you're an American.
How could you possibly know anything about the education I'm getting when you don't even know what school I go to or anything about anyone working there. This is preposterous and it is absurd of you to attempt to tell me about anything regards my situation. You know nothing about any of it and I can't understand why you persist in think that you do. Why don't you go and read why I posted in my last few responses again, because you've clearly missed the point. Try actually answering the questions I pose and the issues I raise. Until you do I am done responding to you and your idiotic assumptions.
The publishing houses are based in Texas
Texas has some seriously screwed rules about what is acceptable.
If you cant get the book published,you cant read it
It makes for a pretty safe assumption
The victors control the history,and unfortunatly America is very often the victor,we have bigger bombs.
We've skewed the entire history of the western hemisphere
We didnt invade Grenada to make Ronnie look tough after he cut and ran from Lebanon.
We did it because there were 30 cubans with power tools looking to bring down western civilization by building an airport
We didnt invade Panama to cover up a drug deal gone bad in the Iran Contra scandal
We did it to protect the western hemisphere from the dictator who two years earlier we praised for him helping us fight drugs
None of those "skewed histories" have been presented as facts to me, so you're wrong yet again. Why do you persist in making assumptions about my education? Have you ever been to a Canadian University, let alone the one I attend? Do you even know its name? They do not rely on standards set by the State of Texas. Not a single one of my texts were published there, I just looked at 6 of them. One was from NJ, one from NY, and one from Mass.;the others weren't even published in the States. You don't know jack shit about anything pertaining to my situation.
And the texts themselves are supplimental and selectively used to either support or contrast the teachings of the prof. What's contained in them is not necessarily indicative of what is being taught. Several of my professors frequently present different views of what is reported in certain parts of the texts anyways and several perspectives are almost always presented.
And please continue to tell me more about the obvious right-wing, revisionist bias of my liberal professors. Since you know so much about them and their positions, perspectives, and ideologies, why don't you start my giving me their names?
And while we're at it, since you're clearly omnipotent, what did I have for dinner last night?
Why dont you give me their names so I can research their specific postion papers?
-
Re: Interested In Lyle's Opinion of Sarah Palin
And if one of your Prof's is Paul Krause,I honestly cant call him one way or the other.He isnt liberal or conservative,he just randomly gets interested in things
-
Re: Interested In Lyle's Opinion of Sarah Palin
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Trainer Monkey
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CFH
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Trainer Monkey
The publishing houses are based in Texas
Texas has some seriously screwed rules about what is acceptable.
If you cant get the book published,you cant read it
It makes for a pretty safe assumption
The victors control the history,and unfortunatly America is very often the victor,we have bigger bombs.
We've skewed the entire history of the western hemisphere
We didnt invade Grenada to make Ronnie look tough after he cut and ran from Lebanon.
We did it because there were 30 cubans with power tools looking to bring down western civilization by building an airport
We didnt invade Panama to cover up a drug deal gone bad in the Iran Contra scandal
We did it to protect the western hemisphere from the dictator who two years earlier we praised for him helping us fight drugs
None of those "skewed histories" have been presented as facts to me, so you're wrong yet again. Why do you persist in making assumptions about my education? Have you ever been to a Canadian University, let alone the one I attend? Do you even know its name? They do not rely on standards set by the State of Texas. Not a single one of my texts were published there, I just looked at 6 of them. One was from NJ, one from NY, and one from Mass.;the others weren't even published in the States. You don't know jack shit about anything pertaining to my situation.
And the texts themselves are supplimental and selectively used to either support or contrast the teachings of the prof. What's contained in them is not necessarily indicative of what is being taught. Several of my professors frequently present different views of what is reported in certain parts of the texts anyways and several perspectives are almost always presented.
And please continue to tell me more about the obvious right-wing, revisionist bias of my liberal professors. Since you know so much about them and their positions, perspectives, and ideologies, why don't you start my giving me their names?
And while we're at it, since you're clearly omnipotent, what did I have for dinner last night?
Why dont you give me their names so I can research their specific postion papers?
But you've already told me all about them and their perspectives, why would you actually need to read something they had written when you already know all that??? Very confusing.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Trainer Monkey
And if one of your Prof's is Paul Krause,I honestly cant call him one way or the other.He isnt liberal or conservative,he just randomly gets interested in things
Wrong school.
-
Re: Interested In Lyle's Opinion of Sarah Palin
OK sorry I have to interject. This is fairly bizarre TM, what are you on about? Why are you mentioning right wing conservative commentators? Did Sean Hannity write textbooks or something? This is ridiculous, you're telling him that he is being tought rewritten history, yet you have no idea what he is actually being taught. I have an English teacher that was in the Weather Underground, of course she must be teaching the agendas of the rich and right winged. Seriously, get a grip.
-
Re: Interested In Lyle's Opinion of Sarah Palin
Quote:
Originally Posted by
amat
OK sorry I have to interject. This is fairly bizarre TM, what are you on about? Why are you mentioning right wing conservative commentators? Did Sean Hannity write textbooks or something? This is ridiculous, you're telling him that he is being tought rewritten history, yet you have no idea what he is actually being taught. I have an English teacher that was in the Weather Underground, of course she must be teaching the agendas of the rich and right winged. Seriously, get a grip.
Get a grip youself
History gets re-written all the time
Was Thodosius Alaric a blood thirst savage,or he was a leader of his people who spared Rome being sacked for a place in Pax Romana?
Depends on what text you read
Whas Frederick Douglas a pro-union Zealot,or a pro Slavery one
Depends on your text
James Buchanan,gutless queer,or President trying to walk a tightrope
Depends on your text
Mother Jones,tireless union organizer, or domestic terrorist
Depends on the text your reading
McCarthey drunken letch living the limelight,or tireless anti-communist crusader
Depends on wether or not your a big enough moron to read an Ann Coulter book
-
Re: Interested In Lyle's Opinion of Sarah Palin
OK even if all that is true, you have no idea what anyone else is being taught so what you're saying really doesn't matter. That's the point. I don't have to type anymore because CFH has already put it perfectly you just chose to ramble on on stuff that dodges the point.
-
Re: Interested In Lyle's Opinion of Sarah Palin
Quote:
Originally Posted by
amat
OK even if all that is true, you have no idea what anyone else is being taught so what you're saying really doesn't matter. That's the point. I don't have to type anymore because CFH has already put it perfectly you just chose to ramble on on stuff that dodges the point.
No,what CFH is attempting to do is the equivalent of me looking at a dustbowl survivor and saying
"Well my history teacher says it wasnt that dry"
-
Re: Interested In Lyle's Opinion of Sarah Palin
No, no he's not. He hasn't corrected you on one actual thing you have said from what I read. He just said you have no idea who his teachers are therefore you can't comment on what he's being taught. And he's right.
-
Re: Interested In Lyle's Opinion of Sarah Palin
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Trainer Monkey
Quote:
Originally Posted by
amat
OK even if all that is true, you have no idea what anyone else is being taught so what you're saying really doesn't matter. That's the point. I don't have to type anymore because CFH has already put it perfectly you just chose to ramble on on stuff that dodges the point.
No,what CFH is attempting to do is the equivalent of me looking at a dustbowl survivor and saying
"Well my history teacher says it wasnt that dry"
This is the last time I'm responding to your lunacy. Whatever modicum of respect I once had for you as a poster is gone. Am I speaking fucking Klingon here?
Maybe if I capitalize what I am typing you will understand it better. YOU DO NOT KNOW MY PROFESSORS, YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHAT THEY TEACH AND WHAT THEIR POSITIONS ARE. YOU CANNOT NAME ONE OF THEM, NOR DO YOU KNOW WHAT SCHOOL I ATTEND. I HAVE REBUTTED EVERY SINGLE POINT YOU HAVE MADE IN REGARDS TO THEM, YET YOU CONTINUE STUMBLING FROM ONE FAULTY POSITION TO THE NEXT. YOU ASSUME THAT EVERYTHING EXISTS THE WAY YOU IMAGINE IT TO BECAUSE YOU ARE CLEARLY DELUSIONAL OR PERHAPS YOU ARE SIMPLY FUNCTIONALLY RETARDED, I DO NOT KNOW. I DO NOT CARE. I KNOW IT IS HARD FOR PEOPLE LIKE YOU TO UNDERSTAND THAT THERE IS A WORLD OUTSIDE OF THE BORDERS OF YOUR COUNTRY. I LIVE IN CANADA (pronounced Can-ah-duh, it's a lovely place, but I digress) IT IS NOT PART OF AMERICA (believe it or not), AND WHATEVER CONSPIRACY YOU PERCEIVE TO BE TAKING PLACE IN THE U.S. IS NOT OCCURRING HERE. MY BOOKS DO NOT COME FROM TEXAS, MY TEACHERS ARE NOT PART OF A MASSIVE CONSPIRACY, THEY DO NOT CONCERN THEMSELVES WITH ANYTHING OTHER THAN THE FACTS.
I ASK YOU AGAIN, SINCE YOU CLAIM KNOW SO MUCH ABOUT MY PROFESSORS, WHAT ARE THEIR NAMES? WHAT HAVE THEY WRITTEN WHICH JUSTIFIES YOUR WILD ASSERTIONS? JUSTIFY ANYTHING YOU HAVE SAID AS IT RELATES TO ME.
YOU HAVE NOT ADDRESSED ANY OF THE FLAWS I HAVE RAISED IN YOUR RIDICULOUS ASSERTIONS, NOR HAVE YOU ANSWERED ANY OF MY QUESTIONS. SURPRISE SURPRISE.
When you are ready to rebut ANY of my assertions, which you are clearly unable to do, feel free to reply.
-
Re: Interested In Lyle's Opinion of Sarah Palin
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CFH
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Trainer Monkey
Quote:
Originally Posted by
amat
OK even if all that is true, you have no idea what anyone else is being taught so what you're saying really doesn't matter. That's the point. I don't have to type anymore because CFH has already put it perfectly you just chose to ramble on on stuff that dodges the point.
No,what CFH is attempting to do is the equivalent of me looking at a dustbowl survivor and saying
"Well my history teacher says it wasnt that dry"
This is the last time I'm responding to your lunacy. Whatever modicum of respect I once had for you as a poster is gone. Am I speaking fucking Klingon here?
Maybe if I capitalize what I am typing you will understand it better. YOU DO NOT KNOW MY PROFESSORS, YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHAT THEY TEACH AND WHAT THEIR POSITIONS ARE. YOU CANNOT NAME ONE OF THEM, NOR DO YOU KNOW WHAT SCHOOL I ATTEND. I HAVE REBUTTED EVERY SINGLE POINT YOU HAVE MADE IN REGARDS TO THEM, YET YOU CONTINUE STUMBLING FROM ONE FAULTY POSITION TO THE NEXT. YOU ASSUME THAT EVERYTHING EXISTS THE WAY YOU IMAGINE IT TO BECAUSE YOU ARE CLEARLY DELUSIONAL OR PERHAPS YOU ARE SIMPLY FUNCTIONALLY RETARDED, I DO NOT KNOW. I DO NOT CARE. I KNOW IT IS HARD FOR PEOPLE LIKE YOU TO UNDERSTAND THAT THERE IS A WORLD OUTSIDE OF THE BORDERS OF YOUR COUNTRY. I LIVE IN CANADA (pronounced Can-ah-duh, it's a lovely place, but I digress) IT IS NOT PART OF AMERICA (believe it or not), AND WHATEVER CONSPIRACY YOU
PERCEIVE TO BE TAKING PLACE IN THE U.S. IS NOT OCCURRING HERE. MY BOOKS DO NOT COME FROM TEXAS, MY TEACHERS ARE NOT PART OF A MASSIVE CONSPIRACY, THEY DO NOT CONCERN THEMSELVES WITH ANYTHING OTHER THAN THE FACTS.
I ASK YOU AGAIN, SINCE YOU CLAIM KNOW SO MUCH ABOUT MY PROFESSORS, WHAT ARE THEIR NAMES? WHAT HAVE THEY WRITTEN WHICH JUSTIFIES YOUR WILD ASSERTIONS?
JUSTIFY ANYTHING YOU HAVE SAID AS IT RELATES TO ME.
YOU HAVE NOT ADDRESSED ANY OF THE FLAWS I HAVE RAISED IN YOUR RIDICULOUS ASSERTIONS, NOR HAVE YOU ANSWERED ANY OF MY QUESTIONS. SURPRISE SURPRISE.
When you are ready to rebut ANY of my assertions, which you are clearly unable to do, feel free to reply.
I asked you to name your professors,did I not? So I could research their position papers on my own
Did I not,oh wait,I do believe I did ask for said information,which you refused to provide
What is your problem?
-
Re: Interested In Lyle's Opinion of Sarah Palin
And since your so concerned with my problem,being told that my opinions on the politics of my own country in a time frame you werent alive for are invalid,is more then a little insulting
-
Re: Interested In Lyle's Opinion of Sarah Palin
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Trainer Monkey
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CFH
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Trainer Monkey
No,what CFH is attempting to do is the equivalent of me looking at a dustbowl survivor and saying
"Well my history teacher says it wasnt that dry"
This is the last time I'm responding to your lunacy. Whatever modicum of respect I once had for you as a poster is gone. Am I speaking fucking Klingon here?
Maybe if I capitalize what I am typing you will understand it better. YOU DO NOT KNOW MY PROFESSORS, YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHAT THEY TEACH AND WHAT THEIR POSITIONS ARE. YOU CANNOT NAME ONE OF THEM, NOR DO YOU KNOW WHAT SCHOOL I ATTEND. I HAVE REBUTTED EVERY SINGLE POINT YOU HAVE MADE IN REGARDS TO THEM, YET YOU CONTINUE STUMBLING FROM ONE FAULTY POSITION TO THE NEXT. YOU ASSUME THAT EVERYTHING EXISTS THE WAY YOU IMAGINE IT TO BECAUSE YOU ARE CLEARLY DELUSIONAL OR PERHAPS YOU ARE SIMPLY FUNCTIONALLY RETARDED, I DO NOT KNOW. I DO NOT CARE. I KNOW IT IS HARD FOR PEOPLE LIKE YOU TO UNDERSTAND THAT THERE IS A WORLD OUTSIDE OF THE BORDERS OF YOUR COUNTRY. I LIVE IN CANADA (pronounced Can-ah-duh, it's a lovely place, but I digress) IT IS NOT PART OF AMERICA (believe it or not), AND WHATEVER CONSPIRACY YOU
PERCEIVE TO BE TAKING PLACE IN THE U.S. IS NOT OCCURRING HERE. MY BOOKS DO NOT COME FROM TEXAS, MY TEACHERS ARE NOT PART OF A MASSIVE CONSPIRACY, THEY DO NOT CONCERN THEMSELVES WITH ANYTHING OTHER THAN THE FACTS.
I ASK YOU AGAIN, SINCE YOU CLAIM KNOW SO MUCH ABOUT MY PROFESSORS, WHAT ARE THEIR NAMES? WHAT HAVE THEY WRITTEN WHICH JUSTIFIES YOUR WILD ASSERTIONS?
JUSTIFY ANYTHING YOU HAVE SAID AS IT RELATES TO ME.
YOU HAVE NOT ADDRESSED ANY OF THE FLAWS I HAVE RAISED IN YOUR RIDICULOUS ASSERTIONS, NOR HAVE YOU ANSWERED ANY OF MY QUESTIONS. SURPRISE SURPRISE.
When you are ready to rebut ANY of my assertions, which you are clearly unable to do, feel free to reply.
I asked you to name your professors,did I not? So I could research their position papers on my own
Did I not,oh wait,I do believe I did ask for said information,which you refused to provide
What is your problem?
lol, you're the one who claims to already know their positions, shouldn't you have their names? I would be shocked if you would make those kind of statements without doing your research first.
Or could it be that you are just some know it all asshole? Nah, I'm sure you know their names.
-
Re: Interested In Lyle's Opinion of Sarah Palin
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Trainer Monkey
And since your so concerned with my problem,being told that my opinions on the politics of my own country in a time frame you werent alive for are invalid,is more then a little insulting
When did I say they were invalid? All I did was say that Carter's failure to be re-elected was due to more than the hostage crises. You subsequently lost your mind, but that is not my problem.
PS. History is all about talking about time frames most historians weren't alive for.
Edit: For the record, I consider them to be invalid now, because you've demonstrated that you are an idiot, but prior to this I considered them quite valid.
-
Re: Interested In Lyle's Opinion of Sarah Palin
To put it in to full perspective,it would be like somebody 20 years my juniour telling me that Cobb really had a chance against Holmes.
I watched the fight live for gods sake
And then when I pointed that out,them saying,"Well I read somewhere he was really in that fight"
-
Re: Interested In Lyle's Opinion of Sarah Palin
C'mon, try and guess their names again. You got the Province right last time, it shouldn't be too hard.
-
Re: Interested In Lyle's Opinion of Sarah Palin
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Trainer Monkey
To put it in to full perspective,it would be like somebody 20 years my juniour telling me that Cobb really had a chance against Holmes.
I watched the fight live for gods sake
And then when I pointed that out,them saying,"Well I read somewhere he was really in that fight"
LOL, I'm starting to feel sorry for you. Just because you lived through something, doesn't mean you understand it. And I never once said you didn't understand it.
-
Re: Interested In Lyle's Opinion of Sarah Palin
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CFH
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Trainer Monkey
And since your so concerned with my problem,being told that my opinions on the politics of my own country in a time frame you werent alive for are invalid,is more then a little insulting
When did I say they were invalid? All I did was say that Carter's failure to be re-elected was due to more than the hostage crises. You subsequently lost your mind, but that is not my problem.
PS. History is all about talking about time frames most historians weren't alive for.
Edit: For the record, I consider them to be invalid now, because you've demonstrated that you are an idiot, but prior to this I considered them quite valid.
There is also an oral history and a written history,to ignore either is to ignore the full panorama
And facts are facts,the economy didnt get signifigantly worse under Carter,nor did it get any better. Actually if you count getting OPEC off our ass,it did improve
But the only story you could find on the news that election year,was the hostages
-
Re: Interested In Lyle's Opinion of Sarah Palin
If you lived through it...and the only news you saw were stories on the hostages, aren't you defeating your own point? ;D
Really, this reminds me a Starr type argument.
"I know more, here let me try to divert the subject, ok were off subject now lets go back to the original subject"
Ridiculous.
-
Re: Interested In Lyle's Opinion of Sarah Palin
And please lets examine the thought of
"Lost all respective for you as a poster"
"What is your problem"
"You lost your mind"
Who indeed,has lost their mind?
Did I fight fire with fire,or did you allow your emotions to get the better of your rational thought?
-
Re: Interested In Lyle's Opinion of Sarah Palin
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Trainer Monkey
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CFH
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Trainer Monkey
And since your so concerned with my problem,being told that my opinions on the politics of my own country in a time frame you werent alive for are invalid,is more then a little insulting
When did I say they were invalid? All I did was say that Carter's failure to be re-elected was due to more than the hostage crises. You subsequently lost your mind, but that is not my problem.
PS. History is all about talking about time frames most historians weren't alive for.
Edit: For the record, I consider them to be invalid now, because you've demonstrated that you are an idiot, but prior to this I considered them quite valid.
There is also an oral history and a written history,to ignore either is to ignore the full panorama
And facts are facts,the economy didnt get signifigantly worse under Carter,nor did it get any better. Actually if you count getting OPEC off our ass,it did improve
But the only story you could find on the news that election year,was the hostages
You're the one ignoring "the full panorama" by claiming that it was due to one thing only, but that doesn't really matter because I mostly agree with you on it, as I previously stated.
Now back up some of the ridiculous bullshit you've spewed. C'mon fuckwit, do it.
What about the text books, what about my profs? UBC was a good guess, but really, since I have the BC flag under my name it's not that impressive. Hell, I've mentioned my school on here many times.
-
Re: Interested In Lyle's Opinion of Sarah Palin
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Trainer Monkey
And please lets examine the thought of
"Lost all respective for you as a poster"
"What is your problem"
"You lost your mind"
Who indeed,has lost their mind?
Did I fight fire with fire,or did you allow your emotions to get the better of your rational thought?
Ummm, you?
The only emotions I'm experiencing are humor and a bit of pity.
-
Re: Interested In Lyle's Opinion of Sarah Palin
Quote:
Originally Posted by
amat
If you lived through it...and the only news you saw were stories on the hostages, aren't you defeating your own point? ;D
Really, this reminds me a Starr type argument.
"I know more, here let me try to divert the subject, ok were off subject now lets go back to the original subject"
Ridiculous.
And what forms voter opinions?
Steady and conscientious research,or volatile news reports?
If you really believe the former,someone inform Fox News they are wasting their time.
And I look forward to a day where I cease getting NewsMax bulletins in my inbox,and MoveOn ones for all that matter
-
Re: Interested In Lyle's Opinion of Sarah Palin
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Trainer Monkey
And please lets examine the thought of
"Lost all respective for you as a poster"
"What is your problem"
"You lost your mind"
Who indeed,has lost their mind?
Did I fight fire with fire,or did you allow your emotions to get the better of your rational thought?
When you tell people what they know or what they are being taught is wrong then yeah, they are going to think you are insane. Especially when you don't actually know what it is they are being taught. And you're the one going off on tangents about Ann Coulter and Sean Hannity.
Sorry but I think you should exit the thread it really does nothing to make you look good. Maybe it does, but you're dodging questions more then Sarah Palin right now. I'm not trying to gang up on anyone it's just pretty mindnumbing reading your posts so I thought I would comment.
-
Re: Interested In Lyle's Opinion of Sarah Palin
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CFH
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Trainer Monkey
And please lets examine the thought of
"Lost all respective for you as a poster"
"What is your problem"
"You lost your mind"
Who indeed,has lost their mind?
Did I fight fire with fire,or did you allow your emotions to get the better of your rational thought?
Ummm, you?
The only emotions I'm experiencing are humor and a bit of pity.
Now you resort to the nice cheap internet ploy of the faux pity
I have yet to call you an impudent little shit who couldnt find his ass with both hands and a map without his Professors say so.
OK I just did,but you get my drift
-
Re: Interested In Lyle's Opinion of Sarah Palin
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Trainer Monkey
Quote:
Originally Posted by
amat
If you lived through it...and the only news you saw were stories on the hostages, aren't you defeating your own point? ;D
Really, this reminds me a Starr type argument.
"I know more, here let me try to divert the subject, ok were off subject now lets go back to the original subject"
Ridiculous.
And what forms voter opinions?
Steady and conscientious research,or volatile news reports?
If you really believe the former,someone inform Fox News they are wasting their time.
And I look forward to a day where I cease getting NewsMax bulletins in my inbox,and MoveOn ones for all that matter
Where does voting come in. You're telling him not to comment on stuff you lived through and acted like that automatically made you right. My mom lived through Leonard-Hearns I, I didn't. Does that mean she knows more about the subject then me?
-
Re: Interested In Lyle's Opinion of Sarah Palin
-
Re: Interested In Lyle's Opinion of Sarah Palin
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Trainer Monkey
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CFH
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Trainer Monkey
And please lets examine the thought of
"Lost all respective for you as a poster"
"What is your problem"
"You lost your mind"
Who indeed,has lost their mind?
Did I fight fire with fire,or did you allow your emotions to get the better of your rational thought?
Ummm, you?
The only emotions I'm experiencing are humor and a bit of pity.
Now you resort to the nice cheap internet ploy of the faux pity
I have yet to call you an impudent little shit who couldnt find his ass with both hands and a map without his Professors say so.
OK I just did,but you get my drift
:rotflmao:
Jealousy will get you nowhere.
-
Re: Interested In Lyle's Opinion of Sarah Palin
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CFH
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Trainer Monkey
To put it in to full perspective,it would be like somebody 20 years my juniour telling me that Cobb really had a chance against Holmes.
I watched the fight live for gods sake
And then when I pointed that out,them saying,"Well I read somewhere he was really in that fight"
LOL, I'm starting to feel sorry for you. Just because you lived through something, doesn't mean you understand it. And I never once said you didn't understand it.
And because you didnt,increases the odds that you or sure dont
Hey a tidal wave hit a week ago,what was it like
Well,I wasnt there,but reliable sources inform me moisture might have been involved
-
Re: Interested In Lyle's Opinion of Sarah Palin
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Trainer Monkey
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CFH
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Trainer Monkey
To put it in to full perspective,it would be like somebody 20 years my juniour telling me that Cobb really had a chance against Holmes.
I watched the fight live for gods sake
And then when I pointed that out,them saying,"Well I read somewhere he was really in that fight"
LOL, I'm starting to feel sorry for you. Just because you lived through something, doesn't mean you understand it. And I never once said you didn't understand it.
And because you didnt,increases the odds that you or sure dont
Hey a tidal wave hit a week ago,what was it like
Well,I wasnt there,but reliable sources inform me moisture might have been involved
LOL
This is epic.
