how else would he lose? there's only one person who will outbox him and thats shane who very well could stop him too. other than shane...cotto, margarito, clottey, berto, all get pummeled my pbf. paul williams does too. who shane would stop too.
Printable View
FUck off Seanie... Collazo was doing fine against Mosley before he broke his and didn't throw punches with any conviction for the rest of the fight. Mosley certainly isnt' that much better than Hatton, and look how much better he did than Hatton against Collazo as well. I know how good MOsley, I've seen almost his entire career.
Who on here said Mosley was going to win this fight, let alone by KO? Half you people don't state what you think, and talk shit after the fact.
Ok where did you state Mosley would win or even win in dominating fashion? If anything if you look back when I used to think most of the top WW would beat Margarito, his performance against Cotto gave me real reason to believe that MArgarito would catch and hit Mosley time after time. Wow I didn't anticipate Pacquiao-De La Hoya or Mosley-mArgarito in both cases I said it would be a tough fight, and I posted this thread a round into the fight. After the first round I knew Mosley would win it just by how he was being so physical and not letting Margarito get off at all. How did I take credit for this fight? You make absolutely no sense, I take personal enjoyment that we can actually watch quality WW fight eachother instead of Margarito, but I don't take any credit for MOsley winning, he fought the perfect fight he would with his style.
I wasn't the one hailing Pacquiao-De La Hoya, Mosley-Margarito, Hopkins-Pavlik as the mismatches of the century, sure I thought Margarito was being a pussy because legitimately Williams deserved this fight.
Shane wont outbox Mayweather maybe out fight him like he did Tony and Floyd is no Tony. Look at the fighters who beat shane Winky, Cotto, Vernon. All 3 have good boxing skills and a good jab thats how u beat shane and Floyd is a better boxer than those 3 IMO.
I wasn't trying to stir anythign up here. Mayweather would beat Margarito because its clear Margarito can't deal with speed or clinching or movement. Mayweather would counter punch him for 12 rounds, and everytime Margarito would get in close Mayweather would tie him up if he had to, or block every punch and counter back some more.
I like how I get criticized for liking people like Mayweather and Berto because they have TECHNICAL skills and athletic ability, yet people have no problems wtih Bilbo humping Calzaghe's leg, or half the peopel with spanish decent humping the leg of JMM or Margarito.
Its only the people who like guys like Pacquiao, Mayweather, RJJ, Berto, De La Hoya, etc. that get any discredit for it.
Also if I liked everybody with speed why don't I hump Mosley's leg, or Meldrick Taylor's, or Hearn's, or Calzaghe's, Or Terry Norris's, or Naseem Hamed's, Or Zab Judah's, or Joan Guzman's, or Hector Camacho's, or Benitez's, or Michael Nunn's, or Junior Witter's?
The point is there are a ton of fast athletic guys I only really admire Gamboa, Rigondeaux, Ali, Leonard, Mayweather, RJJ, Pacquiao, and Andre Berto of the truly athletic elite, obviously there is something different I see in these guys than I do in the others and it isn't speed, I mean look how fast Mosley, MT, Calzaghe, Michael Nunn all are... Why don't I like them as well? Benitez, Mosley, Hearns and Calzaghe have had tremendously successful careers.
Also why do I like Cotto, Whitaker, Hopkins, Hatton, Toney, JMM, Barrera etc. so much? The fact is I like really good fighers, who are dominant in fights.
Look Teath i thought Mosley could win but i never expected be so one sided and i did not think he knock him out and as for Collazo i think he could of beat him regardless and he is past his peak so i would say he far better then say a Hatton who in prime was fighting life and death and Berto as well and Mosley is past his peak and he does just as good if not better i think you underrate Mosley alot i never really seen you have anything good to say about him and i dont understand why all Mosley loses i can see even Mayweather having trouble with Forrest and i dont seeing him beating a Winkey and i not sure how good he would be if he was in his late 30s since he quite right at 30 Mosley has fought and beat top contenders and form Oscar to Margrito and between those guys good fighters he never ducked anyone and even at his age beack in pound for pound so tell me what is it that you dont like about him just to ask you.
winky? are you serious..winky had been at 154 his whole career shane came up from 135....vernon in the first fight caught shane with a right hand seconds after a head butt opened a cut atop shane's head which later was revealed to have caused a concussion. the second fight with vernon neither of them really were that impressive. and cotto v shane was no different than pbf v castillo I..where the young prospect got the decision even though he could have very well lost the fight.
shane has been in the sport as long as floyd..both had 200 amateur fights...shane can outbox floyd...winky and cotto where able to win because shane had forgotten to include the jab in his arsenal. now that its back. He'll give mayweather more than he can handle. ive been saying this since floyd decided to move up past 135. I said he will hand pick the good but less threatening big guys....
CHOP,GATTI,MITCHELL,JUDAH,BALDOMIR,DELAHOYA,HATTON ....
all those fighters are good, but mosley beat a prime oscar twice (in the first fight much more decisively than pbf) and would kayo the rest of them
point is go to vegas sneak into mayweather training camp and listen to roger tell floyd that shane is too strong for him. This will be proven when floyd comes back and fights the winner of hatton v pacman. Then it will be obvious that he wants no part of shane, the same as ray leonard wanted no part of pryor.