Re: "Hatton's Last Fight with Malignaggi breakdown"
Quote:
Originally Posted by
fan johnny
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Spoon23
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ono
What would you say is a bigger hinderance....sore right hand or being severley weight-drained.
Collazo fractured his hand against Mosley yet people give Shane credit for it.
Paulie broke his right hand against Cotto yet everyone claims how good a beat down it was (it was quite a close fight on the cards).
So yeah, good post :rolleyes:
Dlh wasn't weight drained at all that fight he was just slim from eating kangaroo meat. He was floating
around 145lbs during his training as seen on 24/7. A weight drained fighter has to lose extra poundage on the day of the weigh-in. In his case he was not, even ricky mentioned in sentana sports Dlh looked fabulous in the weigh-in. looks hydrated pretty well during the weigh-in.
But if you ask me which is a bigger hindrance, depends really how much he has to lose on the day of the weigh-in. But fighting with 1 hand in boxing is like playing basketball or golf with one hand. You just can't play good. Hence, having a 1 handed fighter is like fighting a novice really. Paulie had no chance for Hatton on that night. He was just their for the money. Hatton should have stopped him even earlier really.
Paulie was cherry picked, as a confidence booster for hatton;D
Dude! you are embarrassing yourself...
Weight has a lot to do with body type & age. Ocsar was more 'natural' at 160/154 for his size a maturity. The advantage Pacquiao had going into the fight is that Oscar would have to be 'weight drained' to step into the ring at 147. At 35 years of age he needed the body fat to draw energy from. The intensity level and stress leading up to the fight looks like it wreaked havoc on Oscar. His nutritionist fuked up and left Oscar with no energy for the fight. He's what 2% body fat? 4% to 6% is a proper number for a guy in his prime.
"The kid was in great shape. So he wasn’t the winner that night. That is the way I put it. There are no excuses, nothing. The better fighter that night won, Manny Pacquiao." Angelo Dundee
Re: "Hatton's Last Fight with Malignaggi breakdown"
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Danny_G
Quote:
Originally Posted by
leftylee
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Danny_G
I guess you and I are the only ones. IMO, Malignaggi was never the same after he got beat up by a one handed Cotto. I guess this is why I did not make such a big deal about Hatton beating Malignaggi. In short, Malignaggi was exposed, has soft hands and what else can you say about the kid?
I did not think much of the Lazcano fight either.
Styles make fights ;D
I am still picking PacMan to win. It might not be that one sided fight I am hoping it will be but none the less, I will pick the under dog ;D Right? PacMan is the underdog here, yes?
Maybe Pac could do a Margarito against Cotto.
An underdog, yet knocked Cotto the FUCKK out!!! :lolhaha:
Though I seriousley doubt Hatton getting beat like Michelle Cotta did, who basically just quit like a true biatch.
Tony needed
PLASTER to beat Cotto.
Manny will not need any plaster to beat the pink off of Hatton. Hatton will be forced to quit on his stool or get knocked the phuk out by a midget.
;)
I agree =)