-
Re: Ricky Hatton, "Manny Pacquiao is not versatile".
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Killa From Manila
Quote:
Originally Posted by
THE BOXING GOD
And miles, sharmba mitchell was 34 years old in that fight and at the end of his prime,2 past there prime fighters fighting each other proves nothing,while there 1st fight mitchell gave tszyu hell with a bum knee,and I have said on every thread n here I don't place much on the delahoya fight he was shot,he showed good footwork and combos,I place the greatness I put on pac from his fights with greats like marquez barerra and morales,destroying a ledwaba who every1 thought was a awesome champ,destroying a jorge julio a former champ who had NEVER been knocked out be4 in the 2nd round,being the ONLY fighter to ever knock out the great erik morales,oh yeah he did it twice,beating and undefeated challenger in solis,this is why I know he will beat hatton I'm not underestimating ricky,he just is easy money for pac man
Lol! Pacman is going to take Hatton's lunch money and there is a lot of it to take because Hatton name does make money with his immense following.
However, that should not be confused with him actually being an elite fighter - Because he is not. He has never been more than a B-level fighter and now he is a shot fighter going against a guy in his prime. Hatton will take a worse beating than Oscar did from Pacman.
He likes to clinch and rest a bit before boxing again. Fight like a man Ricky damn it. What happens when he faces someone that doesn't need any rest for the starting bell of round 1 to the end of round 12. Hatton a very nice guy, a very good boxer (but not great); unfortunately facing a whirlwind/torando with MP.
I guess that makes Pac a pussy. Why does he keep picking on B-level and "shot" fighters? Maybe that lucky decision against Marquez scared him off. I think yes, no?
-
Re: Ricky Hatton, "Manny Pacquiao is not versatile".
Think you'll find that if Pacquiao wins that most of the people who want Hatton to win will be very gracious and realise that Ricky was beaten by a better boxer, cos' that's what boxing fans do. If it happens the other way round I'd hope the Manny fans would do the same ;)
-
Re: Ricky Hatton, "Manny Pacquiao is not versatile".
I wouldnt say Pacquiao chin is bad he has never been ko'ed by a head shot so you carnt say its a weak point.Just the fact that it is untested above 130 and he is in with a decent puncher at 140 which is gonna test it.
Hattons chin has'nt looked great in last few fights against Lazcano and he got stopped at 147 against the p4p champ so no shame in that.But i feel when Hatton is on his game and fully fit going into a fight he can take a punch alot better. He never had good build up for the Collazo and Lazcano fight and he got hurt but look at the fights he was fully fit against KT,Phillips,Urango,Ben Tackie and Castillo all big punchers and he took full shots of them and was ok.
-
Re: Ricky Hatton, "Manny Pacquiao is not versatile".
Quote:
Originally Posted by
THE BOXING GOD
He beat barerra and morales be4 they were shot,beat marquez,and drew with him(no shame n that,he's a p4p contender,last time hatton fought one of those he got ko'd)beat ledwaba when he was champ n his prime,not many people picked him 2 win that fight,beat undefeated solis,moved up a weight class and completley dominated and KO'd the belt holder diaz,when hatton moved up a weight class and fought a belt holder not only did he not ko or dominate he got a gift decision and ran back to the lower weight class,while manny moved up 2 more weight classes,u can't compare hatton and pacs resume',hattons just hasn't fought,and beat,as many good fighters as pac
Diaz he was the weakest champ at 135 and one expected him to cause any problems.
-
Re: Ricky Hatton, "Manny Pacquiao is not versatile".
Quote:
Originally Posted by
THE BOXING GOD
I don't remember the last time hatton ko'd a guy with one shot
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s45OX...om=PL&index=17
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_A-hmw4b18
-
Re: Ricky Hatton, "Manny Pacquiao is not versatile".
Quote:
Originally Posted by
THE BOXING GOD
Quote:
Originally Posted by
JT Rock
Quote:
Originally Posted by
THE BOXING GOD
,if pac loses this fight I will delete my account and never get on this website again
Yea that would clearly be a detrimental blow to this forum, seeing you been here a quick 2 minutes:rolleyes:
Yeah I been here 2 minutes and know more about this sport than you ever will son
Son? You THINK you know way more. I could care less really, but the narcissism, ego and vanity of one to think anyone would care that a 100 post/ 1 week Jonny would take his ball and go home if his boy lost is utterly ridiculous.
The pleasure of clearing that up was all mine
As you were
-
Re: Ricky Hatton, "Manny Pacquiao is not versatile".
Quote:
Originally Posted by
THE BOXING GOD
I said n awhile when was that 1st fight from? Hell when was tha castillo fight from??? Not that recent and castillo was washed up he didn't even put up a fight get that crap outta here!!!!! And my point on diaz was he steamrolled him,something hatton doesn't do to people,especially when he moves up a class,I'd say collozo was the weakest champ at welter at tha time
They took that fight on short notice i believe it wasnt a planned fight that Hatton would have 12weepks prep if it was planned.
-
Re: Ricky Hatton, "Manny Pacquiao is not versatile".
Quote:
I never once said anything about his win over diaz and I said more than once that oscar was shot,but he did what your supposed to do when u are better than your opponent
...yes, when you are better than your opponent who is just a punching bag that brings NOTHING to the ring. Let's use another example, maybe when he fought guys that TRIED at least. I'll give Pac more credit for beating Barrera than Diaz and ODLH which most Pac fans and Filipinos boast about.
Quote:
I hope all you can man up after pac beats ur man
I haven't heard anybody here say that they will leave the forum if Hatton looses.
"beat" Marquez
Quote:
and completley dominated and KO'd the belt holder diaz
The greatest ever Diaz, yep. Like I said before, I don't understand Pac fans who drool over Pac's victories vs Diaz and Punching Bag ODLH. There are other victories that I would be bragging about if I was a Pac fan really.
-
Re: Ricky Hatton, "Manny Pacquiao is not versatile".
Quote:
Originally Posted by
clintuk
Think you'll find that if Pacquiao wins that most of the people who want Hatton to win will be very gracious and realise that Ricky was beaten by a better boxer, cos' that's what boxing fans do. If it happens the other way round I'd hope the Manny fans would do the same ;)
To be honest, knowing this forum, this place will be a "sore winner fest" + "an excuse marathon" for the losing fighter. It's the big fight syndrome...
BTW, I can't believe someone just called JT ROCK "son."
-
Re: Ricky Hatton, "Manny Pacquiao is not versatile".
Quote:
The point I was making is that pac destroyed diaz,diaz isn't great no1 said that,but pac moves up a weight class and destroys him while washed up lazcano moves up to fight hatton and hatton looks like shit and doesn't destroy him when I'm sure pac would have dusted his ass,that's the point
Good comparison but to say that beating Diaz and ODLH are Pacs greatest accomplishment which I hear from Pac Fans and Filipinos, then that's a different story.
-
Re: Ricky Hatton, "Manny Pacquiao is not versatile".
Quote:
To be honest, knowing this forum, this place will be a "sore winner fest" + "an excuse marathon" for the losing fighter. It's the big fight syndrome...
Not sure if people were making excuses when Hatton lost vs Mayweather. The biggest excuse marathon I have seen so far in this forum is when Cotto lost but seeing all these devoted hardcore PacFans see him as God with boxing gloves with not a single flaw whatsoever then I can already see all these threads about why Pac lost (if he loses) by all these hardcore PacFans. Either that or this forum will not be seeing them anymore. At least one of them will be out of here as he already stated that if Pac loses he will leave the forum.
-
Re: Ricky Hatton, "Manny Pacquiao is not versatile".
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Chino
Quote:
To be honest, knowing this forum, this place will be a "sore winner fest" + "an excuse marathon" for the losing fighter. It's the big fight syndrome...
Not sure if people were making excuses when Hatton lost vs Mayweather. The biggest excuse marathon I have seen so far in this forum is when Cotto lost but seeing all these devoted hardcore PacFans see him as God with boxing gloves with not a single flaw whatsoever then I can already see all these threads about why Pac lost (if he loses) by all these hardcore PacFans. Either that or this forum will not be seeing them anymore. At least one of them will be out of here as he already stated that if Pac loses he will leave the forum.
There were definitely some over the fight with Mayweather.
-"Cortez stopped Hatton from fighting his fight"
-"Mayweather was allowed to fight dirty, not Ricky"
If Pacquiao somehow loses, I can only imagine the things that would come up.
-"Manny didn't get his haircut at the proper time"
-"Michael Moorer sabotaged Manny by aiding in his training"
-"Manny didn't have the right pair of socks"
I don't think the Pacfans would leave the forum, they would defend their man to the death!
-
Re: Ricky Hatton, "Manny Pacquiao is not versatile".
Quote:
Originally Posted by
C-Lo
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Chino
Quote:
To be honest, knowing this forum, this place will be a "sore winner fest" + "an excuse marathon" for the losing fighter. It's the big fight syndrome...
Not sure if people were making excuses when Hatton lost vs Mayweather. The biggest excuse marathon I have seen so far in this forum is when Cotto lost but seeing all these devoted hardcore PacFans see him as God with boxing gloves with not a single flaw whatsoever then I can already see all these threads about why Pac lost (if he loses) by all these hardcore PacFans. Either that or this forum will not be seeing them anymore. At least one of them will be out of here as he already stated that if Pac loses he will leave the forum.
There were definitely some over the fight with Mayweather.
-"Cortez stopped Hatton from fighting his fight"
-"Mayweather was allowed to fight dirty, not Ricky"
If Pacquiao somehow loses, I can only imagine the things that would come up.
-"Manny didn't get his haircut at the proper time"
-"Michael Moorer sabotaged Manny by aiding in his training"
-"Manny didn't have the right pair of socks"
I don't think the Pacfans would leave the forum, they would defend their man to the death!
LOL
-
Re: Ricky Hatton, "Manny Pacquiao is not versatile".
Quote:
Originally Posted by
miles
Quote:
Originally Posted by
THE BOXING GOD
Pac is one dimensional? he can be aggressive fight great coming forward,and showed n the oscar fight even if oscar was shot that he has great lateral movement,his punches come at beautiful different angles,all hatton knows how to do his hit and hold and hit,and that oscar that pac brutalized,he would have beat hatton,I wanna thank you guys for getting me so excited for this beat down I'm gonna enjoy it SOOOO much more now and ill be thinkin about u guys sitting there with ur heads down thinking of an excuse 2 make,if pac loses this fight I will delete my account and never get on this website again,that's how absolutely positively 110% sure that pac wins this fight u guys must have been watching hatton beat up bums 4 so long u can't recognize a great like pac when u see him
I disagree completely with the first part in bold. I think a lot of fighters could have beaten Oscar that night. He was weak and seemed to be fighting with weights in his gloves. He was beyond poor. But having said that, Pac looked nothing short of spectacular.
As for the second part in bold. Well, you can do that if you like but it's just a boxing contest. No need to be running away for possibly getting a pick wrong.
I was watching this fight recently and I forgot how Paq thought. Hedid a lot of bobbing and weaving making sure he did not get it. Aprt from flurrys he did not punch in great quanititys, wtahc the 8th.
I reckon Hatton would have knocked Oscar out by the 4th rd by applying far more pressure.
-
Re: Ricky Hatton, "Manny Pacquiao is not versatile".
Quote:
Originally Posted by
THE BOXING GOD
No miles I totally understand the aspect of size,I've been boxing for 13 years,I started out my 1st amatuer fight as a 90 pound 12 year old,and I've grown into a solid light heavy,I've fought for national championships with the like of andre dirrel lamont peterson timothy bradely mickey bey rayonta whittfield,I know boxing in and out,I agree hatton is the bigger man,just not that big! Just because he blows up between fights doesn't mean he's a huge jw,he doesn't steamroll guys he should,the main key to the fight is pac's boxing intelligence,and he's picked up a lot of moves fighting the likes of marquez barerra morales,hatton is not tricky,he's very simple,only time he's tricky is if the ref allows him 2 hold and I'm sure whoever it is won't let him n a fight of this magnitude,I don't see manny landing a flush left hook on manny all nite,and if he did I think manny would be able 2 take it,and I will be on this site 4 a long time calling it like it is because hatton is losing on may 2nd
just coz u been boxing 13 years my friend,it dont make u a better analyst than the next person, say someone who hasnt boxed before. and hatton may be simple,but hes effective,and i for one think ur overlooking him.
-
Re: Ricky Hatton, "Manny Pacquiao is not versatile".
[quote=C-Lo;719126]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
clintuk
BTW, I can't believe someone just called JT ROCK "son."
Me and you know this guy will be shit canned by fight night....
-
Re: Ricky Hatton, "Manny Pacquiao is not versatile".
Quote:
Originally Posted by
THE BOXING GOD
Yes I said son,I'm glad my ego is irritating to you that means I'm doing my job,I won't be going anywhere mate cuz pac destroyes the chump and I get to gloat on here everyday about it and it will be so sweet I will post a new thread everyday about a different aspect of the beating the bum received,he no longer gets called hatton just bum,the bum gets beat down may 2nd and there's nothing u and ur little "mates" cheering n the crowd will be able 2 do about it but cry and pout all tha way back to your pubs,as you were
Your not irritateing me man, your a dime of dozen dude seriously in 3 years I'v seen all kind around here... My mates? who are my mates? I am a moderate Hatton fan at best but when you make a ridiculous statement about leaving a forum that you would have been a member of less than a month come fight night and expect us to treat it like a drastic threat... I'm sorry man but its laughable
-
Re: Ricky Hatton, "Manny Pacquiao is not versatile".
Quote:
Originally Posted by
THE BOXING GOD
THE BOXING GOD is here to stay jtrock so get use to me, ill be telling it like it is and calling out overrated fighters like hatton and overrated analysts like yourself here for awhile buddy
overrated analysts????
You were called out, not the other way around... So tell me man when did you call me out? C'mon Mr.Big balls you make claims then lets start backing them
-
Re: Ricky Hatton, "Manny Pacquiao is not versatile".
Quote:
Originally Posted by
THE BOXING GOD
U didn't "call me out" u gave ur idiotic opinion I can't even remember all the dumb shit u said and frankly I'm tired of talking about this bum ricky hatton I can't believe I wasted this much time talking about the chump,someone start a new interesting thread about a real fighter please ricky hatton is not worth this much discussion and pac will prove it,ur outta ur league discussing this game with me son,outta ur league
such arrogance, hatton aint no chump,to become a world champion in the first place u cant be a chump,you should no being a so called boxer urself how hard it is to get up every morning to train ur ass off the decication that u need to even get to half the level htton is. i find ur choice of words very harsh.
-
Re: Ricky Hatton, "Manny Pacquiao is not versatile".
Quote:
Originally Posted by
THE BOXING GOD
U didn't "call me out" u gave ur idiotic opinion I can't even remember all the dumb shit u said and frankly I'm tired of talking about this bum ricky hatton I can't believe I wasted this much time talking about the chump,someone start a new interesting thread about a real fighter please ricky hatton is not worth this much discussion and pac will prove it,ur outta ur league discussing this game with me son,outta ur league
So lets get this straight....
You claimed I was an overated analyst
You claimed to call me out
When asked to support both of those claims, you tucked tail and sailed on out of their like a paper airplane. Which pretty much supports my argument that you my friend are a grade A bullshit artist;)
-
Re: Ricky Hatton, "Manny Pacquiao is not versatile".
To dismiss Hatton as a Chump and not give him credit for his obvious achievements is not only dumb but downright stircrazily retarded!!:rolleyes:
Manny is a quality fighter undoubtedly and will be a tough test for Ricky,but lets not pretend he is an unbeatable top draw fighter as we only need to look at his record to see that aint so!!
Ricky has made a number of valid points about Manny and him not being Versatile is top of the list!! He is a one track pony that will find it hard to Grind down Hatton and this fight can only end in a stoppage for Hatton after Manny tastes the sustained pressure and Power his opponent offers!
-
Re: Ricky Hatton, "Manny Pacquiao is not versatile".
4 words, handspeed, lateral movement, will, and lastly, lead lefts will wear down poor tricky Ricky by the 8th round. TKO because of a towel being thrown by Mayweather Senior. He'll throw in the towel when his son suffres the same fate as well from row # 3. Hatton may have heart, but he's in with a fighter on top of his game.
-
Re: Ricky Hatton, "Manny Pacquiao is not versatile".
You can cross Lateral movement off the list..the one thing Hatton does well is come in from different angles,confusing and pressurising his opponents...Manny won't get much opportunity in the fight to push on to Ricky because of it, so the Lateral movement on the offensive will be useless!
Hatton is given such little chance of winning it really surprises me..It just goes to show A win against an over the hill legend like Oscar really can catapult you to invincibility in some fans eyes;D
-
Re: Ricky Hatton, "Manny Pacquiao is not versatile".
Quote:
Originally Posted by
THE BOXING GOD
I've had to go to the level of calling ricky a chump because you hatton dickriders make him out to be a legend when he's a b level fighter,I said earlier I respected him that he was tough and had a lot of heart,but he has a padded record and he's gonna get beat down,again,by pac,its u delusional people who 4 sum odd reson think he's a great fighter that are the reason he catches so much shit,if u didn't make him out to be sum great fighter people would probably say hey ricky is a tough fighter I like him,he's mickey ward and you guys make him out to be a legend,he's mickey ward with great management and hype,there's your explanation u retards,he's a good fighter,he's about to fight anothere great fighter,and he's gonna get his ass beat,the boxing god has spoken and his word is final
You say you respect him but cal him a Chump...that Comment has more holes in it than your're argument;D
I think you will find varying opinions on the outcome of the fight on a number of forums and there is usually some asshole that has an over biggoted view that iritates people....I GUESS THATS WERE YOU CAME IN,JUDGING BY THE NEGATIVE RESPONSE YOU HAVE GENERATED;D
-
Re: Ricky Hatton, "Manny Pacquiao is not versatile".
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mofo2
You can cross Lateral movement off the list..the one thing Hatton does well is come in from different angles,confusing and pressurising his opponents...Manny won't get much opportunity in the fight to push on to Ricky because of it, so the Lateral movement on the offensive will be useless!
Hatton is given such little chance of winning it really surprises me..It just goes to show A win against an over the hill legend like Oscar really can catapult you to invincibility in some fans eyes;D
I don't about that. PBF pretty much lateraled his butt all night and got caught with a nasty check hook. :rolleyes:
-
Re: Ricky Hatton, "Manny Pacquiao is not versatile".
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Quinito
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mofo2
You can cross Lateral movement off the list..the one thing Hatton does well is come in from different angles,confusing and pressurising his opponents...Manny won't get much opportunity in the fight to push on to Ricky because of it, so the Lateral movement on the offensive will be useless!
Hatton is given such little chance of winning it really surprises me..It just goes to show A win against an over the hill legend like Oscar really can catapult you to invincibility in some fans eyes;D
I don't about that. PBF pretty much lateral
ed his butt all night and got caught with a nasty check hook. :rolleyes:
No PBF hit and held for almost the entire fight,rubbing his elbows into Hattons face on the break,Stooping down to force the referee to step in and seperate...and after a number of rounds caught him with a sweet hook...thats boxing! It aint no tickling contest;D But Manny aint as intelligent as Floyd!
-
Re: Ricky Hatton, "Manny Pacquiao is not versatile".
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mofo2
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Quinito
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mofo2
You can cross Lateral movement off the list..the one thing Hatton does well is come in from different angles,confusing and pressurising his opponents...Manny won't get much opportunity in the fight to push on to Ricky because of it, so the Lateral movement on the offensive will be useless!
Hatton is given such little chance of winning it really surprises me..It just goes to show A win against an over the hill legend like Oscar really can catapult you to invincibility in some fans eyes;D
I don't about that. PBF pretty much lateral
ed his butt all night and got caught with a nasty check hook. :rolleyes:
No PBF hit and held for almost the entire fight,rubbing his elbows into Hattons face on the break,Stooping down to force the referee to step in and seperate...and after a number of rounds caught him with a sweet hook...thats boxing! It aint no tickling contest;D But Manny aint as intelligent as Floyd!
Pac may not be as intelligent as PBF but he follows Roach's instruction very precise. That's why they're currently the greatest duo in the sport in the first place. Great teacher and great student.
-
Re: Ricky Hatton, "Manny Pacquiao is not versatile".
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Quinito
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mofo2
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Quinito
I don't about that. PBF pretty much lateraled his butt all night and got caught with a nasty check hook. :rolleyes:
No PBF hit and held for almost the entire fight,rubbing his elbows into Hattons face on the break,Stooping down to force the referee to step in and seperate...and after a number of rounds caught him with a sweet hook...thats boxing! It aint no tickling contest;D But Manny aint as intelligent as Floyd!
Pac may not be as intelligent as PBF but he follows Roach's instruction very precise. That's why they're currently the greatest duo in the sport in the first place. Great teacher and great student.
This fight will stir debate..I personally think Hatton and Mayweather Senior bring an equal amount to the table...Hatton has been refreshed in there short time together!!
-
Re: Ricky Hatton, "Manny Pacquiao is not versatile".
90 replies in less than 12 hours, wow :o
-
Re: Ricky Hatton, "Manny Pacquiao is not versatile".
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ross
Hmm, never realised until you just posted those up but those two fights are the only Hatton fights I have been to. Excellent news as I'll be be at this fight too, may the trend continue! ;D
As for BOXING GOD, how the f*** can you say that Hatton is a B level fighter? what a load of bollox! The man is the Ring Champ at 140, 4 time world champion and current top 10 P4P. :rolleyes:
Just because you box doesn't make your opinion fact!
I've said in other threads that this is a 50/50 fight. Too many unknowns going into the fight for anyone to be so damn sure of a win either way!
-
Re: Ricky Hatton, "Manny Pacquiao is not versatile".
Quote:
Originally Posted by
leftylee
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
We all know that PAC is more skilled and has more boxing styles than Hatton... If PAC is considered one-dimensional by Hatton then that makes Hatton a bum... ;)
.
You really need to think before you type :vd:
Ohh that's according to Hatton...;D If he consider the no. 1 P4P best boxer of the world "not versatile" and "1-dimensional" then that makes Hatton himself a "bum" and only "0.001-dimensional"... Hatton can't even crack the top 5 P4P list...;D
.
-
Re: Ricky Hatton, "Manny Pacquiao is not versatile".
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Conrad
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ross
I've said in other threads that this is a 50/50 fight. Too many unknowns going into the fight for anyone to be so damn sure of a win either way!
Pac-Hatton is TOTAL MISMATCH. Ricky won't win 1 single round and will get KOed in mid-rounds by a vicious liver shot. Mark my word.
-
Re: Ricky Hatton, "Manny Pacquiao is not versatile".
Said it before, when Manny stops punching and is under the slightest pressure he can't work on the back foot.If it continues he loses concentration and doesn't listen to instruction from the corner.
Seen a few times where he goes bob left,bob right...........repeat several times and then Oh yeah I need to punch as well , then he comes forward again. The minute he stops Hatton will be all over him like a cheap suit.
By the way does it count as necrophilia that Pac F****D a dead ODLH:-\
-
Re: Ricky Hatton, "Manny Pacquiao is not versatile".
Quote:
Originally Posted by
jamiebhoy
Said it before, when Manny stops punching and is under the slightest pressure he can't work on the back foot.If it continues he loses concentration and doesn't listen to instruction from the corner.
Seen a few times where he goes bob left,bob right...........repeat several times and then Oh yeah I need to punch as well , then he comes forward again. The minute he stops Hatton will be all over him like a cheap suit.
By the way does it count as necrophilia that Pac F****D a dead ODLH:-\
Could'nt agree more with your sentiments Jamie..The trouble with Manny is that he is so one dimensional that he can be read quite easily!! If he tries something new,he quickly reverts back to type and Ricky will hunt him down and pressureise him like an over the hill Oscar was never going to do! This is going to be a tough test for both fighters,but I can't see past Hatton either!
-
Re: Ricky Hatton, "Manny Pacquiao is not versatile".
There are a bunch of new people since I've been gone huh?
-
Re: Ricky Hatton, "Manny Pacquiao is not versatile".
Quote:
Originally Posted by
C-Lo
There are a bunch of new people since I've been gone huh?
Yep... Sometimes oldtimers also likes to create new handles when there's a big fight coming... (joke) ;)
Welcome back Buddy...
.
-
Re: Ricky Hatton, "Manny Pacquiao is not versatile".
Quote:
Originally Posted by
THE BOXING GOD
I've had to go to the level of calling ricky a chump because you hatton dickriders make him out to be a legend when he's a b level fighter,I said earlier I respected him that he was tough and had a lot of heart,but he has a padded record and he's gonna get beat down,again,by pac,its u delusional people who 4 sum odd reson think he's a great fighter that are the reason he catches so much shit,if u didn't make him out to be sum great fighter people would probably say hey ricky is a tough fighter I like him,he's mickey ward and you guys make him out to be a legend,he's mickey ward with great management and hype,there's your explanation u retards,he's a good fighter,he's about to fight anothere great fighter,and he's gonna get his ass beat,the boxing god has spoken and his word is final
i aint riding no dick, u a classes mother fukker the shit u talk, calling fighters chumps, whats happening with ur own career,u wish u could be a fraction of the level hatton is. ur a complete tool, the way u talk,WELL THE BOXING GOD HAS SPOKEN SO EVERY ONE MUST BOW DOWN AND EXCEPT WHAT I SAID IS TRUE, u know it all piece of shit, i aint got time for retards like u.
-
Re: Ricky Hatton, "Manny Pacquiao is not versatile".
Wow there are some comments on this, lead by the one and only GOD of boxing by the seems of it.
One of the most Pac-Over-Excited claims i've read up to now is from Killa In Manila, "Hatton will get a worse beating than DLH, Ha, you were smoking crack at the time of post there i can only assume"
-
Re: Ricky Hatton, "Manny Pacquiao is not versatile".
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Killa From Manila
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Conrad
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ross
I've said in other threads that this is a 50/50 fight. Too many unknowns going into the fight for anyone to be so damn sure of a win either way!
Pac-Hatton is TOTAL MISMATCH. Ricky won't win 1 single round and will get KOed in mid-rounds by a vicious liver shot. Mark my word.
;D;D;D
While i commend you for your commitment to the pac cause i cant help but wonder if your indeed tongue in cheek, on a windup or extremely stupid!! :o:o:o
-
Re: Ricky Hatton, "Manny Pacquiao is not versatile".
Quote:
Originally Posted by
hattonthehammer
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Killa From Manila
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Conrad
I've said in other threads that this is a 50/50 fight. Too many unknowns going into the fight for anyone to be so damn sure of a win either way!
Pac-Hatton is TOTAL MISMATCH. Ricky won't win 1 single round and will get KOed in mid-rounds by a vicious liver shot. Mark my word.
;D;D;D
While i commend you for your commitment to the pac cause i cant help but wonder if your indeed tongue in cheek, on a windup or extremely stupid!! :o:o:o
You'll find out whos extremely stupid after the fight.
