The POLL: Who should Cotto fight next?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hattonthehammer

Miguel Cotto-Ricky Hatton makes sense for so many reasons

before margarito/jennings/clottey i genuinely believed cotto was the 2nd best fighter in the world.

But if cheato can knock him out and a one dimensional less heavy handed joshua clottey can give him the nightmares he gave him i see no reason why hatton wouldnt be able to take him late on.

Both fighters would HAVE to win, for the loser it would be game over!!

Mayweather-Marquez
Pacquiao-Mosley
Cotto-Hatton

before the years out..............PLEASE ;D;D;D

---

Yes, please make that fight happen. I would love nothing better than to watch Hatton get knocked the fukk out one more time before he retires.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SigmaMu

I would like to see all of the above.
;D

---

All match-ups are good fight... But who you would like Cotto to maul first? ;)
.

i heard inside pac's camp that they're throwing away the idea for a catch weight in 143 as pac is aware of how he would look like in front of his fans. the fight would go on at 147, right on cotto's turf. this is true, iv'e confirmed this personally.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hattonthehammer

Miguel Cotto-Ricky Hatton makes sense for so many reasons

before margarito/jennings/clottey i genuinely believed cotto was the 2nd best fighter in the world.

But if cheato can knock him out and a one dimensional less heavy handed joshua clottey can give him the nightmares he gave him i see no reason why hatton wouldnt be able to take him late on.

Both fighters would HAVE to win, for the loser it would be game over!!

Mayweather-Marquez
Pacquiao-Mosley
Cotto-Hatton

before the years out..............PLEASE ;D;D;D

---

Pacquiao doesn't have the power of Cotto and he basically wobbled Hatton with every shot that landed, if Pacquiao KO'd Hatton in 2, Cotto would kill him in the 1st, and IMO seriously hurt Ricky seeing how the fight would be at 147

---

And where does that leave Mayweather in terms of punching power? hmmm;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by boozeboxer

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by XaduBoxer

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The_Infinite

Can't you add an option for Pacquiao at 147? I think there's at least 2 or 3 who posted here that they want a Pac-Cotto fight at 147.

I voted for a Clottey rematch. I really think Clottey will have learned from his mistakes from the first bout and not get too lazy/confident in a rematch. He has the tools to beat Cotto. Also, if Cotto wins convincingly in the rematch, it would erase some question marks from his last performance.

---

Sorry but I can't do it... I have no MOD powers... But I won't do it really since I intentionally left it out from the poll choices...
.

---

Why? Because Pac has a good chance of losing at 147?? What a fag.

---

Here's the purpose for this poll... So far from the result, members here favor Cotto to have his next fight at 147 preferably against Mosley... People here don't want Cotto to fight PAC at 143 catchweight...

Are you satisfied now, GAY?

http://xs540.xs.to/xs540/09254/cotpol698.jpg
.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by XaduBoxer

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by boozeboxer

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by XaduBoxer

Sorry but I can't do it... I have no MOD powers... But I won't do it really since I intentionally left it out from the poll choices...
.

---

Why? Because Pac has a good chance of losing at 147?? What a fag.

---

Here's the purpose for this poll... So far from the result, members here favor Cotto to have his next fight at 147 preferably against Mosley... People here don't want Cotto to fight PAC at 143 catchweight...

Are you satisfied now, GAY?

http://xs540.xs.to/xs540/09254/cotpol698.jpg
.

---

No I'm not. And if you fail to see the point I am trying to get into your tiny little skull, you would give up now.

We could fit all the thoughts you have had on this board on a pinhead (including the "smiley" humor) and have room to spare.

Booze wins this argument hands down. Having Cotto v Pac at only a catchweight of 143 pounds on here and then going on to make a thread suggesting a Cotto v JMM fight at 147 pounds shows Xaduboxer to be nothing more than a spin doctor. His love of Manny and loathing of JMM is transparent and is obviously reflected in the ridiculous slants he puts on things such as his polls and possible weights. Rather than allow people to have a full array of votes on his polls he limits choices to those possibilities that only he believes are acceptable.

He is manipulating this board with his own agenda. And now that he cannot do it as obviously regarding Manny Pac, he is finding other ways to pollute the main board with his absurdity. :rolleyes:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by miles

Booze wins this argument hands down. Having Cotto v Pac at only a catchweight of 143 pounds on here and then going on to make a thread suggesting a Cotto v JMM fight at 147 pounds shows Xaduboxer to be nothing more than a spin doctor. His love of Manny and loathing of JMM is transparent and is obviously reflected in the ridiculous slants he puts on things such as his polls and possible weights. Rather than allow people to have a full array of votes on his polls he limits choices to those possibilities that only he believes are acceptable.

He is manipulating this board with his own agenda. And now that he cannot do it as obviously regarding Manny Pac, he is finding other ways to pollute the main board with his absurdity. :rolleyes:

---

and again, don't forget to mention, an ignorant chickenshit ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by miles

Booze wins this argument hands down. Having Cotto v Pac at only a catchweight of 143 pounds on here and then going on to make a thread suggesting a Cotto v JMM fight at 147 pounds shows Xaduboxer to be nothing more than a spin doctor. His love of Manny and loathing of JMM is transparent and is obviously reflected in the ridiculous slants he puts on things such as his polls and possible weights. Rather than allow people to have a full array of votes on his polls he limits choices to those possibilities that only he believes are acceptable.

He is manipulating this board with his own agenda. And now that he cannot do it as obviously regarding Manny Pac, he is finding other ways to pollute the main board with his absurdity. :rolleyes:

---

and again, don't forget to mention, an ignorant chickenshit ;)

---

Ignorant ChickenShit can only be labeled to fans here like those who claimed JMM is a lineal champ at featherweight (126)... That statement is too ignorant chickenshit...
.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by XaduBoxer

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by miles

Booze wins this argument hands down. Having Cotto v Pac at only a catchweight of 143 pounds on here and then going on to make a thread suggesting a Cotto v JMM fight at 147 pounds shows Xaduboxer to be nothing more than a spin doctor. His love of Manny and loathing of JMM is transparent and is obviously reflected in the ridiculous slants he puts on things such as his polls and possible weights. Rather than allow people to have a full array of votes on his polls he limits choices to those possibilities that only he believes are acceptable.

He is manipulating this board with his own agenda. And now that he cannot do it as obviously regarding Manny Pac, he is finding other ways to pollute the main board with his absurdity. :rolleyes:

---

and again, don't forget to mention, an ignorant chickenshit ;)

---

Ignorant ChickenShit can only be labeled to fans here like those who claimed JMM is a lineal champ at featherweight (126)... That statement is too ignorant chickenshit...
.

---

don't see how that's being a chickenshit :confused: but i'm pretty sure that pussying out of more than 5 bets back to back puts you in that category;D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by XaduBoxer

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales

and again, don't forget to mention, an ignorant chickenshit ;)

---

Ignorant ChickenShit can only be labeled to fans here like those who claimed JMM is a lineal champ at featherweight (126)... That statement is too ignorant chickenshit...
.

---

don't see how that's being a chickenshit :confused: but i'm pretty sure that pussying out of more than 5 bets back to back puts you in that category;D

---

ElTerribleMorales: "JMM a lineal champ at featherweight (126 lbs.)" ... :lolhaha:

What are you, a fool? :lolhaha:
.