At what weight JMM should face Cotto if ever they fight?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by OumaFan

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by boozeboxer

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by OumaFan

Going to the 100 plus board. This is tired, and the responses are way over the top for the main board.

---

Why move it when we constantly put up with Saddoboxer's shit? WHen we call him out on it then it gets moved? That doesn't seem fair really.

I would move it to the Pac/Spam board. The best cure for infection is sunlight.

---

I don't quite grasp what everyone has to put up with? That's why we made a Manny board. So he puts a 147 pound option on one thread and not another, I have no doubt there's an ulterior motive and maybe its annoying but it just doesn't seem like that big of a deal to me.

Anyway it doesn't matter, that got way too far over the top for the main board.

---

how doesn't it matter? I asked him why he didn't have PAC-Cotto yesterday at 147 on his bullshit fox news poll and he said he had his reasons. :rolleyes:
Then today he makes a Cotto-JMM at 147 poll to insult our intelligence.

when people are full of shit we call them out on it. That's why this isn't ESB.

Exactly.

The main board's been better since the Pacquaio baord? Is there nearly as much stuff as there used to be? No. This seems like small stuff compared to when there were 80 Pac threads in the first three pages of the main board a week or so ago.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CFH

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by miles

He constantly starts this stuff. You can tell from the titles and polls that the stuff is random and inherently bound to provoke harsh responses. Maybe these threads shouldn't be being started to begin with. That is the root of the problem here. All of these threads end up getting moved or put into Spam. There is a pattern here.

You could argue that peoples responses are too strong. But when the matador is waving his red towel around people are bound to see red. It's getting old.

---

I agree that he goads people into replying in this way, but in doing so you're playing right into his hands. If you just ignore it, it has no effect and he loses whatever bizarre hold he has over this place.

The Pac section has largely contained most of this stuff and if anyone spams the main board I'm sure they'll be dealt with.

---

You get in blue and you can't enjoy a good smackdown when you see it?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by boozeboxer

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CFH

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by miles

He constantly starts this stuff. You can tell from the titles and polls that the stuff is random and inherently bound to provoke harsh responses. Maybe these threads shouldn't be being started to begin with. That is the root of the problem here. All of these threads end up getting moved or put into Spam. There is a pattern here.

You could argue that peoples responses are too strong. But when the matador is waving his red towel around people are bound to see red. It's getting old.

---

I agree that he goads people into replying in this way, but in doing so you're playing right into his hands. If you just ignore it, it has no effect and he loses whatever bizarre hold he has over this place.

The Pac section has largely contained most of this stuff and if anyone spams the main board I'm sure they'll be dealt with.

---

You get in blue and you can't enjoy a good smackdown when you see it?

---

I can enjoy it just fine when it's not on the main board. If it's on the main board myself, or another Mod, has to move it.

Edit: And is it really that much of a "smackdown" when you're giving him exactly what he wants?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by boozeboxer

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by OumaFan

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by boozeboxer

Why move it when we constantly put up with Saddoboxer's shit? WHen we call him out on it then it gets moved? That doesn't seem fair really.

I would move it to the Pac/Spam board. The best cure for infection is sunlight.

---

I don't quite grasp what everyone has to put up with? That's why we made a Manny board. So he puts a 147 pound option on one thread and not another, I have no doubt there's an ulterior motive and maybe its annoying but it just doesn't seem like that big of a deal to me.

Anyway it doesn't matter, that got way too far over the top for the main board.

---

how doesn't it matter? I asked him why he didn't have PAC-Cotto yesterday at 147 on his bullshit fox news poll and he said he had his reasons. :rolleyes:
Then today he makes a Cotto-JMM at 147 poll to insult our intelligence.

when people are full of shit we call them out on it. That's why this isn't ESB.

---

It doesn't matter in that whoever started what, the thread had to be moved because it was an over the top flame war. Like an ESB thread.

Okay so I am not arguing that it shouldn't be moved. I am like Miles though and arguing shit polls shouldn't be made to begin with.

It is all in fun. ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Nameless

To sums it up in 5 words: terrible mismatch due to size.

---

Well said, terrible mismatch due to size.... Guess you voted "JMM should not fight Cotto at all ever..." ... ;)
.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by boozeboxer

Okay so I am not arguing that it shouldn't be moved. I am like Miles though and arguing shit polls shouldn't be made to begin with.

It is all in fun. ;)

---

Maybe they shouldn't be made, I don't like seeing them either. However, creating these threads every once in a while isn't against the rules, and if you don't like it just ignore it and the thread will either die or those who wish to talk about such things will have a place to do so.

If it bothers you so much you have to say something about it, then just do it on the 100+ board so it doesn't fuck up the main board.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spicoli

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by XaduBoxer

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by C-Lo

Not possible to do when the gonads are occupied by you...



Woah! I thought my post on him was bad...

It's funny because he's the reason people's rep points have been going up. I guess we should thank him. Each time someone makes fun of him, they get repped by everyone who wants him out of here. And that's A LOT OF PEOPLE!

---

That's what I told you on the other thread that you should be grateful to me for making you a better person... but sadly you don't believe me...:(

Off-Topic: BTW, how's your right hand Mr. C-Lo? Are the calluses on your right hand not hurting anymore from the over usage? ;)
.

---

Wow....Spam-boxer is falling off ??? .Merit negs on that.Better eat your wheaties

---

Ohh so it's been moved to "Let's get it on" board...

Bro Spi, I'm just having fun at C-Lo's expense since he's attacking me more lately... Just for fun, nothing else...
.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by OumaFan

Exactly.

The main board's been better since the Pacquaio baord? Is there nearly as much stuff as there used to be? No. This seems like small stuff compared to when there were 80 Pac threads in the first three pages of the main board a week or so ago.

---

I agree that it's been good that the Pac stuff has been largely contained. This particular thread just seemed too obvious though and designed to provoke strong reactions. I agree that people shouldn't get too personal on the main boards and that is where this one slipped. I've no issues with the thread being pulled, just issues with the thread starters agenda and manipulation. It isn't a major issue and from a distance looks trite. But knowing xaduboxers history, I suppose it just grates with some people.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CFH

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by boozeboxer

Okay so I am not arguing that it shouldn't be moved. I am like Miles though and arguing shit polls shouldn't be made to begin with.

It is all in fun. ;)

---

Maybe they shouldn't be made, I don't like seeing them either. However, creating these threads every once in a while isn't against the rules, and if you don't like it just ignore it and the thread will either die or those who wish to talk about such things will have a place to do so.

If it bothers you so much you have to say something about it, then just do it on the 100+ board so it doesn't fuck up the main board.

---

I think pointing out the obvious absurd bias of a poll on a boxing subject should be pointed out. What answers you get depends on how you ask a question, and this was a bullshit question, esp. when the polls where on the same page of a boxing forum.

And I am already ahead of Xaduboxer, he was going to post the "results" from his "Polls" when he was behind in some argument that required cognitive processes and proclaim: "Saddo's own members wanted to see Cotto-PAC at 143."

You guys need to understand that it's really hard to talk about Cotto, Floyd, Marquez, Hatton, or any fighter from 135 to 147 without bringing up Pacquiao's name.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by miles

He constantly starts this stuff. You can tell from the titles and polls that the stuff is random and inherently bound to provoke harsh responses. Maybe these threads shouldn't be being started to begin with. That is the root of the problem here. All of these threads end up getting moved or put into Spam. There is a pattern here.

You could argue that peoples responses are too strong. But when the matador is waving his red towel around people are bound to see red. It's getting old.

---

Then tell me what's the problem with my poll? It's a legit question, JMM facing PBF now might face Cotto later...
.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by boozeboxer

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CFH

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by boozeboxer

Okay so I am not arguing that it shouldn't be moved. I am like Miles though and arguing shit polls shouldn't be made to begin with.

It is all in fun. ;)

---

Maybe they shouldn't be made, I don't like seeing them either. However, creating these threads every once in a while isn't against the rules, and if you don't like it just ignore it and the thread will either die or those who wish to talk about such things will have a place to do so.

If it bothers you so much you have to say something about it, then just do it on the 100+ board so it doesn't fuck up the main board.

---

I think pointing out the obvious absurd bias of a poll on a boxing subject should be pointed out. What answers you get depends on how you ask a question, and this was a bullshit question, esp. when the polls where on the same page of a boxing forum.

And I am already ahead of Xaduboxer, he was going to post the "results" from his "Polls" when he was behind in some argument that required cognitive processes and proclaim: "Saddo's own members wanted to see Cotto-PAC at 143."

---

Then point it out, but don't turn a thread on the main board into two pages of insults or it will get moved (I'm not saying you specifically turned it into two page of insults, but I think you get what I mean).

I'll say it again, when you feel the troll you are giving him exactly what he wants.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CFH

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by boozeboxer

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CFH

Maybe they shouldn't be made, I don't like seeing them either. However, creating these threads every once in a while isn't against the rules, and if you don't like it just ignore it and the thread will either die or those who wish to talk about such things will have a place to do so.

If it bothers you so much you have to say something about it, then just do it on the 100+ board so it doesn't fuck up the main board.

---

I think pointing out the obvious absurd bias of a poll on a boxing subject should be pointed out. What answers you get depends on how you ask a question, and this was a bullshit question, esp. when the polls where on the same page of a boxing forum.

And I am already ahead of Xaduboxer, he was going to post the "results" from his "Polls" when he was behind in some argument that required cognitive processes and proclaim: "Saddo's own members wanted to see Cotto-PAC at 143."

---

Then point it out, but don't turn a thread on the main board into two pages of insults or it will get moved (I'm not saying you specifically turned it into two page of insults, but I think you get what I mean).

I'll say it again, when you feel the troll you are giving him exactly what he wants.

---

I thought it was the boys in blue that controlled the trolls. ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by boozeboxer

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CFH

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by boozeboxer

Okay so I am not arguing that it shouldn't be moved. I am like Miles though and arguing shit polls shouldn't be made to begin with.

It is all in fun. ;)

---

Maybe they shouldn't be made, I don't like seeing them either. However, creating these threads every once in a while isn't against the rules, and if you don't like it just ignore it and the thread will either die or those who wish to talk about such things will have a place to do so.

If it bothers you so much you have to say something about it, then just do it on the 100+ board so it doesn't fuck up the main board.

---

I think pointing out the obvious absurd bias of a poll on a boxing subject should be pointed out. What answers you get depends on how you ask a question, and this was a bullshit question, esp. when the polls where on the same page of a boxing forum.

And I am already ahead of Xaduboxer, he was going to post the "results" from his "Polls" when he was behind in some argument that required cognitive processes and proclaim: "Saddo's own members wanted to see Cotto-PAC at 143."

---

OK I'll give you a chance, try to correct the problem you see in this poll... I like to see how you will construct this poll, what are the options?
.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by XaduBoxer

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by boozeboxer

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CFH

Maybe they shouldn't be made, I don't like seeing them either. However, creating these threads every once in a while isn't against the rules, and if you don't like it just ignore it and the thread will either die or those who wish to talk about such things will have a place to do so.

If it bothers you so much you have to say something about it, then just do it on the 100+ board so it doesn't fuck up the main board.

---

I think pointing out the obvious absurd bias of a poll on a boxing subject should be pointed out. What answers you get depends on how you ask a question, and this was a bullshit question, esp. when the polls where on the same page of a boxing forum.

And I am already ahead of Xaduboxer, he was going to post the "results" from his "Polls" when he was behind in some argument that required cognitive processes and proclaim: "Saddo's own members wanted to see Cotto-PAC at 143."

---

OK I'll give you a chance, try to correct the problem you see in this poll... I like to see how you will construct this poll, what are the options?
.

---

You would construct a PAC-Cotto one exactly like you did the JMM one. :confused:

Instead of throwing Berto, Cintron, and others in (like you give a shit about anyone other than Pac and Nonito) to fill the gaps and to add some tinted legitmacy to your poll but at the same time just have Pac-Cotto at 143.

Yeah, we won;t see through that. :rolleyes:

How about a look of who shits on the front-lawn first eh in regards to responses.?Might as well give him a top hat.Do the math.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by boozeboxer

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CFH

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by boozeboxer

I think pointing out the obvious absurd bias of a poll on a boxing subject should be pointed out. What answers you get depends on how you ask a question, and this was a bullshit question, esp. when the polls where on the same page of a boxing forum.

And I am already ahead of Xaduboxer, he was going to post the "results" from his "Polls" when he was behind in some argument that required cognitive processes and proclaim: "Saddo's own members wanted to see Cotto-PAC at 143."

---

Then point it out, but don't turn a thread on the main board into two pages of insults or it will get moved (I'm not saying you specifically turned it into two page of insults, but I think you get what I mean).

I'll say it again, when you feel the troll you are giving him exactly what he wants.

---

I thought it was the boys in blue that controlled the trolls. ;)

---

We can't ban people for being annoying.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CFH

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by boozeboxer

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CFH

Then point it out, but don't turn a thread on the main board into two pages of insults or it will get moved (I'm not saying you specifically turned it into two page of insults, but I think you get what I mean).

I'll say it again, when you feel the troll you are giving him exactly what he wants.

---

I thought it was the boys in blue that controlled the trolls. ;)

---

We can't ban people for being annoying.

---

that is what neg rep's are for.

I am going to put Xaduboxer on ignore. I recommend anyone else who doesn't appreciate his trolling posting do so also. I've never put a person on ignore ever on a message board, and I belong to a lot of them and am pretty good at just ignoring those that I have no interest in reading by not clicking their threads.

But I am considering this an experiment. Trolls exist and thrive on reaction. Remove the temptation to react, the ability to, you remove their fuel. What I suspect you are left with is a babbling bafoon, mostly talking to themselves. A vehicle that will soon run out of gas.

So this is what I am doing right after hitting Submit Reply, and I encourage others, heck everyone who has issues with him to do the same. Save a board. Starve a troll.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by boozeboxer

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by XaduBoxer

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by boozeboxer

I think pointing out the obvious absurd bias of a poll on a boxing subject should be pointed out. What answers you get depends on how you ask a question, and this was a bullshit question, esp. when the polls where on the same page of a boxing forum.

And I am already ahead of Xaduboxer, he was going to post the "results" from his "Polls" when he was behind in some argument that required cognitive processes and proclaim: "Saddo's own members wanted to see Cotto-PAC at 143."

---

OK I'll give you a chance, try to correct the problem you see in this poll... I like to see how you will construct this poll, what are the options?
.

---

You would construct a PAC-Cotto one exactly like you did the JMM one. :confused:

Instead of throwing Berto, Cintron, and others in (like you give a shit about anyone other than Pac and Nonito) to fill the gaps and to add some tinted legitmacy to your poll but at the same time just have Pac-Cotto at 143.

Yeah, we won;t see through that. :rolleyes:

---

The purpose of the first poll is to see if people here will scrap an exciting PAC-Cotto fight at 143 catchweight in favor of any fight at 147 against various legit welters that's why there's no "PAC-Cotto at 147" coz if I included that option, I have a feeling that option will win that poll...

It's kind of "PAC-Cotto at catchweight" or no "PAC-Cotto" fight at all...

The 2nd poll has no relation whatsoever to the 1st poll... Hope you got it...
.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Youngblood

I am going to put Xaduboxer on ignore. I recommend anyone else who doesn't appreciate his trolling posting do so also. I've never put a person on ignore ever on a message board, and I belong to a lot of them and am pretty good at just ignoring those that I have no interest in reading by not clicking their threads.

But I am considering this an experiment. Trolls exist and thrive on reaction. Remove the temptation to react, the ability to, you remove their fuel. What I suspect you are left with is a babbling bafoon, mostly talking to themselves. A vehicle that will soon run out of gas.

So this is what I am doing right after hitting Submit Reply, and I encourage others, heck everyone who has issues with him to do the same. Save a board. Starve a troll.

---

Can you still neg rep someone on ignore?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Quinito

You guys need to understand that it's really hard to talk about Cotto, Floyd, Marquez, Hatton, or any fighter from 135 to 147 without bringing up Pacquiao's name.

---

That's why when in a few days ago there was some thread about Cotto-Pac or something we didn't move it from the main board. We know that's an issue with having a separate Manny board.

I'm not sure how relevant that was to all of this.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Youngblood

I am going to put Xaduboxer on ignore. I recommend anyone else who doesn't appreciate his trolling posting do so also. I've never put a person on ignore ever on a message board, and I belong to a lot of them and am pretty good at just ignoring those that I have no interest in reading by not clicking their threads.

But I am considering this an experiment. Trolls exist and thrive on reaction. Remove the temptation to react, the ability to, you remove their fuel. What I suspect you are left with is a babbling bafoon, mostly talking to themselves. A vehicle that will soon run out of gas.

So this is what I am doing right after hitting Submit Reply, and I encourage others, heck everyone who has issues with him to do the same. Save a board. Starve a troll.

---

It's your call mate... got no problem with that... anyway, I seldom interact with you... you seems to be ignoring me ever since... joke ;D
.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by XaduBoxer

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by boozeboxer

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by XaduBoxer

OK I'll give you a chance, try to correct the problem you see in this poll... I like to see how you will construct this poll, what are the options?
.

---

You would construct a PAC-Cotto one exactly like you did the JMM one. :confused:

Instead of throwing Berto, Cintron, and others in (like you give a shit about anyone other than Pac and Nonito) to fill the gaps and to add some tinted legitmacy to your poll but at the same time just have Pac-Cotto at 143.

Yeah, we won;t see through that. :rolleyes:

---

The purpose of the first poll is to see if people here will scrap an exciting PAC-Cotto fight at 143 catchweight in favor of any fight at 147 against various legit welters that's why there's no "PAC-Cotto at 147" coz if I included that option, I have a feeling that option will win that poll...

The 2nd poll has no relation whatsoever to the 1st poll... Hope you got it...
.

---

So you had a feeling that a fight that would win the poll, which just so happened to be your fighter, and you didn't put it on the poll. Interesting.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by XaduBoxer

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by miles

He constantly starts this stuff. You can tell from the titles and polls that the stuff is random and inherently bound to provoke harsh responses. Maybe these threads shouldn't be being started to begin with. That is the root of the problem here. All of these threads end up getting moved or put into Spam. There is a pattern here.

You could argue that peoples responses are too strong. But when the matador is waving his red towel around people are bound to see red. It's getting old.

---

Then tell me what's the problem with my poll? It's a legit question, JMM facing PBF now might face Cotto later...
.

---

I pointed out the inconsistencies earlier on this thread and also on the other thread on the main board. Perhaps you overlooked them.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by boozeboxer

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by XaduBoxer

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by boozeboxer

You would construct a PAC-Cotto one exactly like you did the JMM one. :confused:

Instead of throwing Berto, Cintron, and others in (like you give a shit about anyone other than Pac and Nonito) to fill the gaps and to add some tinted legitmacy to your poll but at the same time just have Pac-Cotto at 143.

Yeah, we won;t see through that. :rolleyes:

---

The purpose of the first poll is to see if people here will scrap an exciting PAC-Cotto fight at 143 catchweight in favor of any fight at 147 against various legit welters that's why there's no "PAC-Cotto at 147" coz if I included that option, I have a feeling that option will win that poll...

The 2nd poll has no relation whatsoever to the 1st poll... Hope you got it...
.

---

So you had a feeling that a fight that would win the poll, which just so happened to be your fighter, and you didn't put it on the poll. Interesting.

---

Did you get the purpose of my 1st poll? It's kind of "PAC-Cotto at catchweight" or no "PAC-Cotto" fight at all...

Hope you get it now...
.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by XaduBoxer

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by boozeboxer

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by XaduBoxer

The purpose of the first poll is to see if people here will scrap an exciting PAC-Cotto fight at 143 catchweight in favor of any fight at 147 against various legit welters that's why there's no "PAC-Cotto at 147" coz if I included that option, I have a feeling that option will win that poll...

The 2nd poll has no relation whatsoever to the 1st poll... Hope you got it...
.

---

So you had a feeling that a fight that would win the poll, which just so happened to be your fighter, and you didn't put it on the poll. Interesting.

---

Did you get the purpose of my 1st poll? It's kind of "PAC-Cotto at catchweight" or no "PAC-Cotto" fight at all...

Hope you get it now...
.

---

And then you put a JMM-Cotto fight at 147. THATS THE FUCKING POINT YOU MORON.


Look I am going to bed, your stamina is remarkable......that is one thing about PAC fans, they have stamina.

I can't believe I have been arguing with a turnip. However, I don't blame you for your shortcomings on the board Xaduboxer. I think you are either very smart and biased or really dumb.

And I don't think you are very smart.

However, you have kept us entertained on a pretty slow night in one way or another. Like a 2 dollar hooker....you get what you pay for.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by boozeboxer

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by XaduBoxer

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by boozeboxer

So you had a feeling that a fight that would win the poll, which just so happened to be your fighter, and you didn't put it on the poll. Interesting.

---

Did you get the purpose of my 1st poll? It's kind of "PAC-Cotto at catchweight" or no "PAC-Cotto" fight at all...

Hope you get it now...
.

---

And then you put a JMM-Cotto fight at 147. THATS THE FUCKING POINT YOU MORON.


Look I am going to bed, your stamina is remarkable......that is one thing about PAC fans, they have stamina.

I can't believe I have been arguing with a turnip. However, I don't blame you for your shortcomings on the board Xaduboxer. I think you are either very smart and biased or really dumb.

And I don't think you are very smart.

However, you have kept us entertained on a pretty slow night in one way or another. Like a 2 dollar hooker....you get what you pay for.

---

You're so dumb if you're thinking it's my time to sleep too...;D

"JMM-Cotto at 147" is a possibility that why it's there... It even got 2 votes... BTW I voted for 143...

You've been protesting that option coz you relate it to the other poll... Those 2 polls not related at all ... 2 separate and different polls...
.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by boozeboxer

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Youngblood

I am going to put Xaduboxer on ignore. I recommend anyone else who doesn't appreciate his trolling posting do so also. I've never put a person on ignore ever on a message board, and I belong to a lot of them and am pretty good at just ignoring those that I have no interest in reading by not clicking their threads.

But I am considering this an experiment. Trolls exist and thrive on reaction. Remove the temptation to react, the ability to, you remove their fuel. What I suspect you are left with is a babbling bafoon, mostly talking to themselves. A vehicle that will soon run out of gas.

So this is what I am doing right after hitting Submit Reply, and I encourage others, heck everyone who has issues with him to do the same. Save a board. Starve a troll.

---

Can you still neg rep someone on ignore?

---

Not that I am aware of, but so far so good for me. Now if you guys would stop quoting him, that would be one step better :p

I understand what ya all are saying regarding the neg. repping him, and even suggested it myself before, we unite and mass neg rep him...but that is a negative response too, the thing they crave. So I'm going to leave it at that. I think it is the best option, others may not agree, but it is the one I'm going with.

Damn Booze...You gave him $2?! I would say he's one of those that do it for free, as long as you know who Pac is...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by XaduBoxer

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spicoli

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by XaduBoxer

That's what I told you on the other thread that you should be grateful to me for making you a better person... but sadly you don't believe me...:(

Off-Topic: BTW, how's your right hand Mr. C-Lo? Are the calluses on your right hand not hurting anymore from the over usage? ;)
.

---

Wow....Spam-boxer is falling off ??? .Merit negs on that.Better eat your wheaties

---

Ohh so it's been moved to "Let's get it on" board...

Bro Spi, I'm just having fun at C-Lo's expense since he's attacking me more lately... Just for fun, nothing else...
.

---

Me attacking you more lately? I think everyone has been attacking you more lately...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by C-Lo

Damn Booze...You gave him $2?! I would say he's one of those that do it for free, as long as you know who Pac is...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by XaduBoxer

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spicoli

Wow....Spam-boxer is falling off ??? .Merit negs on that.Better eat your wheaties

---

Ohh so it's been moved to "Let's get it on" board...

Bro Spi, I'm just having fun at C-Lo's expense since he's attacking me more lately... Just for fun, nothing else...
.

---

Me attacking you more lately? I think everyone has been attacking you more lately...

---

Others are the usual suspects... Yours kind of just lately... Maybe I overlooked your earlier attacks... ;)
.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by XaduBoxer

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by C-Lo

Damn Booze...You gave him $2?! I would say he's one of those that do it for free, as long as you know who Pac is...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by XaduBoxer

Ohh so it's been moved to "Let's get it on" board...

Bro Spi, I'm just having fun at C-Lo's expense since he's attacking me more lately... Just for fun, nothing else...
.

---

Me attacking you more lately? I think everyone has been attacking you more lately...

---

Others are the usual suspects... Yours kind of just lately... Maybe I overlooked your earlier attacks... ;)
.

---

At first I thought you were ok, you always kept us updated on Pac. And when I doubted him, you made me think otherwise.

But then I gradually saw more and more how you really were. I guess it took me a while to figure out. You are manipulative, you know nothing about boxing, you avoid certain comments or sidestep them when people have you backed into a corner, you're basically like Moono who was forced out of the forum.

Either way, you're a tool now and will probably never get away from that because everyone here thinks you're a joke. Maybe you do like hearing this from people? Maybe you get your jollies by working people up? But the thing is, I like making fun of people especially when it's warrented. So if you like it when people talk about you, you're in luck!

heavyweight

i wanna see 2 fat f*cks beat on eachother

the victor could have a winner takes all flabking showdown with arreola with the victor promised an unlimited supply of slimjims for the year ;D;D;D

Youngblood. You will not get any kind of message at all from the person you put on your ignore list. They can rep or neg rep you, but wont be able to read their message. I think its the greatest forum tool. Lol!