Re: Should Maidana have been deducted the point for the transaparent elbow?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Taeth
I feel it was warranted, I think Maidana could have also had points taken away plenty of other times for rabid punching.
To my knowledge, he doesn't have rabies.
Re: Should Maidana have been deducted the point for the transaparent elbow?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ono
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Taeth
I feel it was warranted, I think Maidana could have also had points taken away plenty of other times for rabid punching.
To my knowledge, he doesn't have rabies.
;D
Re: Should Maidana have been deducted the point for the transaparent elbow?
Of course he should have had a point deducted.In a game where violence is parts of its nature the ref has to be in charge at all times and if a boxer has so little respect for the rules and the ref he desurves to have a point off.
Maidana was lucky it did not catch him in the head and then the shit would fly.
Not even mad Mike Tyson went for the ref.
Re: Should Maidana have been deducted the point for the transaparent elbow?
If you try to shoot someone, but accidentally miss & hit a parked car, should you just be charged with criminal damage or attempted murder. If Maidana had landed that elbow he would have been DQ'd. Simple. So a point was completely fair. A DQ would have been too much, but a point was just right, a rarity for Cortez.
Miles, we all know you would be in a right tiz if this was the other way round, arguing that Cortez had been a coward for not DQing Khan on the spot.
