I'd like to see a rematch, that was a bad way for the fight to end.Quote:
Originally Posted by Spicoli
Printable View
I'd like to see a rematch, that was a bad way for the fight to end.Quote:
Originally Posted by Spicoli
Both of these guys are going where they will, but it's just as well Lopez got that stoppage imo. He's guaranteed entertainment and can be a great gatekeeper, guy can't put on a bad show. He'd make good fights with Alvarado or Rios on the comeback trail and could win those, or the loser of Broner-Maidana, Thurman-Karass etc.
Sorry, but I disagree! Arnaoutis had a lot to do with making that an exciting fight. I believe Arnaoutis deserves a rematch.Quote:
Originally Posted by p4pking
I don't think Lopez was well enough prepared for this fight, but that is beside the point. Arnaoutis made this a good fight.
Gotta agree there, Lopez really doesn't do anything different from any other free swinger. Mike really kept it together and picked his spots nicely. A rematch would be deserved as ending was mucked up.Quote:
Originally Posted by beenKOedSorry, but I disagree! Arnaoutis had a lot to do with making that an exciting fight. I believe Arnaoutis deserves a rematch.Quote:
Originally Posted by p4pking
I don't think Lopez was well enough prepared for this fight, but that is beside the point. Arnaoutis made this a good fight.
Wasn't clear on conversation in corner but likewise I don't recall a ref lawyering a Dr like that recently. If a fighter says he cannot see...4,5 times! Then that's a wrap. You don't ask a Dr "can you confirm that" ???
One last thing/question. When Arnaoutis was being asked if he could see out of the eye. Do you think he was saying? "No, I can't see now!" or "No, I can't see when I'm bleeding!"
The ref and the doc were asking about that moment but Arnaoutis was talking about when he was fighting and bleeding.
What else could have prompted that odd question? "Can you confirm that?"
If you think I'm wrong, tell me. I'm interested.