Re: floyd drops WBC title to avoid pacman
Quote:
Originally Posted by
imp
Floyd should go to 168 and fight ward.
If he doesnt hes ducking him.
Not really....however if he was his biggest rival, in the same division and the number 1 contender he most definitely would be!
Re: floyd drops WBC title to avoid pacman
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanflicker
I'm not saying Lara isn't a tough challenge for him. I think of anyone 154 or below, Lara has the best chance to beat him.
But you're talking Vegas odds. They're not going to put Lara as the favorite.
BTW I like how Froch gets listed as an elite fighter, but not Hatton.
Hatton has only really got any due credit of many since he retired as the years passed, even after the ending with Senchenko!!
Re: floyd drops WBC title to avoid pacman
Quote:
Originally Posted by
DavilaJones
To ask a guy who started out at lightweight to fight a middleweight when there's competition still at welter is a bit silly gents.
Again I have no problem with this. But he is willing to fight at light middle, first time 6 years ago. So why not fight GGG or Martinez or Lara at light middle?
Re: floyd drops WBC title to avoid pacman
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mofo2
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanflicker
I'm not saying Lara isn't a tough challenge for him. I think of anyone 154 or below, Lara has the best chance to beat him.
But you're talking Vegas odds. They're not going to put Lara as the favorite.
BTW I like how Froch gets listed as an elite fighter, but not Hatton.
Hatton has only really got any due credit of many since he retired as the years passed, even after the ending with Senchenko!!
I like Hatton but can you call him elite? He lost to pac and floyd and his best win is probably a contraversial win over Kosta Tszyu. Other then that he beat an old Castillo and Paulie. Froch beat Taylor, Dirrel, Abraham, Kesseler, Groves, Pascal, Bute. I suppose you can say some of these were washed up and some were contreversial. Both are borderline calls for me and wouldnt argue either way.
Re: floyd drops WBC title to avoid pacman
Quote:
Originally Posted by
imp
This pac vs floyd stuff is killing me.
Pac needs to avenge his losses to bradley and marquez before even thinking about floyd.
With marquez being 40 yrs old, perhaps pac might beat him this time if his legs dont cramp and ariza is back in his corner.
Would pac even beat broner?!!
Or khan?
wtf, pac walks through broner, maidana, and kahn. Cant avenge a loss if the opponent keeps running and refuses rematches.