Vitali would have been better if he had a higher number of defences and was not so injury prone. He didn't and wasn't so he should be lower.Quote:
Originally Posted by Nameless
Printable View
Vitali would have been better if he had a higher number of defences and was not so injury prone. He didn't and wasn't so he should be lower.Quote:
Originally Posted by Nameless
I always though Vitali was a better fighter than his brother. Bigger, tougher, harder puncher, chin like concrete.
He would have been competitive against any heavyweight who ever lived
I wouldn'T say he was that much injury prone; he had one very significant injury to his knee, the rest didn't hold him back that much. When a guy has a KO ratio of 87% against the best of his era, that speaks volume, to me.Quote:
Originally Posted by MasterVitali would have been better if he had a higher number of defences and was not so injury prone. He didn't and wasn't so he should be lower.Quote:
Originally Posted by Nameless
He had back and shoulder issues as well.....Vitali was just wore out from so many rounds in the ring be it amateur boxing, kickboxing, whatever.Quote:
Originally Posted by NamelessI wouldn'T say he was that much injury prone; he had one very significant injury to his knee, the rest didn't hold him back that much. When a guy has a KO ratio of 87% against the best of his era, that speaks volume, to me.Quote:
Originally Posted by MasterVitali would have been better if he had a higher number of defences and was not so injury prone. He didn't and wasn't so he should be lower.Quote:
Originally Posted by Nameless
I think it's always been the case that Vitali is the natural FIGHTER and Wladimir is the better BOXER who would win in a real bout between them is a hard ask as they are brothers and sure people on here say "Well brothers fight all the time growing up and everything" but when it's a prize fight it's like asking them to duel to the death because that's ALWAYS a possibility in the ring and who out there is going to legit hurt their own flesh and blood and when they're hurt land those final blows to knock your BROTHER unconscious? Which one of the posters here at Saddo's would do that? None of you! Or I'd HOPE none of you would do that...you'd have to be a sociopath.
I'm not saying boxers who are opponents can't be friends or whatever, surely it's happened before and even then we see some stinkers because the guys don't want to hurt each other for example Byrd vs Williamson "Both Byrd and Williamson (22-4) fought like good friends in the opening round, barely throwing a punch between them as the crowd quickly started booing." - Thomas Gerabasi .....and yet people are all 'Why didn't they ever fight? I hold that against them!'.....well you people out there thinking that are retarded
Of course not accusing X, Nameless, or Master of being the people who always called for them to fight just saying
I did Taekwondo for many years, and so did my younger brother (he was better than me) and we would often spar.
I had lots of good level amateur boxing matches too, but would never spar with my brother, and wouldn't have ever fought him properly.
Proper boxing is a serious business, and the point is to hurt you opponent as quickly as possible. That's different from many other combat sports where the idea is to score points etc
I completely understand why two brothers would not want to have a professional boxing match between each other.
and I also agree with Lyle in that Vitali was a born FIGHTER whereas Wlad is the more talented BOXER, it's also something both Klitshkos have said in the past
If I saw my boys fighting one another I would clip both them on the head and tell them off. Brothers should never seriously fight one another, it is wrong.