-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ron Swanson
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
GaMo
Knocking out Khan was funny and it added to both the bank account and the highlight reel. Not sure how knocking a guy cold makes you look bad... but if that’s the logic I’ve come to expect from this place. I honestly don’t care if Alvarez and Golovkin beat up Welterweights as every fighter takes a soft fight now and then. You can defend Golovkin for it but he’s the champion (apparently) he should be defending against people in his own division
Knocking out Khan was funny and it added to both the bank account and the highlight reel.
Agreed
Not sure how knocking a guy cold makes you look bad... but if that’s the logic I’ve come to expect from this place.
Well you're in luck as I'll explain it to you. The knockout doesn't make him look bad, the fact that they had to resort to not only fighting somebody 1 1/2 to 2 weights lower, but someone widely recognised as
A. Chinny
B. Feather fisted
C. Not in the top 10 of his own weight ffs. And
D. The closest thing to Lord Lucan in Boxing.
I honestly don’t care if Alvarez and Golovkin beat up Welterweights as every fighter takes a soft fight now and then.
Liar! You are forever digging out GGG for fighting Brook!
You can defend Golovkin for it but he’s the champion (apparently) he should be defending against people in his own division
See, you do care! Like I said, Golovkin wanted a fight, nobody wanted to fight him. He had to find a late replacement because your mate and his Dad bottled it (I notice you've chose to ignore that fact, because you have no answer as to why your little Bum boy superstar was scared as fuck!;D)
Golovkin has no previous for picking smaller guys , whereas Oscar constantly cherry picked smaller guys than Canelo for fights with his little "Caneloweight" matchups.
That little option has now been shut off as he won't be making less than 160 anytime soon.
So, the only catch weights he'll be doing are between 160 & 168. He's already done The obvious one in JCC Jr. so good luck with that. ;D
Love your post, but... GGG actually actually does have a sizable history of picking smaller guys.
Smaller guys than himself? With the exception of Brook and we know the story behind that , please name them.
-
Re: Golovkin v Alvarez rematch May 2018
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ron Swanson
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
GaMo
Knocking out Khan was funny and it added to both the bank account and the highlight reel. Not sure how knocking a guy cold makes you look bad... but if that’s the logic I’ve come to expect from this place. I honestly don’t care if Alvarez and Golovkin beat up Welterweights as every fighter takes a soft fight now and then. You can defend Golovkin for it but he’s the champion (apparently) he should be defending against people in his own division
Knocking out Khan was funny and it added to both the bank account and the highlight reel.
Agreed
Not sure how knocking a guy cold makes you look bad... but if that’s the logic I’ve come to expect from this place.
Well you're in luck as I'll explain it to you. The knockout doesn't make him look bad, the fact that they had to resort to not only fighting somebody 1 1/2 to 2 weights lower, but someone widely recognised as
A. Chinny
B. Feather fisted
C. Not in the top 10 of his own weight ffs. And
D. The closest thing to Lord Lucan in Boxing.
I honestly don’t care if Alvarez and Golovkin beat up Welterweights as every fighter takes a soft fight now and then.
Liar! You are forever digging out GGG for fighting Brook!
You can defend Golovkin for it but he’s the champion (apparently) he should be defending against people in his own division
See, you do care! Like I said, Golovkin wanted a fight, nobody wanted to fight him. He had to find a late replacement because your mate and his Dad bottled it (I notice you've chose to ignore that fact, because you have no answer as to why your little Bum boy superstar was scared as fuck!;D)
Golovkin has no previous for picking smaller guys , whereas Oscar constantly cherry picked smaller guys than Canelo for fights with his little "Caneloweight" matchups.
That little option has now been shut off as he won't be making less than 160 anytime soon.
So, the only catch weights he'll be doing are between 160 & 168. He's already done The obvious one in JCC Jr. so good luck with that. ;D
Love your post, but... GGG actually actually does have a sizable history of picking smaller guys.
Smaller guys than himself? With the exception of Brook and we know the story behind that , please name them.
Just look at all the guys from 154/147 and you’ll understand what I mean.
Also, I think people get caught thinking of size in limited ways. A person can hunch over and contract their traps/rhomboids/chest and make themselves shorter/narrower like GGG does or stick their chest out and high to make themselves appear as big as possible as most men will do.
I’m not saying GGG is huge, but he fought at 165 as a child. He’s not tiny. Most grow into their real size. He shrank into his real size. This suggests if he stops training he will get big fast. So not so small.
-
Re: Golovkin v Alvarez rematch May 2018
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ron Swanson
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
GaMo
Knocking out Khan was funny and it added to both the bank account and the highlight reel. Not sure how knocking a guy cold makes you look bad... but if that’s the logic I’ve come to expect from this place. I honestly don’t care if Alvarez and Golovkin beat up Welterweights as every fighter takes a soft fight now and then. You can defend Golovkin for it but he’s the champion (apparently) he should be defending against people in his own division
Knocking out Khan was funny and it added to both the bank account and the highlight reel.
Agreed
Not sure how knocking a guy cold makes you look bad... but if that’s the logic I’ve come to expect from this place.
Well you're in luck as I'll explain it to you. The knockout doesn't make him look bad, the fact that they had to resort to not only fighting somebody 1 1/2 to 2 weights lower, but someone widely recognised as
A. Chinny
B. Feather fisted
C. Not in the top 10 of his own weight ffs. And
D. The closest thing to Lord Lucan in Boxing.
I honestly don’t care if Alvarez and Golovkin beat up Welterweights as every fighter takes a soft fight now and then.
Liar! You are forever digging out GGG for fighting Brook!
You can defend Golovkin for it but he’s the champion (apparently) he should be defending against people in his own division
See, you do care! Like I said, Golovkin wanted a fight, nobody wanted to fight him. He had to find a late replacement because your mate and his Dad bottled it (I notice you've chose to ignore that fact, because you have no answer as to why your little Bum boy superstar was scared as fuck!;D)
Golovkin has no previous for picking smaller guys , whereas Oscar constantly cherry picked smaller guys than Canelo for fights with his little "Caneloweight" matchups.
That little option has now been shut off as he won't be making less than 160 anytime soon.
So, the only catch weights he'll be doing are between 160 & 168. He's already done The obvious one in JCC Jr. so good luck with that. ;D
Love your post, but... GGG actually actually does have a sizable history of picking smaller guys.
Smaller guys than himself? With the exception of Brook and we know the story behind that , please name them.
Canelo started at 147
-
Re: Golovkin v Alvarez rematch May 2018
The worst thing about Canelo is that at the prime of his career he is already In this "diva like status" of fighting twice a year when he should have fought this December.
We all now have to wait 8 months for the rematch..8 months!
GGG is the undefeated champion and it's silly that he has to accept the B side status which is quite ridiculous when he's prepared to fight sooner.
Canelo is a good fighter, but with its obvious the whole Golden boy team are trying to drag this rematch out so GGG gets old.
I still found the first fight entertaining with Canelo making the quality shots but he should run with the momentum and fight someone else in the interim.
-
Re: Golovkin v Alvarez rematch May 2018
So?....:-\
Where? Would Canelo be booed in his own back yard? Will Oscar ensure that next time, just to be certain, that CJ Ross joins Adalaide Byrde and A.N.Other?
Does GGG fill time with Saunders and collect the last Panini sticker or rematch Jacobs and put a full stop on the verdict?
-
Re: Golovkin v Alvarez rematch May 2018
Not sure why you're all talking about GGG winning the WBO belt... Saunders isn't going to fight him and you should all know that by now. The faggot is calling out Amir Khan for fuck sake.
-
Re: Golovkin v Alvarez rematch May 2018
Quote:
Originally Posted by
GaMo
Not sure why you're all talking about GGG winning the WBO belt... Saunders isn't going to fight him and you should all know that by now. The faggot is calling out Amir Khan for fuck sake.
people are just pissed about having to wait so long for rematch, they would rather see him in a gimme fight before May
-
Re: Golovkin v Alvarez rematch May 2018
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Batman
Quote:
Originally Posted by
GaMo
Not sure why you're all talking about GGG winning the WBO belt... Saunders isn't going to fight him and you should all know that by now. The faggot is calling out Amir Khan for fuck sake.
people are just pissed about having to wait so long for rematch, they would rather see him in a gimme fight before May
I’m sure Jacobs is available for GGG is he’s that desperate to fight
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
GaMo
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Batman
Quote:
Originally Posted by
GaMo
Not sure why you're all talking about GGG winning the WBO belt... Saunders isn't going to fight him and you should all know that by now. The faggot is calling out Amir Khan for fuck sake.
people are just pissed about having to wait so long for rematch, they would rather see him in a gimme fight before May
I’m sure Jacobs is available for GGG is he’s that desperate to fight
You would love that in the hope that Golovkin loses or gets hurt in the process so that the golden child can win in May.
-
Re: Golovkin v Alvarez rematch May 2018
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
GaMo
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Batman
Quote:
Originally Posted by
GaMo
Not sure why you're all talking about GGG winning the WBO belt... Saunders isn't going to fight him and you should all know that by now. The faggot is calling out Amir Khan for fuck sake.
people are just pissed about having to wait so long for rematch, they would rather see him in a gimme fight before May
I’m sure Jacobs is available for GGG is he’s that desperate to fight
You would love that in the hope that Golovkin loses or gets hurt in the process so that the golden child can win in May.
If he’s as good as you think he is then he could be able to beat Jacobs and Alvarez no problem.
-
Re: Golovkin v Alvarez rematch May 2018
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
GaMo
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Batman
Quote:
Originally Posted by
GaMo
Not sure why you're all talking about GGG winning the WBO belt... Saunders isn't going to fight him and you should all know that by now. The faggot is calling out Amir Khan for fuck sake.
people are just pissed about having to wait so long for rematch, they would rather see him in a gimme fight before May
I’m sure Jacobs is available for GGG is he’s that desperate to fight
You would love that in the hope that Golovkin loses or gets hurt in the process so that the golden child can win in May.
I would love it because I think the best should fight the best. Instead of waiting so long to see him vs Canelo again. Then what BJS? When do we get to best vs best?
-
Re: Golovkin v Alvarez rematch May 2018
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ron Swanson
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ron Swanson
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
GaMo
Knocking out Khan was funny and it added to both the bank account and the highlight reel. Not sure how knocking a guy cold makes you look bad... but if that’s the logic I’ve come to expect from this place. I honestly don’t care if Alvarez and Golovkin beat up Welterweights as every fighter takes a soft fight now and then. You can defend Golovkin for it but he’s the champion (apparently) he should be defending against people in his own division
Knocking out Khan was funny and it added to both the bank account and the highlight reel.
Agreed
Not sure how knocking a guy cold makes you look bad... but if that’s the logic I’ve come to expect from this place.
Well you're in luck as I'll explain it to you. The knockout doesn't make him look bad, the fact that they had to resort to not only fighting somebody 1 1/2 to 2 weights lower, but someone widely recognised as
A. Chinny
B. Feather fisted
C. Not in the top 10 of his own weight ffs. And
D. The closest thing to Lord Lucan in Boxing.
I honestly don’t care if Alvarez and Golovkin beat up Welterweights as every fighter takes a soft fight now and then.
Liar! You are forever digging out GGG for fighting Brook!
You can defend Golovkin for it but he’s the champion (apparently) he should be defending against people in his own division
See, you do care! Like I said, Golovkin wanted a fight, nobody wanted to fight him. He had to find a late replacement because your mate and his Dad bottled it (I notice you've chose to ignore that fact, because you have no answer as to why your little Bum boy superstar was scared as fuck!;D)
Golovkin has no previous for picking smaller guys , whereas Oscar constantly cherry picked smaller guys than Canelo for fights with his little "Caneloweight" matchups.
That little option has now been shut off as he won't be making less than 160 anytime soon.
So, the only catch weights he'll be doing are between 160 & 168. He's already done The obvious one in JCC Jr. so good luck with that. ;D
Love your post, but... GGG actually actually does have a sizable history of picking smaller guys.
Smaller guys than himself? With the exception of Brook and we know the story behind that , please name them.
Just look at all the guys from 154/147 and you’ll understand what I mean.
Also, I think people get caught thinking of size in limited ways. A person can hunch over and contract their traps/rhomboids/chest and make themselves shorter/narrower like GGG does or stick their chest out and high to make themselves appear as big as possible as most men will do.
I’m not saying GGG is huge, but he fought at 165 as a child. He’s not tiny. Most grow into their real size. He shrank into his real size. This suggests if he stops training he will get big fast. So not so small.
So, I asked a question and you took 3 paragraphs to avoid an answer.
As for "he fought at 165 as a child, etc.etc.
Andre Ward fought in the amateurs at LHW, fought most of his career at SMW, Bellew fought as an amateur at HW, fought most of his career at LHW.
Some guys when they move from amateur to pro go down a weight, because they are training much harder, eating better and consequently are leaner.
Some obviously go the other way it's just the way it is.
But anyway, apart from Brook, GGG bona fide MW's at the MW limit. Some even went up in weight as they were BIGGER than him (Murray for example.)
I can't think of any smaller guys he cherry picked , but I'm sure you'll let me know if I've missed anyone.
-
Re: Golovkin v Alvarez rematch May 2018
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ron Swanson
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ron Swanson
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
GaMo
Knocking out Khan was funny and it added to both the bank account and the highlight reel. Not sure how knocking a guy cold makes you look bad... but if that’s the logic I’ve come to expect from this place. I honestly don’t care if Alvarez and Golovkin beat up Welterweights as every fighter takes a soft fight now and then. You can defend Golovkin for it but he’s the champion (apparently) he should be defending against people in his own division
Knocking out Khan was funny and it added to both the bank account and the highlight reel.
Agreed
Not sure how knocking a guy cold makes you look bad... but if that’s the logic I’ve come to expect from this place.
Well you're in luck as I'll explain it to you. The knockout doesn't make him look bad, the fact that they had to resort to not only fighting somebody 1 1/2 to 2 weights lower, but someone widely recognised as
A. Chinny
B. Feather fisted
C. Not in the top 10 of his own weight ffs. And
D. The closest thing to Lord Lucan in Boxing.
I honestly don’t care if Alvarez and Golovkin beat up Welterweights as every fighter takes a soft fight now and then.
Liar! You are forever digging out GGG for fighting Brook!
You can defend Golovkin for it but he’s the champion (apparently) he should be defending against people in his own division
See, you do care! Like I said, Golovkin wanted a fight, nobody wanted to fight him. He had to find a late replacement because your mate and his Dad bottled it (I notice you've chose to ignore that fact, because you have no answer as to why your little Bum boy superstar was scared as fuck!;D)
Golovkin has no previous for picking smaller guys , whereas Oscar constantly cherry picked smaller guys than Canelo for fights with his little "Caneloweight" matchups.
That little option has now been shut off as he won't be making less than 160 anytime soon.
So, the only catch weights he'll be doing are between 160 & 168. He's already done The obvious one in JCC Jr. so good luck with that. ;D
Love your post, but... GGG actually actually does have a sizable history of picking smaller guys.
Smaller guys than himself? With the exception of Brook and we know the story behind that , please name them.
Just look at all the guys from 154/147 and you’ll understand what I mean.
Also, I think people get caught thinking of size in limited ways. A person can hunch over and contract their traps/rhomboids/chest and make themselves shorter/narrower like GGG does or stick their chest out and high to make themselves appear as big as possible as most men will do.
I’m not saying GGG is huge, but he fought at 165 as a child. He’s not tiny. Most grow into their real size. He shrank into his real size. This suggests if he stops training he will get big fast. So not so small.
So, I asked a question and you took 3 paragraphs to avoid an answer.
As for "he fought at 165 as a child, etc.etc.
Andre Ward fought in the amateurs at LHW, fought most of his career at SMW, Bellew fought as an amateur at HW, fought most of his career at LHW.
Some guys when they move from amateur to pro go down a weight, because they are training much harder, eating better and consequently are leaner.
Some obviously go the other way it's just the way it is.
But anyway, apart from Brook, GGG bona fide MW's at the MW limit. Some even went up in weight as they were BIGGER than him (Murray for example.)
I can't think of any smaller guys he cherry picked , but I'm sure you'll let me know if I've missed anyone.
I answered, the 154/147 fighters he fought.
I’ll skip his early career and begin when he was of consequence
He got his first belt against Nunez who fought at 154 the previous fight so
Nunez
Tapia
Ouma
Proska
Rosado
Ishida
That’s 6 of his first 8 Middleweight title fights against guys either moving up or one who would then move down.
I’m not trying to bash GGG by saying this. I just want people to know the facts.
Like talking about Ward fighting at LHW in the amateurs, that’s misleading as hell. He fought almost all his amateur career at MW, I’m rather sure he literally never faught at LHW until the Olympic Qualifying and Olympics. He did that because he didn’t want to be drained. That’s how it works. In amateurs people fight near their real weight for tournaments. So we can assume at 19 years old GGGs natural weight was 165. He’s not so small. Think about it, for how long he’s talked about 154-168 he has only fought at 160. 160 is his weight.
Edit-just checked and in2001 and 2003 Ward won MW national championships. So yes, Olympic Qualifying and Olympics in 2004 is when Ward first fought as an amateur at LHW
-
Re: Golovkin v Alvarez rematch May 2018
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ron Swanson
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ron Swanson
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ron Swanson
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
GaMo
Knocking out Khan was funny and it added to both the bank account and the highlight reel. Not sure how knocking a guy cold makes you look bad... but if that’s the logic I’ve come to expect from this place. I honestly don’t care if Alvarez and Golovkin beat up Welterweights as every fighter takes a soft fight now and then. You can defend Golovkin for it but he’s the champion (apparently) he should be defending against people in his own division
Knocking out Khan was funny and it added to both the bank account and the highlight reel.
Agreed
Not sure how knocking a guy cold makes you look bad... but if that’s the logic I’ve come to expect from this place.
Well you're in luck as I'll explain it to you. The knockout doesn't make him look bad, the fact that they had to resort to not only fighting somebody 1 1/2 to 2 weights lower, but someone widely recognised as
A. Chinny
B. Feather fisted
C. Not in the top 10 of his own weight ffs. And
D. The closest thing to Lord Lucan in Boxing.
I honestly don’t care if Alvarez and Golovkin beat up Welterweights as every fighter takes a soft fight now and then.
Liar! You are forever digging out GGG for fighting Brook!
You can defend Golovkin for it but he’s the champion (apparently) he should be defending against people in his own division
See, you do care! Like I said, Golovkin wanted a fight, nobody wanted to fight him. He had to find a late replacement because your mate and his Dad bottled it (I notice you've chose to ignore that fact, because you have no answer as to why your little Bum boy superstar was scared as fuck!;D)
Golovkin has no previous for picking smaller guys , whereas Oscar constantly cherry picked smaller guys than Canelo for fights with his little "Caneloweight" matchups.
That little option has now been shut off as he won't be making less than 160 anytime soon.
So, the only catch weights he'll be doing are between 160 & 168. He's already done The obvious one in JCC Jr. so good luck with that. ;D
Love your post, but... GGG actually actually does have a sizable history of picking smaller guys.
Smaller guys than himself? With the exception of Brook and we know the story behind that , please name them.
Just look at all the guys from 154/147 and you’ll understand what I mean.
Also, I think people get caught thinking of size in limited ways. A person can hunch over and contract their traps/rhomboids/chest and make themselves shorter/narrower like GGG does or stick their chest out and high to make themselves appear as big as possible as most men will do.
I’m not saying GGG is huge, but he fought at 165 as a child. He’s not tiny. Most grow into their real size. He shrank into his real size. This suggests if he stops training he will get big fast. So not so small.
So, I asked a question and you took 3 paragraphs to avoid an answer.
As for "he fought at 165 as a child, etc.etc.
Andre Ward fought in the amateurs at LHW, fought most of his career at SMW, Bellew fought as an amateur at HW, fought most of his career at LHW.
Some guys when they move from amateur to pro go down a weight, because they are training much harder, eating better and consequently are leaner.
Some obviously go the other way it's just the way it is.
But anyway, apart from Brook, GGG bona fide MW's at the MW limit. Some even went up in weight as they were BIGGER than him (Murray for example.)
I can't think of any smaller guys he cherry picked , but I'm sure you'll let me know if I've missed anyone.
I answered, the 154/147 fighters he fought.
I’ll skip his early career and begin when he was of consequence
He got his first belt against Nunez who fought at 154 the previous fight so
Nunez
Tapia
Ouma
Proska
Rosado
Ishida
That’s 6 of his first 8 Middleweight title fights against guys either moving up or one who would then move down.
I’m not trying to bash GGG by saying this. I just want people to know the facts.
Like talking about Ward fighting at LHW in the amateurs, that’s misleading as hell. He fought almost all his amateur career at MW, I’m rather sure he literally never faught at LHW until the Olympic Qualifying and Olympics. He did that because he didn’t want to be drained. That’s how it works. In amateurs people fight near their real weight for tournaments. So we can assume at 19 years old GGGs natural weight was 165. He’s not so small. Think about it, for how long he’s talked about 154-168 he has only fought at 160. 160 is his weight.
Edit-just checked and in2001 and 2003 Ward won MW national championships. So yes, Olympic Qualifying and Olympics in 2004 is when Ward first fought as an amateur at LHW
I know you need to try to have a little dig at Golovkin where possible so here goes.
Nunez - yep, his previous fight was LMW, 2 fights later he was SMW and his last fight was at LHW. so what does all that bollocks mean ?
Tapia - He fought eliminators at MW to get a shot . He's gone. Up and down like a yo yo , fighters do.
Ouma - So Ouma fought mostly at LMW, but he had fought at MW before. The fact is these fights are for a WORLD TITLE at 160. He's not cherry picking, the opponents need to be approved to fight for a World title shot. It's not a catch weight or such bollocks.
Proska - come on, Proska was the reigning European champ at MW and a career MW. clutching at straws mate.
Rosado - Rosado is a bigger guy than GGG. Yeah he was a LMW, but he is a MW. And we all know Rosado will just go where the dough is.
Ishida - He was the reigning WBO MW champ! So if he previously was a LMW So what? Next you're gonna tell me Canelo is a LMW. Ps. Ishida's last pro fight was as a HW!
So you can mislead people as much as you like, but these were WORLD TITLE FIGHTS! These guys have to be authorised by the governing bodies.
Ironically, to finish . As an amateur GGG was probably fighting ABOVE his real weight against BIGGER GUYS, but I don't suppose he gets credit for that. is it not the same thing?
-
Re: Golovkin v Alvarez rematch May 2018
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ron Swanson
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ron Swanson
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ron Swanson
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
GaMo
Knocking out Khan was funny and it added to both the bank account and the highlight reel. Not sure how knocking a guy cold makes you look bad... but if that’s the logic I’ve come to expect from this place. I honestly don’t care if Alvarez and Golovkin beat up Welterweights as every fighter takes a soft fight now and then. You can defend Golovkin for it but he’s the champion (apparently) he should be defending against people in his own division
Knocking out Khan was funny and it added to both the bank account and the highlight reel.
Agreed
Not sure how knocking a guy cold makes you look bad... but if that’s the logic I’ve come to expect from this place.
Well you're in luck as I'll explain it to you. The knockout doesn't make him look bad, the fact that they had to resort to not only fighting somebody 1 1/2 to 2 weights lower, but someone widely recognised as
A. Chinny
B. Feather fisted
C. Not in the top 10 of his own weight ffs. And
D. The closest thing to Lord Lucan in Boxing.
I honestly don’t care if Alvarez and Golovkin beat up Welterweights as every fighter takes a soft fight now and then.
Liar! You are forever digging out GGG for fighting Brook!
You can defend Golovkin for it but he’s the champion (apparently) he should be defending against people in his own division
See, you do care! Like I said, Golovkin wanted a fight, nobody wanted to fight him. He had to find a late replacement because your mate and his Dad bottled it (I notice you've chose to ignore that fact, because you have no answer as to why your little Bum boy superstar was scared as fuck!;D)
Golovkin has no previous for picking smaller guys , whereas Oscar constantly cherry picked smaller guys than Canelo for fights with his little "Caneloweight" matchups.
That little option has now been shut off as he won't be making less than 160 anytime soon.
So, the only catch weights he'll be doing are between 160 & 168. He's already done The obvious one in JCC Jr. so good luck with that. ;D
Love your post, but... GGG actually actually does have a sizable history of picking smaller guys.
Smaller guys than himself? With the exception of Brook and we know the story behind that , please name them.
Just look at all the guys from 154/147 and you’ll understand what I mean.
Also, I think people get caught thinking of size in limited ways. A person can hunch over and contract their traps/rhomboids/chest and make themselves shorter/narrower like GGG does or stick their chest out and high to make themselves appear as big as possible as most men will do.
I’m not saying GGG is huge, but he fought at 165 as a child. He’s not tiny. Most grow into their real size. He shrank into his real size. This suggests if he stops training he will get big fast. So not so small.
So, I asked a question and you took 3 paragraphs to avoid an answer.
As for "he fought at 165 as a child, etc.etc.
Andre Ward fought in the amateurs at LHW, fought most of his career at SMW, Bellew fought as an amateur at HW, fought most of his career at LHW.
Some guys when they move from amateur to pro go down a weight, because they are training much harder, eating better and consequently are leaner.
Some obviously go the other way it's just the way it is.
But anyway, apart from Brook, GGG bona fide MW's at the MW limit. Some even went up in weight as they were BIGGER than him (Murray for example.)
I can't think of any smaller guys he cherry picked , but I'm sure you'll let me know if I've missed anyone.
I answered, the 154/147 fighters he fought.
I’ll skip his early career and begin when he was of consequence
He got his first belt against Nunez who fought at 154 the previous fight so
Nunez
Tapia
Ouma
Proska
Rosado
Ishida
That’s 6 of his first 8 Middleweight title fights against guys either moving up or one who would then move down.
I’m not trying to bash GGG by saying this. I just want people to know the facts.
Like talking about Ward fighting at LHW in the amateurs, that’s misleading as hell. He fought almost all his amateur career at MW, I’m rather sure he literally never faught at LHW until the Olympic Qualifying and Olympics. He did that because he didn’t want to be drained. That’s how it works. In amateurs people fight near their real weight for tournaments. So we can assume at 19 years old GGGs natural weight was 165. He’s not so small. Think about it, for how long he’s talked about 154-168 he has only fought at 160. 160 is his weight.
Edit-just checked and in2001 and 2003 Ward won MW national championships. So yes, Olympic Qualifying and Olympics in 2004 is when Ward first fought as an amateur at LHW
I know you need to try to have a little dig at Golovkin where possible so here goes.
Nunez - yep, his previous fight was LMW, 2 fights later he was SMW and his last fight was at LHW. so what does all that bollocks mean ?
Tapia - He fought eliminators at MW to get a shot . He's gone. Up and down like a yo yo , fighters do.
Ouma - So Ouma fought mostly at LMW, but he had fought at MW before. The fact is these fights are for a WORLD TITLE at 160. He's not cherry picking, the opponents need to be approved to fight for a World title shot. It's not a catch weight or such bollocks.
Proska - come on, Proska was the reigning European champ at MW and a career MW. clutching at straws mate.
Rosado - Rosado is a bigger guy than GGG. Yeah he was a LMW, but he is a MW. And we all know Rosado will just go where the dough is.
Ishida - He was the reigning WBO MW champ! So if he previously was a LMW So what? Next you're gonna tell me Canelo is a LMW. Ps. Ishida's last pro fight was as a HW!
So you can mislead people as much as you like, but these were WORLD TITLE FIGHTS! These guys have to be authorised by the governing bodies.
Ironically, to finish . As an amateur GGG was probably fighting ABOVE his real weight against BIGGER GUYS, but I don't suppose he gets credit for that. is it not the same thing?
Boxing fans have this thing where they see what they want to see.
You mention cherry picking, where did I say that? That wasn’t my point at all. All I said was he has fought smaller guys. I did not say smaller than him. I said smaller. As in they previously fought in smaller weight classes than him. You asked who, I listed some. I can list many more who fought in smaller weight classes but it defeats the point because the point was simply that he had. Not to have a dog, just to include the facts.
My main point is very simple. A guy that was a 165 pound fighter as an amateur and 160 pound fighter for
12 years as a professional is not a small middleweight. He’s just a middleweight. His entire career amateur and pro is Middleweight. He’s a middleweight. I don’t know what is inflammatory about that statement
-
Re: Golovkin v Alvarez rematch May 2018
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ron Swanson
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ron Swanson
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ron Swanson
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ron Swanson
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
GaMo
Knocking out Khan was funny and it added to both the bank account and the highlight reel. Not sure how knocking a guy cold makes you look bad... but if that’s the logic I’ve come to expect from this place. I honestly don’t care if Alvarez and Golovkin beat up Welterweights as every fighter takes a soft fight now and then. You can defend Golovkin for it but he’s the champion (apparently) he should be defending against people in his own division
Knocking out Khan was funny and it added to both the bank account and the highlight reel.
Agreed
Not sure how knocking a guy cold makes you look bad... but if that’s the logic I’ve come to expect from this place.
Well you're in luck as I'll explain it to you. The knockout doesn't make him look bad, the fact that they had to resort to not only fighting somebody 1 1/2 to 2 weights lower, but someone widely recognised as
A. Chinny
B. Feather fisted
C. Not in the top 10 of his own weight ffs. And
D. The closest thing to Lord Lucan in Boxing.
I honestly don’t care if Alvarez and Golovkin beat up Welterweights as every fighter takes a soft fight now and then.
Liar! You are forever digging out GGG for fighting Brook!
You can defend Golovkin for it but he’s the champion (apparently) he should be defending against people in his own division
See, you do care! Like I said, Golovkin wanted a fight, nobody wanted to fight him. He had to find a late replacement because your mate and his Dad bottled it (I notice you've chose to ignore that fact, because you have no answer as to why your little Bum boy superstar was scared as fuck!;D)
Golovkin has no previous for picking smaller guys , whereas Oscar constantly cherry picked smaller guys than Canelo for fights with his little "Caneloweight" matchups.
That little option has now been shut off as he won't be making less than 160 anytime soon.
So, the only catch weights he'll be doing are between 160 & 168. He's already done The obvious one in JCC Jr. so good luck with that. ;D
Love your post, but... GGG actually actually does have a sizable history of picking smaller guys.
Smaller guys than himself? With the exception of Brook and we know the story behind that , please name them.
Just look at all the guys from 154/147 and you’ll understand what I mean.
Also, I think people get caught thinking of size in limited ways. A person can hunch over and contract their traps/rhomboids/chest and make themselves shorter/narrower like GGG does or stick their chest out and high to make themselves appear as big as possible as most men will do.
I’m not saying GGG is huge, but he fought at 165 as a child. He’s not tiny. Most grow into their real size. He shrank into his real size. This suggests if he stops training he will get big fast. So not so small.
So, I asked a question and you took 3 paragraphs to avoid an answer.
As for "he fought at 165 as a child, etc.etc.
Andre Ward fought in the amateurs at LHW, fought most of his career at SMW, Bellew fought as an amateur at HW, fought most of his career at LHW.
Some guys when they move from amateur to pro go down a weight, because they are training much harder, eating better and consequently are leaner.
Some obviously go the other way it's just the way it is.
But anyway, apart from Brook, GGG bona fide MW's at the MW limit. Some even went up in weight as they were BIGGER than him (Murray for example.)
I can't think of any smaller guys he cherry picked , but I'm sure you'll let me know if I've missed anyone.
I answered, the 154/147 fighters he fought.
I’ll skip his early career and begin when he was of consequence
He got his first belt against Nunez who fought at 154 the previous fight so
Nunez
Tapia
Ouma
Proska
Rosado
Ishida
That’s 6 of his first 8 Middleweight title fights against guys either moving up or one who would then move down.
I’m not trying to bash GGG by saying this. I just want people to know the facts.
Like talking about Ward fighting at LHW in the amateurs, that’s misleading as hell. He fought almost all his amateur career at MW, I’m rather sure he literally never faught at LHW until the Olympic Qualifying and Olympics. He did that because he didn’t want to be drained. That’s how it works. In amateurs people fight near their real weight for tournaments. So we can assume at 19 years old GGGs natural weight was 165. He’s not so small. Think about it, for how long he’s talked about 154-168 he has only fought at 160. 160 is his weight.
Edit-just checked and in2001 and 2003 Ward won MW national championships. So yes, Olympic Qualifying and Olympics in 2004 is when Ward first fought as an amateur at LHW
I know you need to try to have a little dig at Golovkin where possible so here goes.
Nunez - yep, his previous fight was LMW, 2 fights later he was SMW and his last fight was at LHW. so what does all that bollocks mean ?
Tapia - He fought eliminators at MW to get a shot . He's gone. Up and down like a yo yo , fighters do.
Ouma - So Ouma fought mostly at LMW, but he had fought at MW before. The fact is these fights are for a WORLD TITLE at 160. He's not cherry picking, the opponents need to be approved to fight for a World title shot. It's not a catch weight or such bollocks.
Proska - come on, Proska was the reigning European champ at MW and a career MW. clutching at straws mate.
Rosado - Rosado is a bigger guy than GGG. Yeah he was a LMW, but he is a MW. And we all know Rosado will just go where the dough is.
Ishida - He was the reigning WBO MW champ! So if he previously was a LMW So what? Next you're gonna tell me Canelo is a LMW. Ps. Ishida's last pro fight was as a HW!
So you can mislead people as much as you like, but these were WORLD TITLE FIGHTS! These guys have to be authorised by the governing bodies.
Ironically, to finish . As an amateur GGG was probably fighting ABOVE his real weight against BIGGER GUYS, but I don't suppose he gets credit for that. is it not the same thing?
Boxing fans have this thing where they see what they want to see.
You mention cherry picking, where did I say that? That wasn’t my point at all. All I said was he has fought smaller guys. I did not say smaller than him. I said smaller. As in they previously fought in smaller weight classes than him. You asked who, I listed some. I can list many more who fought in smaller weight classes but it defeats the point because the point was simply that he had. Not to have a dog, just to include the facts.
My main point is very simple. A guy that was a 165 pound fighter as an amateur and 160 pound fighter for
12 years as a professional is not a small middleweight. He’s just a middleweight. His entire career amateur and pro is Middleweight. He’s a middleweight. I don’t know what is inflammatory about that statement
"You mention cherry picking, where did I say that?"
err actually right at the start. You said he has a "sizable history of picking smaller guys."
"All I said was he has fought smaller guys. I did not say smaller than him. I said smaller."
I think we'll leave it there.
I think YOU should give GGG Immense credit for fighting bigger guys than him through his amateur career, cos he was clearly a small 165! :cool:
-
Re: Golovkin v Alvarez rematch May 2018
And he did pick smaller guys. It’s not inflammatory if it’s true. Far different to say pick and say cherry pick.
As for giving him credit for fighting bigger guys as an amateur....I gave him huge credit for years. If IamInuit was still(RIP) around he could vouch that on another site before he was even champ I was telling people that GGG was the best in the world.
I hold a grudge against him because I thought so highly of him and wanted to see him challenge greatness. I’m open about that. But I darn well respect the Jacobs fight, and I understand him chasing the dollar. If he fights Jacobs again I will let my bias go.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ron Swanson
And he did pick smaller guys. It’s not inflammatory if it’s true. Far different to say pick and say cherry pick.
As for giving him credit for fighting bigger guys as an amateur....I gave him huge credit for years. If IamInuit was still(RIP) around he could vouch that on another site before he was even champ I was telling people that GGG was the best in the world.
I hold a grudge against him because I thought so highly of him and wanted to see him challenge greatness. I’m open about that. But I darn well respect the Jacobs fight, and I understand him chasing the dollar. If he fights Jacobs again I will let my bias go.
Come on Ron, the reason I'm not letting this go is because you're better than this. Twisting words to try to squirm out of a rash statement.
"I said pick not cherry pick" and "I said smaller guys, not smaller than him". What does all that mean.
All the guys you mentioned were over 5 years ago and I don't think HE had the political power at the time to "pick" who he fights.
Come on man, like I said, you're bettter than this.
-
Re: Golovkin v Alvarez rematch May 2018
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ron Swanson
And he did pick smaller guys. It’s not inflammatory if it’s true. Far different to say pick and say cherry pick.
As for giving him credit for fighting bigger guys as an amateur....I gave him huge credit for years. If IamInuit was still(RIP) around he could vouch that on another site before he was even champ I was telling people that GGG was the best in the world.
I hold a grudge against him because I thought so highly of him and wanted to see him challenge greatness. I’m open about that. But I darn well respect the Jacobs fight, and I understand him chasing the dollar. If he fights Jacobs again I will let my bias go.
Come on Ron, the reason I'm not letting this go is because you're better than this. Twisting words to try to squirm out of a rash statement.
"I said pick not cherry pick" and "I said smaller guys, not smaller than him". What does all that mean.
All the guys you mentioned were over 5 years ago and I don't think HE had the political power at the time to "pick" who he fights.
Come on man, like I said, you're bettter than this.
I’m not twisting anything, you are. You said Cherry picking, not me. You know there is a very big difference between cherry picking and picking. Everyone picks an opponent to fight, that’s a fact. Otherwise there would be no fights. Cherry picking implies someone is “who is the weak guy I can find?”. There is a very clear difference. I don’t know why you are pretending saying someone picks opponents is an insult. It’s a fact and not an insult in any way. This is how far GGG defense has come? We can’t even say he picks opponents? It’s f’n madness. You are twisting words.
And smaller guys are guys from smaller divisions. This is not complex. Again, WTF is going on with this I don’t understand or “what does this mean?” It’s quite clear. I even said it. And why, because there are lots of ways to look at size. For example many go by reach, but Floyd’s reach is greater than GGG. Doesn’t mean he’s bigger. Many go by weight they fight at. But Vinny Pazienza got on gear and fought Roy Jones, doesn’t change he was really a lightweight.
So keep it simple, a guy that fought his entire career, pro and amateur in one division, his size is that division.
This is not in the least bit confusing so stop trolling. You’re better than this.
Even “these opponents are all 5 years in the past”, umm, obviously. This conversation began at you saying GGG doesn’t have a history of picking smaller opponents. I simply pointed out that fact that he does, history, by definition is in the past. I’m not squirming at all on this. The facts support what I said.
-
Re: Golovkin v Alvarez rematch May 2018
Don't see how I'm Trolling though, but hey, keep believing yourself.
LATEST FAKE NEWS!
1.Carl Frampton accused of Cherry picking small opponents! not smaller than himself, just small! Frampton replied, "uh, yeah, that's because I am small! and Cherries were nothing to do with it! :rolleyes:
-
Re: Golovkin v Alvarez rematch May 2018
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Don't see how I'm Trolling though, but hey, keep believing yourself.
That’s just the classic comeback here when somebody is losing an argument. Basically he’s admitting he has no intelligent response and you won the debate.
-
Re: Golovkin v Alvarez rematch May 2018
Looks like Canelo has agreed to the rematch.
-
Re: Golovkin v Alvarez rematch May 2018
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Alpha
Looks like Canelo has agreed to the rematch.
Canelo would look like an even bigger pussy than he did the first time when he refused to fight Canelo citing all the excuses under the sun.
-
Re: Golovkin v Alvarez rematch May 2018
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Alpha
Looks like Canelo has agreed to the rematch.
Canelo would look like an even bigger pussy than he did the first time when he refused to fight Canelo citing all the excuses under the sun.
Apparently no rematch clause this time.
-
Re: Golovkin v Alvarez rematch May 2018
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Alpha
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Alpha
Looks like Canelo has agreed to the rematch.
Canelo would look like an even bigger pussy than he did the first time when he refused to fight Canelo citing all the excuses under the sun.
Apparently no rematch clause this time.
Hopefully will not need one and as Rocky infamously said "Don't want one!"
-
Re: Golovkin v Alvarez rematch May 2018
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Alpha
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Alpha
Looks like Canelo has agreed to the rematch.
Canelo would look like an even bigger pussy than he did the first time when he refused to fight Canelo citing all the excuses under the sun.
Apparently no rematch clause this time.
Thank fuck for that! am I the only person bored with these 2 holding the division to ransom?
-
Re: Golovkin v Alvarez rematch May 2018
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Alpha
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Alpha
Looks like Canelo has agreed to the rematch.
Canelo would look like an even bigger pussy than he did the first time when he refused to fight Canelo citing all the excuses under the sun.
Apparently no rematch clause this time.
Thank fuck for that! am I the only person bored with these 2 holding the division to ransom?
Triple G is not holding up the division. Canelo has been the one jumping up and down the division avoiding the fight.
-
Re: Golovkin v Alvarez rematch May 2018
I really don't like GGG being inactive like this at his age. He really should have had a stay busy fight inbetween. GGG can only decline (which appears to have been happening a bit), Canelo on the other hand can only get better. Will be supporting GGG, but you have to get nervous when a fighter slows in the mid-30's.
-
Re: Golovkin v Alvarez rematch May 2018
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Alpha
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Alpha
Looks like Canelo has agreed to the rematch.
Canelo would look like an even bigger pussy than he did the first time when he refused to fight Canelo citing all the excuses under the sun.
Apparently no rematch clause this time.
Thank fuck for that! am I the only person bored with these 2 holding the division to ransom?
Triple G is not holding up the division. Canelo has been the one jumping up and down the division avoiding the fight.
He's just as much to blame. At this stage of his career he wanted to fight more regularly, but he's begging for Canelo and pandering to his and GBP's every whim! After the first fight, if he didn't get the rematch in 3-4 months to suit him, he should've said "fuck you, I beat you anyway.im gonna wipe out the rest of the division."
That's if he still truly believes in himself?
If enough don't entertain ODLH's bullshit, he would either run out of opponents or have to toe the line.
-
Re: Golovkin v Alvarez rematch May 2018
Boxrec has GGG having beat 1 of top 8 MWs, Daniel Jacobs, and that win is very very disputable. His chasing that Canelo $$$ has stopped any notion of cleaning out the division.
-
Re: Golovkin v Alvarez rematch May 2018
I don’t necessarily mind the rematch but there are really good fights at MW for each of them. I have a feeling that both will take an easy fight after this one though.
-
Re: Golovkin v Alvarez rematch May 2018
The other contenders should be fighting each other to establish a pecking order while these two are tied up. Jacobs and Charlo should be fighting each other if neither is willing to travel to the UK next to fight Saunders. Or involve Derevyanchenko, Murata, Andrade. Everyone seems available, there's no reason that Centeno should be mentioned when these guys are all basicall available. Andrade already turned down Derevyanchenko for last December stating it wasn't enough time to prepare. Derevyanchenko had no issues.
-
Re: Golovkin v Alvarez rematch May 2018
The thing is that I feel like the other top guys in the division are willing to fight the best.
-
Re: Golovkin v Alvarez rematch May 2018
Quote:
Originally Posted by
powerpuncher
The thing is that I feel like the other top guys in the division are willing to fight the best.
The all want the spoils that come with the Canelo/ GGG winner. Until then we may see a lot of treading water.
-
Re: Golovkin v Alvarez rematch May 2018
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ron Swanson
Boxrec has GGG having beat 1 of top 8 MWs, Daniel Jacobs, and that win is very very disputable. His chasing that Canelo $$$ has stopped any notion of cleaning out the division.
That's one more than the other 7 combined have beat.
In the past year, between Jacobs, Charlo and Andrade they've faced Arias, Heiland and Fox. A round robin to find the best American would make sense. Unfortunately they'd rather chase $$$ then proving who is top dog.
-
Re: Golovkin v Alvarez rematch May 2018
Charlo has always shown that he is willing to fight the best. He is just taking whoever will fight him. Jacobs has generally fought whoever they put in front of him. I don’t recall him ducking anyone. Andrade is fair game. He has avoided some fights but is he a MW? BJS had a huge win but has been invisible for a while before that. We will see if he steps up and fights the top fighters in the division.
GGG was kind of waiting around for the Canelo fight but at least he was active. He did also fight Jacobs who was the best fighter he could fight at the time. Canelo completely ducked every other MW in the division and I doubt he fights anybody dangerous after fighting GGG again.
-
Re: Golovkin v Alvarez rematch May 2018
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fenster
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ron Swanson
Boxrec has GGG having beat 1 of top 8 MWs, Daniel Jacobs, and that win is very very disputable. His chasing that Canelo $$$ has stopped any notion of cleaning out the division.
That's one more than the other 7 combined have beat.
In the past year, between Jacobs, Charlo and Andrade they've faced Arias, Heiland and Fox. A round robin to find the best American would make sense. Unfortunately they'd rather chase $$$ then proving who is top dog.
Blaming the top contenders for the top guys not fighting them? I guess protect the white guys any way possible eh Fenster?
It’s Jacobs fault GGG, Lemieux and BJS all refused to even negotiate with him?
It’s Charlo’s fault GGG said he will never fight him even though he is his mandatory unless he is forced and even then it will be put off as long as possible(technically his trainer said)
How convenient for all the white guys they can refuse to fight the black guys and the black guys get blamed for it. And you suggest they should fight each other. Miss 1900 much?
-
Re: Golovkin v Alvarez rematch May 2018
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ron Swanson
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fenster
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ron Swanson
Boxrec has GGG having beat 1 of top 8 MWs, Daniel Jacobs, and that win is very very disputable. His chasing that Canelo $$$ has stopped any notion of cleaning out the division.
That's one more than the other 7 combined have beat.
In the past year, between Jacobs, Charlo and Andrade they've faced Arias, Heiland and Fox. A round robin to find the best American would make sense. Unfortunately they'd rather chase $$$ then proving who is top dog.
Blaming the top contenders for the top guys not fighting them? I guess protect the white guys any way possible eh Fenster?
It’s Jacobs fault GGG, Lemieux and BJS all refused to even negotiate with him?
It’s Charlo’s fault GGG said he will never fight him even though he is his mandatory unless he is forced and even then it will be put off as long as possible(technically his trainer said)
How convenient for all the white guys they can refuse to fight the black guys and the black guys get blamed for it. And you suggest they should fight each other. Miss 1900 much?
Ronnie you really are funny. Why even bring race into it? GGG has fought and beat Jacobs in case you forget. How many times do you want him to fight him? Until Jacobs wins.
-
Re: Golovkin v Alvarez rematch May 2018
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ron Swanson
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fenster
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ron Swanson
Boxrec has GGG having beat 1 of top 8 MWs, Daniel Jacobs, and that win is very very disputable. His chasing that Canelo $$$ has stopped any notion of cleaning out the division.
That's one more than the other 7 combined have beat.
In the past year, between Jacobs, Charlo and Andrade they've faced Arias, Heiland and Fox. A round robin to find the best American would make sense. Unfortunately they'd rather chase $$$ then proving who is top dog.
Blaming the top contenders for the top guys not fighting them? I guess protect the white guys any way possible eh Fenster?
It’s Jacobs fault GGG, Lemieux and BJS all refused to even negotiate with him?
It’s Charlo’s fault GGG said he will never fight him even though he is his mandatory unless he is forced and even then it will be put off as long as possible(technically his trainer said)
How convenient for all the white guys they can refuse to fight the black guys and the black guys get blamed for it. And you suggest they should fight each other. Miss 1900 much?
Ronnie you really are funny. Why even bring race into it? GGG has fought and beat Jacobs in case you forget. How many times do you want him to fight him? Until Jacobs wins.
Derevyanchenko's available.
-
Re: Golovkin v Alvarez rematch May 2018
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ron Swanson
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fenster
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ron Swanson
Boxrec has GGG having beat 1 of top 8 MWs, Daniel Jacobs, and that win is very very disputable. His chasing that Canelo $$$ has stopped any notion of cleaning out the division.
That's one more than the other 7 combined have beat.
In the past year, between Jacobs, Charlo and Andrade they've faced Arias, Heiland and Fox. A round robin to find the best American would make sense. Unfortunately they'd rather chase $$$ then proving who is top dog.
Blaming the top contenders for the top guys not fighting them? I guess protect the white guys any way possible eh Fenster?
It’s Jacobs fault GGG, Lemieux and BJS all refused to even negotiate with him?
It’s Charlo’s fault GGG said he will never fight him even though he is his mandatory unless he is forced and even then it will be put off as long as possible(technically his trainer said)
How convenient for all the white guys they can refuse to fight the black guys and the black guys get blamed for it. And you suggest they should fight each other. Miss 1900 much?
Err.. what? White men? Black men?
I named the three Americans from the top eight, race/colour had nothing to do with it (l'll easily prove why). Quite frankly i'm astonished (like, really, really, really shocked) anyone would see skin colour where nationality is the obvious factor.
Simply swap the three Americans for the other three in the top eight - Murata (Japan), Saunders (England) and Derevyanchenko (Ukraine). Now read the sentence again, the EXACT, EXACT same intention applies with an Asian, Eastern European and Gypsy. I merely used the Americans as it's utterly ridiculous that world-class fighters from the same country avoid each other, let alone those separated by oceans.
