http://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfor...tid=4596&stc=1
Printable View
The Twain quote I posted is accredited to him, although there is no proof he made it (like I say, much of our history has anomalies), doesn't detract from the truth of the quote tho.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/techn...id=mailsignout
"Rare Lunar Eclipse Will Be Last Until 2021"
The article failed to mention that if you want to see it again before 2021 you have to go to the underside surface of the Earth.
That's Mark Sargent, part of the Flat Earth Society, that I have already mentioned before, are part of the mis information side.
Here is a analysis of that interview from an actual flat earther:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LVi1fl9kCe8
They will never let actors like DeGrasse Tyson or Nye, debate a guy like Del or Eric, because they will be destroyed with facts and actual real natural science!
That guy is funny in the video.
Again, if you want to believe hearsay, pictures and video, then all power to you. I prefer actual science. You know, natural science, that uses empirical evidence to prove things.
But again, if you want to believe water can conform to the exterior of a shape, when you know that's impossible in our reality, and again, something you have never seen, and are able to prove yourself, doesn't happen in our reality, then all power to you. You believe in God without any empirical evidence, so you have already shown that you are susceptible to deception. But I hope you realize that is also only a belief, and not a proven fact as well.
Pretty cool to see someone waking up, he's almost there:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CR7uvlPfiNU&t=0s&list=WL&index=5
He has been at it for a long time, if you watch his street activism and talking with people that understand the sciences he is always respectful. But trolls are constantly try to snipe FE live streams, porn sniping so channels will get community strikes and so forth, it is so funny to us, we never go on globe channels live streams, but they will constantly troll FE channels, and because they have no argument for facts, they just do immature things.
His mate Gav, I think his channel is vortexpuppy (or something like that), is brilliant.
Planet Earth is alive. Deep beneath its skin, its life blood â rivers of molten iron â pulse around its core. And this mobile iron is what generates the magnetic field that causes auroras â and keeps us alive.
But, according to the science journal Nature, something strange is going on deep down below.
Itâs causing the magnetic North Pole to âskitterâ away from Canada, towards Siberia.
âThe magnetic pole is moving so quickly that it has forced the worldâs geomagnetism experts into a rare move,â Nature reports.
https://www.news.com.au/technology/s...38836c6097be9d
Strange things happen. Just because they canât be repeated, observed and or fully explained does not make them null. Some scientist say they can create life in a testube but that is in a lab in an already created earth with billions of living creatures. We canât duplicate no gravity on earth, but it exists unless you deny space flight etc. Iâm not into blind acceptance. We might be able to duplicate the Grand Canyon in a controlled area with a shitload of water of a few million or hundreds of millions years. Anyway wtf do I know I guess it doesnât really matter
I was replying to Tito, but that statement remains true. I myself believe in a creator (Not the God of the bible tho), but it is only a belief, as there is no empirical evidence. I do not claim it to be a fact of our reality. As I would hope everyone would understand the difference between facts and belief.
I was waiting for this, we have already had a drop of water, so it was bound to show up sooner or later. I post this one for you's, so you don't waste my time any further:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HYc5ibGNkMg
And this is water running down.
Firstly, neither is water conforming to the exterior of a shape like it would need to on a globe, secondly, doesn't look like any ball earth model I've ever seen, thirdly, are we claiming the substances are the same as they are on a ball earth?
I figure it's pointing North?
So no matter where you are on Earth, a compass will always point................. toward the middle? I see...
Where exactly would that middle be? Because Flat Earthers must have their own map from which the er..... "middle"..... should be well identified and its location well known.
Where would this middle be?
While we're at it, Round Earthers explain night and day by stating that the sun is always shining on half of the Earth, while the other half is in nighttime darkness. Easy enough to explain with a globe but.......... how does that work with a flat Earth? I mean, if the sun hides from a flat Earth, it hides for everybody, right? Even if low on the horizon or off at an angle, it would still cast sunshine on that part of the planet. So...... if the Earth is flat (which I'm not questioning anymore ;D )..... then how does the sun hide from some parts and not others? How is it that when it's daylight in the U.S., it's nighttime in China?
I'd love to stay and chat...... but the Colts-Chiefs are getting ready to start. ;D
So you had to remove my link and post a video I never even posted to refute a point I never made? ;D Adhesion mate. Even without mass, scale and gravity, you suggesting surface tension etc, and the adhesive qualities of water we see every day, in raindrops hanging of objects and on windscreens, utterly demolishing your idea that water not only can not cling to anything, but always has to conform to the shape of a flat tray when that is demonstrably not true. That is even discounting the reality of gravity being so important that is not only accounts for the seas being pulled down into an uberdense center and adhering to the surface of the spherical earth but for the actual shape of our global earth.
Does a compass not always point north? I've never been to the north pole, as I'm sure you never have either. But when you get there, with your exploring, pull out a compass for us to see, and also show the star trails, so we can prove where you are. Not some military designer Global positioning system.
Research perspective, we can only see so far, even using tools like a telescope etc. So as things get further away that go out of sight to a vanishing point. Like railway tracks, or light poles, they disappear from the observer at a vanishing point.
Good questions, but you still haven't presented 1 piece of empirical evidence of your spinning ball earth. And are even avoiding the fact that the surface of water will always be flat after finding it's level. Look into how canals are built, railway tracks.
I'm happy to answer questions, but it's better it you research it and understand it yourself, rather than me telling you. Just try proving a spinning ball earth to yourself. Forget theories and what you have seen in images or video, use actual Natural science, stuff you can demonstrate to yourself, test and repeat, we are talking reality, so it should be easy to prove in our reality right?
No I had to remove your link as it wouldn't let me post my vid in the reply, because it only allows 1 vid per post.
Yes we know how adhesion and meniscus works. It's not water conforming (not clinging or sticking) to the exterior of a shape.
Both theories of gravity have never been proven, and are not empirical evidence.
You realize I'm not even arguing anymore, right? ;D
The Earth is flat..... the astronauts are part of a conspiracy..... the Sun hides from part of the world and not others, at different times, moving in mysterious ways..... the world doesn't hurtle through space, it's poised on some space pedestal thingy.
Dying for the game to start though. It's daytime in Kansas City.
So we're back to the Earth hurtling through space? Because if it's not suspended or held up somehow, it must be hurtling through space.
Oh.... wait. You just said on the other thread that space is fake.
So if it's not hurtling, not suspended, not propped up by the pedestal thingy...... then how exactly is this giant flat disk propped up in the general universe?
Not that I really want to know, mind you. I'm just making conversation at this point.
Any empirical evidence of this universe you speak of?
Yes. I saw the universe firsthand. I'd post photos, but my dog ate my cellphone.
I was watching Ranulph Fiennes video and he did a Transglobe Expedition where he did the journey in the most difficult way which was crossing both poles. He lost the tips of his fingers due to frostbite. He would say the world is round.
Come on Master, you can do better than that, a Freemason?
Take a look at this video from about the 7:50 mark:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OlBlECsW_Bk
Freemason? ;D
Surely you are joking now? Go down to your local Freemason Hall and ask them to explain what they do. You are just coming up with excuse to have rubbish drip fed to you instead of making any effort to find things out for yourself. Using conspiracies to avoid the difficult questions is a cop out and you know it.
It is very easy for you to sit on your arse and mock the achievements of others because you set the lowest possible bar and then dismiss anything that contradicts your world view. You have the chap in your video moaning about their not being any photographs when you have already said that you do not accept photographs or video as evidence. Then you go and post videos ;D as evidence. Where is the motive for everybody who had navigated the globe, went to space, conducted experiments to all lie about the earth being a sphere? It is not there. You are pretending that people like Ellen Mcarthur, her team and everyone connected with her, are all colluding in pretending to sail single handedly around the earth when in fact she did what exactly? and why?
I have said star trails and pulling out a compass, did you see any of that? I would accept a live unedited stream of that.
I posted the vid so Master was aware of the person he was presenting, and how hilariously fake it was. I still laugh when I see it ;D
Still waiting on empirical evidence of your spinning ball earth :-X