-
Re: the scam is over. what's next?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
the plandemic has run it's course. it has been stretched as far as it possibly could. your liberties & freedoms are being chipped away bit by bit. so be ready for the next one. so what is the next crisis that is coming up? some sort of orchestrated war between two main forces? or even staged weather crisis? aliens? space war or accident, food shortage, take your pick. i'm picking a weather manipulation climate crisis. more tsunami's, earthquakes, wild fires, floods, hurricanes, tornado's. i doubt these so called natural disasters will be natural. the current scam is crumbling & there must be a change of course & it is probably being done already & will probably ramp up, intentionally, on purpose, to create more chaos, more crisis, more disorder, because that's how people are controlled
So what you gonna do about it kid? You’re the one with all the knowledge, give us your masterplan.
where did i say i had all the knowledge & a masterplan?
You never. You just whinged and moaned and moaned and whinged. But if you don’t have any knowledge or a masterplan, why even bother starting a thread?
Why start a thread about something you, by your own admission don’t have any knowledge on the subject ?
are you ok? you seem to be making things up which is unusual for you. usually you & i can discuss things based on what each of says. i never whinged & moaned & whinged & moaned. i just mentioned that freedoms & liberties are being whittled away. advised preparation. asked what the next crisis could be. gave some possible suggestions. gave my prediction & ideas. is there something wrong with making predictions? i never said i don't have any knowledge or any plans. i started the thread to see other opinions on the next possible crisis. i never admitted i don't have any knowledge on the subject. just refuted your statement that claimed i had all the knowledge. i do have plans, i wouldn't call them master plans. depending where they discussion goes i may share some of those ideas
I’m good thanks, appreciate you asking though. You didn’t say that you didn’t have any knowledge , but you didn’t say you did?
Infact , you said a lot without saying much at all, which is one of your strong pints.
However, if one Protesteth sufficiently to say “I never said I had any knowledge” I legitimately came to the conclusion that you didn’t have any knowledge. Otherwise why protest so vehemently?
Now if everybody used your technique for debating, where would we be?
“I didn’t say I didn’t believe in Covid” “I didn’t say I did believe in Covid.”
“I didn’t say you can catch this through the air” “I didn’t say you can’t catch this through the air”
I get the feeling you don’t know if you’re Arthur or Martha!
you claimed i whinged & moaned & whinged & moaned. i disagree with you. you said i had all the knowledge. no one has all the knowledge so i corrected you. by my correcting you on your use of the word all you went on to assume that meant i didn't have any knowledge or plans. you then lied & said i admitted i don't have any knowledge & you are mis-quoting me. where did i say "i never said i had any knowledge".
i am just interested in honest discussion.
Come on now, this is too much!!! ;D:rotflmao:
you have been the one lying in this thread
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IobNcpiwpSc
you are just not capable of having an honest conversation based on what you know, have verified & proven for yourself to be true
You “BELIEVE” that to be the case, but how do you “KNOW” that’s the truth?
you have already proved it to be true by bringing red herrings & fallacies to some of our discussions. you have even recently started to lie & mis represent what i have said
You believe that I lied (I never btw.) you believe I brought red herrings and fallacies to our discussions, they weren’t. Buy you don’t know any of that to be true.
you did lie & i already pointed it out. you said i admitted i don't have any knowledge. that is a lie. you also put in quotes “I never said I had any knowledge” as if i had said that. another lie. you also used red herrings about cancer & global warming, when my questions are on covid. red herring distractions to take away from my question. not really hard yakka to highlight your dishonesty
-
Re: the scam is over. what's next?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanz
There is nothing wrong with doubt, but there is a huge difference between skeptical doubt and contrarian doubt. TIC what you seem to think is skeptical doubt is really you just being contrarian. We all have expressed skeptical doubt about your claims, especailly the idea the Covid is fake because of the lack of credible evidence you have presented compared to the extraordinariness of your claim. You have presented nothing. No evidence. All you have is a belief in the face of mountains of evidence. All you have done and continue to do here is exhibit contrarian doubt. You are not even aware of how your motivation and desire to want your unfounded belief to be true has caused you to dismiss sound evidence as though it were suspect.
spergy larry you have been asked several times to provide proof on ow you know your belief is true. you have still been unable to. you are too retarded to understand that you only hold a belief. your belief requires faith in authority
I am not sure what kind of an education you have had but there seem to be a few very basic fundamentals you are missing. It is much easier to educate yourself now and avail yourself of some amazing help from more qualified people to help you make better decisions and more informed choices. I suggest you might want to start there before trying to remotely assess others.
It is not my belief that Covid exists that is a widely accepted scientific truth. Even discounting my own personal anecdotal experience of Covid and that of those around me it is now impossible to ignore the FACT that experts who have a more accurate insight than you or i, after having trained, practiced and studied viruses for years have agreed on these facts.
Your insisting that it is merely a belief does not make it so.
You are quite clearly governed by naive paranoia, unable or unwilling to accept your own limits and potential. That is why you are pretending that your fairy tale learned belief negates true knowledge. You don't even understand the argument from authority fallacy you are accusing people of invoking by relying on knowledge rather then believing your mythical gobbledeegook. You seem to think that because our opinions agree with the authority that is scientific concensus, then we can not be thinking critically. Actually the opposite is true.
If we ( the majority here who disagree with your assertion that covid is not real) were to argue that Covid must exist simply because the experts say so, then yes correctly you could point out that is a logical fallacy based on an argument from authority. The thing is though nobody here is making that argument. Rather what everyone is doing is arguing that these huge amounts of experts have accumulated a wealth of evidence, and that their conclusions have been reviewed and verified by another huge amount of experts, and so their conclusions are currently the best explanations.
You are making an argument from false expertise. You have shown quite clearly that you struggle to compose a sentence, let alone construct an argument, and so we have to assume there is no way any of us could trust you to conduct even the most rudimentary experiment.
Your are conflating your own weak ill thought out opinion with fact. Your laymans opinion does not negate the scientific concensus of experts. History and experience has taught us all this again and again.
Experts are not infallible and experts can of course be questioned that is what makes the scientific method a much better example of knowing something than your proposed lone experiment by a non-expert, that would be merely anecdotal and amount to something far closer to belief than knowing anything.
You disagreeing with the experts is not an example of skeptical doubt because the strength and volume of evidence needed to overturn this knowledge would be massive and you have as of yet provided nothing that would alter, discount or overturn it.
You have nothing more than contrarian doubt.
-
Re: the scam is over. what's next?
My dear trusted friend @TIC I have this very good opportunity for us both to wet our beaks.
The reason I have contacted you on this post is because I have researched you very carefully, and I know you are a person of the highest integrity and standing in this community. You are a man of science and questioning intellect. You have over many posts here (which means you are fully known and respected throughout the highest circles of influence). I have made dis offer before on this forum, but the person was a fool and a donkey and did not wish to become rich.
My real name is Adesanjo Odebasi, and I believe that it is very important, at this crucial time, to be totally open and honest with you - my brother and partner in business so that we may proceed in a trusting and family way with this business transaction I will propose to you, O my brother.
I am the eldest son of His Excellency Doctor Professor Goodluck Alwaysplayfair Odebasi NCG, KRNA, BCG. My father is de Minister of Energy for Nigeria and also the OPEC delegate for the west of Africa. You may use your esteemed sources to verify this information and to satisfy yourself of my credentials and my bona fide intentions towards you, my uncle and business friend.
My Fatha, he has recently transacted an agreement with Gazprom of Russia and wid de National Oil Corporation of China in Nigeria, my contry.
Currently, we have USD10,750,250 in our Bank Account 334563278 in the Nigerian National Bank, Lagos, Nigeria as a result of this legal and good faith transaction.
My father, the respected Minister wishes to move dese monies outside our contry so that we may be advantageous of Foreign Exchange benefits in international market liquidity.
Now, my good fren, you may know that it is not possible to transact foreign currency exchange in Nigeria, so I would be honoured to enter into a partnership with you to expedite dis legal business transaction wid you.
I have been totally honest with you. My fadda, he wishes to deposit de while sum of USD10,750,250 (ten million, seven hondred fiddy tousand and two hondred fiddy dollars)into your bank Account. My private banker, Mr Olajide Adewole (President of de Nigeria National Bank, will provide you wid de appropriate references and guarantees and you may reach him on ola.officialbankpresident@hotmail.com to satisfy your good self of our credentials
Our proposition is this. We will immediately deposit de monies into your account within 24 hours. In return for dis, you will receive de sum of one million (1,000,000)US dollars as a transaction fee. As you can see, I know I can trust you with dis proposal. Immediately thereafter, we will withdraw de balance of USD 9,750,250 from your account. You will therefore retain de balance of USD One Million for your professional and legal services in dis matter.
I wish that you, as a serious and clever man would then transact dese money to our home and private account
All day we need to start this transaction is information regarding our official transfer of de money. If you, my esteemed partner will simply send me de details of your account, I will immediately take dis action
Wonce you send me dis information - account name, number and location, we will act in a trusting way wid you so you gets your money straightaway
It will be gud to trasaxt de bidness wid you so yu can be verrrrry rich and a man abot town. it will be ezy for us to do dis ting as i am not a 101 man like som peeople on herr.
I Lloyd forward to herring from you
Professor Adesanjo Odebasi PhD
Executive Assistant to GA Odebasi VCR, KPMG
Highest Cultural Attaché
Nigerian Rich Oil Republic
His Excellency
-
Re: the scam is over. what's next?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
the plandemic has run it's course. it has been stretched as far as it possibly could. your liberties & freedoms are being chipped away bit by bit. so be ready for the next one. so what is the next crisis that is coming up? some sort of orchestrated war between two main forces? or even staged weather crisis? aliens? space war or accident, food shortage, take your pick. i'm picking a weather manipulation climate crisis. more tsunami's, earthquakes, wild fires, floods, hurricanes, tornado's. i doubt these so called natural disasters will be natural. the current scam is crumbling & there must be a change of course & it is probably being done already & will probably ramp up, intentionally, on purpose, to create more chaos, more crisis, more disorder, because that's how people are controlled
So what you gonna do about it kid? You’re the one with all the knowledge, give us your masterplan.
where did i say i had all the knowledge & a masterplan?
You never. You just whinged and moaned and moaned and whinged. But if you don’t have any knowledge or a masterplan, why even bother starting a thread?
Why start a thread about something you, by your own admission don’t have any knowledge on the subject ?
are you ok? you seem to be making things up which is unusual for you. usually you & i can discuss things based on what each of says. i never whinged & moaned & whinged & moaned. i just mentioned that freedoms & liberties are being whittled away. advised preparation. asked what the next crisis could be. gave some possible suggestions. gave my prediction & ideas. is there something wrong with making predictions? i never said i don't have any knowledge or any plans. i started the thread to see other opinions on the next possible crisis. i never admitted i don't have any knowledge on the subject. just refuted your statement that claimed i had all the knowledge. i do have plans, i wouldn't call them master plans. depending where they discussion goes i may share some of those ideas
I’m good thanks, appreciate you asking though. You didn’t say that you didn’t have any knowledge , but you didn’t say you did?
Infact , you said a lot without saying much at all, which is one of your strong pints.
However, if one Protesteth sufficiently to say “I never said I had any knowledge” I legitimately came to the conclusion that you didn’t have any knowledge. Otherwise why protest so vehemently?
Now if everybody used your technique for debating, where would we be?
“I didn’t say I didn’t believe in Covid” “I didn’t say I did believe in Covid.”
“I didn’t say you can catch this through the air” “I didn’t say you can’t catch this through the air”
I get the feeling you don’t know if you’re Arthur or Martha!
you claimed i whinged & moaned & whinged & moaned. i disagree with you. you said i had all the knowledge. no one has all the knowledge so i corrected you. by my correcting you on your use of the word all you went on to assume that meant i didn't have any knowledge or plans. you then lied & said i admitted i don't have any knowledge & you are mis-quoting me. where did i say "i never said i had any knowledge".
i am just interested in honest discussion.
Come on now, this is too much!!! ;D:rotflmao:
you have been the one lying in this thread
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IobNcpiwpSc
you are just not capable of having an honest conversation based on what you know, have verified & proven for yourself to be true
You “BELIEVE” that to be the case, but how do you “KNOW” that’s the truth?
you have already proved it to be true by bringing red herrings & fallacies to some of our discussions. you have even recently started to lie & mis represent what i have said
You believe that I lied (I never btw.) you believe I brought red herrings and fallacies to our discussions, they weren’t. Buy you don’t know any of that to be true.
you did lie & i already pointed it out. you said i admitted i don't have any knowledge. that is a lie. you also put in quotes “I never said I had any knowledge” as if i had said that. another lie. you also used red herrings about cancer & global warming, when my questions are on covid. red herring distractions to take away from my question. not really hard yakka to highlight your dishonesty
1. Your questions weren’t about Covid, it was about what is next after Covid?
2. Listen to Mimi ! “It’s all about Me!” “My Questions “ me,me,me . Why should anyone want to answer your questions , when roughly 95% of the time you avoid every other fucker’s questions ?
You can only expect back what you give, and you constantly flat refuse to answer people’s questions or state any facts. And when anybody puts facts in front of you , you play your silly little “how do you know it’s true” bollocks.
Childish and pathetic really, but hey ho.
Like I said, I’ve read all I need to know , I’ve sussed you out, I don’t need to interact further on this one, it’s done and you’re done. All the best.x
Besides, it’s doing that stupid shit when it makes the previous posts about 3 miles long, so I can’t be fucked with that.
-
Re: the scam is over. what's next?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
the plandemic has run it's course. it has been stretched as far as it possibly could. your liberties & freedoms are being chipped away bit by bit. so be ready for the next one. so what is the next crisis that is coming up? some sort of orchestrated war between two main forces? or even staged weather crisis? aliens? space war or accident, food shortage, take your pick. i'm picking a weather manipulation climate crisis. more tsunami's, earthquakes, wild fires, floods, hurricanes, tornado's. i doubt these so called natural disasters will be natural. the current scam is crumbling & there must be a change of course & it is probably being done already & will probably ramp up, intentionally, on purpose, to create more chaos, more crisis, more disorder, because that's how people are controlled
So what you gonna do about it kid? You’re the one with all the knowledge, give us your masterplan.
where did i say i had all the knowledge & a masterplan?
You never. You just whinged and moaned and moaned and whinged. But if you don’t have any knowledge or a masterplan, why even bother starting a thread?
Why start a thread about something you, by your own admission don’t have any knowledge on the subject ?
are you ok? you seem to be making things up which is unusual for you. usually you & i can discuss things based on what each of says. i never whinged & moaned & whinged & moaned. i just mentioned that freedoms & liberties are being whittled away. advised preparation. asked what the next crisis could be. gave some possible suggestions. gave my prediction & ideas. is there something wrong with making predictions? i never said i don't have any knowledge or any plans. i started the thread to see other opinions on the next possible crisis. i never admitted i don't have any knowledge on the subject. just refuted your statement that claimed i had all the knowledge. i do have plans, i wouldn't call them master plans. depending where they discussion goes i may share some of those ideas
I’m good thanks, appreciate you asking though. You didn’t say that you didn’t have any knowledge , but you didn’t say you did?
Infact , you said a lot without saying much at all, which is one of your strong pints.
However, if one Protesteth sufficiently to say “I never said I had any knowledge” I legitimately came to the conclusion that you didn’t have any knowledge. Otherwise why protest so vehemently?
Now if everybody used your technique for debating, where would we be?
“I didn’t say I didn’t believe in Covid” “I didn’t say I did believe in Covid.”
“I didn’t say you can catch this through the air” “I didn’t say you can’t catch this through the air”
I get the feeling you don’t know if you’re Arthur or Martha!
you claimed i whinged & moaned & whinged & moaned. i disagree with you. you said i had all the knowledge. no one has all the knowledge so i corrected you. by my correcting you on your use of the word all you went on to assume that meant i didn't have any knowledge or plans. you then lied & said i admitted i don't have any knowledge & you are mis-quoting me. where did i say "i never said i had any knowledge".
i am just interested in honest discussion.
Come on now, this is too much!!! ;D:rotflmao:
you have been the one lying in this thread
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IobNcpiwpSc
you are just not capable of having an honest conversation based on what you know, have verified & proven for yourself to be true
You “BELIEVE” that to be the case, but how do you “KNOW” that’s the truth?
you have already proved it to be true by bringing red herrings & fallacies to some of our discussions. you have even recently started to lie & mis represent what i have said
You believe that I lied (I never btw.) you believe I brought red herrings and fallacies to our discussions, they weren’t. Buy you don’t know any of that to be true.
you did lie & i already pointed it out. you said i admitted i don't have any knowledge. that is a lie. you also put in quotes “I never said I had any knowledge” as if i had said that. another lie. you also used red herrings about cancer & global warming, when my questions are on covid. red herring distractions to take away from my question. not really hard yakka to highlight your dishonesty
1. Your questions weren’t about Covid, it was about what is next after Covid?
2. Listen to Mimi ! “It’s all about Me!” “My Questions “ me,me,me . Why should anyone want to answer your questions , when roughly 95% of the time you avoid every other fucker’s questions ?
You can only expect back what you give, and you constantly flat refuse to answer people’s questions or state any facts. And when anybody puts facts in front of you , you play your silly little “how do you know it’s true” bollocks.
Childish and pathetic really, but hey ho.
Like I said, I’ve read all I need to know , I’ve sussed you out, I don’t need to interact further on this one, it’s done and you’re done. All the best.x
Besides, it’s doing that stupid shit when it makes the previous posts about 3 miles long, so I can’t be fucked with that.
you seem to have an issue with comprehension. i said some of our discussions. in some of our discussions you have brought in red herrings to distract from the questions. this thread was about what could be next. you have lied & mis represented in this thread. no one has to answer my questions. i couldn't care less. i already know you only hold a belief. you have already admitted this. if you have any facts to prove your belief is real please preset them to show how you know them to be true. if you don't know something to be true then you only have faith, trust & a belief. that is not knowing. & here you come with the childish & pathetic insults when you can't prove your belief to be true. at least i have kept discussions between the two of us honest & polite. i am happy to have discussions with you if you are willing to come into them without your bias' & start from what you actually know but i won't expect much from a liar & someone who mis represents
-
Re: the scam is over. what's next?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanz
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanz
There is nothing wrong with doubt, but there is a huge difference between skeptical doubt and contrarian doubt. TIC what you seem to think is skeptical doubt is really you just being contrarian. We all have expressed skeptical doubt about your claims, especailly the idea the Covid is fake because of the lack of credible evidence you have presented compared to the extraordinariness of your claim. You have presented nothing. No evidence. All you have is a belief in the face of mountains of evidence. All you have done and continue to do here is exhibit contrarian doubt. You are not even aware of how your motivation and desire to want your unfounded belief to be true has caused you to dismiss sound evidence as though it were suspect.
spergy larry you have been asked several times to provide proof on ow you know your belief is true. you have still been unable to. you are too retarded to understand that you only hold a belief. your belief requires faith in authority
I am not sure what kind of an education you have had but there seem to be a few very basic fundamentals you are missing. It is much easier to educate yourself now and avail yourself of some amazing help from more qualified people to help you make better decisions and more informed choices. I suggest you might want to start there before trying to remotely assess others.
It is not my belief that Covid exists that is a widely accepted scientific truth. Even discounting my own personal anecdotal experience of Covid and that of those around me it is now impossible to ignore the FACT that experts who have a more accurate insight than you or i, after having trained, practiced and studied viruses for years have agreed on these facts.
Your insisting that it is merely a belief does not make it so.
You are quite clearly governed by naive paranoia, unable or unwilling to accept your own limits and potential. That is why you are pretending that your fairy tale learned belief negates true knowledge. You don't even understand the argument from authority fallacy you are accusing people of invoking by relying on knowledge rather then believing your mythical gobbledeegook. You seem to think that because our opinions agree with the authority that is scientific concensus, then we can not be thinking critically. Actually the opposite is true.
If we ( the majority here who disagree with your assertion that covid is not real) were to argue that Covid must exist simply because the experts say so, then yes correctly you could point out that is a logical fallacy based on an argument from authority. The thing is though nobody here is making that argument. Rather what everyone is doing is arguing that these huge amounts of experts have accumulated a wealth of evidence, and that their conclusions have been reviewed and verified by another huge amount of experts, and so their conclusions are currently the best explanations.
You are making an argument from false expertise. You have shown quite clearly that you struggle to compose a sentence, let alone construct an argument, and so we have to assume there is no way any of us could trust you to conduct even the most rudimentary experiment.
Your are conflating your own weak ill thought out opinion with fact. Your laymans opinion does not negate the scientific concensus of experts. History and experience has taught us all this again and again.
Experts are not infallible and experts can of course be questioned that is what makes the scientific method a much better example of knowing something than your proposed lone experiment by a non-expert, that would be merely anecdotal and amount to something far closer to belief than knowing anything.
You disagreeing with the experts is not an example of skeptical doubt because the strength and volume of evidence needed to overturn this knowledge would be massive and you have as of yet provided nothing that would alter, discount or overturn it.
You have nothing more than contrarian doubt.
more fallacies from larry the sperg. your acceptance of something is not you proving how you know it is true. you only hold a belief based on your faith in authority. you can believe what you like. i'm not interested in your beliefs. you can't prove how you know that belief is true. explanations are not you proving how you know the claims are true you spastic. i am not making any argument. i am asking you to tell me how you know your belief is true & what you have done to prove that. all you have to do is tell me how you know your belief is true or admit you only hold a belief. i already know you only hold a belief but it gives me great satisfaction to watch you squirm trying to defend your belief
-
Re: the scam is over. what's next?
I may have asked this before... but do you not believe in JUST Covid? Or does your disbelief cover all other viruses?
If you believe in other viruses but not COVID... is there a reason why this one is fake while the others are real?
Frankly, it would make more sense if you didn't believe in viruses in general. After all... you don't believe in cancer, so that's not much of a stretch.
Here's the thing.
Let's separate FACT from OPINION.
It's a FACT that thousands upon thousands of health professionals around the globe SAY that COVID exists. Let's use your terminology.
It's a FACT that we've all been exposed to these pronouncements, complete with data, numbers, and scientific explanations.
Follow me so far?
Ok.
Now... you BELIEVE that all that has been said about COVID is false. You BELIEVE Covid does not exist. It's fake.
Most of us BELIEVE that all that has been said about COVID is true. We BELIEVE Covid exists. It's real.
WHY your insistence that it is the rest of the world that needs to "prove" anything to you?
That's pretty self aggrandizing, isn't it?
Who are YOU that anyone needs to prove anything to you... and that your BELIEFS are facts while the rest of the world's are just BELIEFS?
I'm pretty sure this has been asked of you before... but I don't recall ever hearing a satisfactory answer.
If you were content with calling your own beliefs BELIEFS... even if you called our own beliefs BELIEFS as well... at least we could agree to disagree.
But you want to stand at a podium and shoot spitballs at an aircraft carrier.
Sorry... but it doesn't work that way.
-
Re: the scam is over. what's next?
The scientific method replaces belief with tested true knowledge. It is literally as close to 'knowing something' as you can get. It is aware of the need to constantly question and prove to itself any hypothesis it proposes. It is self aware. We don't believe covid exists, we know.
TIC is not self aware all he has is the deluded belief of the gullible fool. He does not even understand any of the logical fallacies he thinks that he is cleverly refuting. He has already insisted that he is not interested in evidence. He has just again insisted that using evidence is a logical fallacy. He calls it an appeal to authority. We are not using an appeal to authority at all. We are not claiming its true because our mum said it was, or because David Icke or Alex Jones said it was. We are reminding him that the empirical evidence says covid exists. That is knowing.
-
Re: the scam is over. what's next?
Well I got sick with the exact same symptoms I had been reading about for months. For me, that even trumps (I hate to use that word) all the scientific evidence that exists, if that's possible.
But...
I'm willing to start with the flawed premise that COVID is a belief.
My point is that "COVID doesn't exist" is also a belief... and who's to sit and judge who has to prove something to who?
In other words, it is my BELIEF that the existence of COVID is a FACT.
It is TIC's BELIEF that the non-existence of COVID is a FACT.
I've got millions of people and the entire global scientific community on my side. I've got personal experience having gotten sick with the EXACT SAME SYMPTOMS that have been identified as COVID by health professionals the world over.
But...
Even when starting with the false premise of COVID being just a belief.... my point is that TIC's point of view is ALSO a belief.
And since I don't believe in having burden of proof assigned arbitrarily... I don't accept the onus of having to prove anything.
Besides... the onus should be on the infinitely minute minority.
-
Re: the scam is over. what's next?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanz
The scientific method replaces belief with tested true knowledge. It is literally as close to 'knowing something' as you can get. It is aware of the need to constantly question and prove to itself any hypothesis it proposes. It is self aware. We don't believe covid exists, we know.
TIC is not self aware all he has is the deluded belief of the gullible fool. He does not even understand any of the logical fallacies he thinks that he is cleverly refuting. He has already insisted that he is not interested in evidence. He has just again insisted that using evidence is a logical fallacy. He calls it an appeal to authority. We are not using an appeal to authority at all. We are not claiming its true because our mum said it was, or because David Icke or Alex Jones said it was. We are reminding him that the empirical evidence says covid exists. That is knowing.
show me the scientific method you used to prove convid is real so i can repeat it. you know you cant because you only hold a belief you sperg
-
Re: the scam is over. what's next?
i hope this thread does not make it mainstream... lolol....
-
Re: the scam is over. what's next?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
I may have asked this before... but do you not believe in JUST Covid? Or does your disbelief cover all other viruses?
If you believe in other viruses but not COVID... is there a reason why this one is fake while the others are real?
Frankly, it would make more sense if you didn't believe in viruses in general. After all... you don't believe in cancer, so that's not much of a stretch.
Here's the thing.
Let's separate FACT from OPINION.
It's a FACT that thousands upon thousands of health professionals around the globe SAY that COVID exists. Let's use your terminology.
It's a FACT that we've all been exposed to these pronouncements, complete with data, numbers, and scientific explanations.
Follow me so far?
Ok.
Now... you BELIEVE that all that has been said about COVID is false. You BELIEVE Covid does not exist. It's fake.
Most of us BELIEVE that all that has been said about COVID is true. We BELIEVE Covid exists. It's real.
WHY your insistence that it is the rest of the world that needs to "prove" anything to you?
That's pretty self aggrandizing, isn't it?
Who are YOU that anyone needs to prove anything to you... and that your BELIEFS are facts while the rest of the world's are just BELIEFS?
I'm pretty sure this has been asked of you before... but I don't recall ever hearing a satisfactory answer.
If you were content with calling your own beliefs BELIEFS... even if you called our own beliefs BELIEFS as well... at least we could agree to disagree.
But you want to stand at a podium and shoot spitballs at an aircraft carrier.
Sorry... but it doesn't work that way.
people get ill or a disease that is a fact. i am interested in the cause of the illness or disease. you are mis representing me by saying i don't believe in cancer. cancer is an illness or disease. i know people get ill or a disease. i'm interested in knowing the cause. lets start from the very beginning. where did the claim come from? it wasn't from me. it was declared that there is a virus that is caught from outside the body, from person to person, through the air or off surfaces that is the cause of a pandemic. do you agree with that? that is the claim that is said to be real in my world. that claim needs to be proved. you believe that claim, that is your right. i am asking you how you know that claim is real. you have admitted you only have a belief. i am not interested in your belief. only your proof of how you know the claim is true
-
Re: the scam is over. what's next?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Well I got sick with the exact same symptoms I had been reading about for months. For me, that even trumps (I hate to use that word) all the scientific evidence that exists, if that's possible.
But...
I'm willing to start with the flawed premise that COVID is a belief.
My point is that "COVID doesn't exist" is also a belief... and who's to sit and judge who has to prove something to who?
In other words, it is my BELIEF that the existence of COVID is a FACT.
It is TIC's BELIEF that the non-existence of COVID is a FACT.
I've got millions of people and the entire global scientific community on my side. I've got personal experience having gotten sick with the EXACT SAME SYMPTOMS that have been identified as COVID by health professionals the world over.
But...
Even when starting with the false premise of COVID being just a belief.... my point is that TIC's point of view is ALSO a belief.
And since I don't believe in having burden of proof assigned arbitrarily... I don't accept the onus of having to prove anything.
Besides... the onus should be on the infinitely minute minority.
your symptoms are not you proving covid is real. the claim was made that something is real in my world. that claim needs to be proved. you have every right to believe that claim. your belief in that claim doesn't make it a fact. i don't hold a belief about covid. i am asking you how you know it is real & how you have proved that. you haven't proved it so it is only your belief. you are using fallacies by talking about consensus & experts. that is not you knowing. just like your symptoms are not you proving covid is a virus caught from outside the body, from person to person, through the air or off surfaces. it is just you having faith in what you are being told. the burden of proof is with those making the claim. you don't have to prove anything. you can keep believing. i am not interested in your beliefs
-
Re: the scam is over. what's next?
-
Re: the scam is over. what's next?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
I may have asked this before... but do you not believe in JUST Covid? Or does your disbelief cover all other viruses?
If you believe in other viruses but not COVID... is there a reason why this one is fake while the others are real?
Frankly, it would make more sense if you didn't believe in viruses in general. After all... you don't believe in cancer, so that's not much of a stretch
Man won't call cancer cancer and does not 'believe' in it. I just hope the likeminded never have to 'know' it. I mean really, that's pretty much a wrap in some things a man has to hear to know what and who they're dealing with ;D. Can only imagine how visits to medical professionals go.
-
Re: the scam is over. what's next?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
those damn domestic violent extremists
Oh I see... yet another conspiracy. :rolleyes:
But I'll bet you have the pulse of the situation and know exactly who is planning to attack the U.S. power grid... right? :cool:
Tell me... I don't know whether you were born when Timothy McVeigh bombed and destroyed a U.S. Federal Building in Oklahoma City.
But I'll bet you have your conspiracy theory on that too... huh?
Probably the media storyline about McVeigh being a domestic terrorist... hating the world... and wanting revenge against the U.S. government for the siege in Waco, Texas... is just too simplistic... right? :D
There must be some convoluted "Cabal-related" cockamamie story about how the U.S. government bombed its OWN building and then put the blame on poor little Timothy... right?
What does it matter that McVeigh was totally unremorseful all the way up to his execution by lethal injection in 2001.
Wait......... unlesssss he really wasn't executed at all... and is now living under protective custody.
Am I getting the hang of this or what?? :D :D
You see... that's why your arguments about COVID don't really hold any water.
But that's cool. You do you. ;) ;)
-
Re: the scam is over. what's next?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Spicoli
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
I may have asked this before... but do you not believe in JUST Covid? Or does your disbelief cover all other viruses?
If you believe in other viruses but not COVID... is there a reason why this one is fake while the others are real?
Frankly, it would make more sense if you didn't believe in viruses in general. After all... you don't believe in cancer, so that's not much of a stretch
Man won't call cancer cancer and does not 'believe' in it. I just hope the likeminded never have to 'know' it. I mean really, that's pretty much a wrap in some things a man has to hear to know what and who they're dealing with ;D. Can only imagine how visits to medical professionals go.
you can call it whatever you like. it is a disease or illness. i never said i don't believe in disease or illness. i'm interested in the cause
-
Re: the scam is over. what's next?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
those damn domestic violent extremists
Oh I see... yet
another conspiracy. :rolleyes:
But I'll bet you have the pulse of the situation and know exactly
who is planning to attack the U.S. power grid... right? :cool:
Tell me... I don't know whether you were born when Timothy McVeigh bombed and destroyed a U.S. Federal Building in Oklahoma City.
But I'll bet you have your conspiracy theory on
that too... huh?
Probably the media storyline about McVeigh being a domestic terrorist... hating the world... and wanting revenge against the U.S. government for the siege in Waco, Texas... is just too simplistic... right? :D
There must be some convoluted "Cabal-related" cockamamie story about how the U.S. government bombed its OWN building and then put the blame on poor little Timothy... right?
What does it matter that McVeigh was totally unremorseful all the way up to his execution by lethal injection in 2001.
Wait......... unlesssss he really wasn't executed at all... and is now living under protective custody.
Am I getting the hang of this or what?? :D :D
You see...
that's why your arguments about COVID don't really hold any water.
But that's cool. You do you. ;) ;)
who have they arrested & charged? should we just take their word? like they told us how the gulf of tonkin played out, until they changed that story. now you have created a red herring about the oklahoma city bombing. rip terrance yeakey. if those are your ideas on it that's fine but don't attach your red herrings to me. i wouldn't be surprised if this story was being used to cover for rolling blackouts or the like & orchestrated by the government
-
Re: the scam is over. what's next?
Has anybody on here ever actually been to Oklahoma City? It sound like a made up name?
-
Re: the scam is over. what's next?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Spicoli
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
I may have asked this before... but do you not believe in JUST Covid? Or does your disbelief cover all other viruses?
If you believe in other viruses but not COVID... is there a reason why this one is fake while the others are real?
Frankly, it would make more sense if you didn't believe in viruses in general. After all... you don't believe in cancer, so that's not much of a stretch
Man won't call cancer cancer and does not 'believe' in it. I just hope the likeminded never have to 'know' it. I mean really, that's pretty much a wrap in some things a man has to hear to know what and who they're dealing with ;D. Can only imagine how visits to medical professionals go.
you can call it whatever you like. it is a disease or illness. i never said i don't believe in disease or illness. i'm interested in the cause
Surely no conspiracy in the legitimacy of Cancer eh. How do you arrive at a cure with a refusal to categorize prioritize and treat. Going to assume you've been to a doctor over the years. And you've heard findings and diagnosis you may not have wanted to hear. Exactly how long did you sit in the office arguing that they iron clad prove what their years of education, study and medical experiences arrived out. At some point in life whether ya wanna admit it or not you like everyone else put trust, faith and reasoning process into another far more versed and educated in a field than yourself. From there our future decisions, direction and mind sets are forged in application and resulting experiences. You don't get the convenience of being the all 'knowing' all righteous right out of the gate.
-
Re: the scam is over. what's next?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
X
Has anybody on here ever actually been to Oklahoma City? It sound like a made up name?
I've always been told I was born just outside of Oklahoma City. Literally from day 1. Now however, in the light of the very real possibility it was all a ruse..I'm beginning to doubt my physical existence at all ??? :vanish:. Or maybe an alien? But I'd have to prove the existence of other planets. But I have seen them in movies. This is all very confusing :p.
-
Re: the scam is over. what's next?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanz
The scientific method replaces belief with tested true knowledge. It is literally as close to 'knowing something' as you can get. It is aware of the need to constantly question and prove to itself any hypothesis it proposes. It is self aware. We don't believe covid exists, we know.
TIC is not self aware all he has is the deluded belief of the gullible fool. He does not even understand any of the logical fallacies he thinks that he is cleverly refuting. He has already insisted that he is not interested in evidence. He has just again insisted that using evidence is a logical fallacy. He calls it an appeal to authority. We are not using an appeal to authority at all. We are not claiming its true because our mum said it was, or because David Icke or Alex Jones said it was. We are reminding him that the empirical evidence says covid exists. That is knowing.
show me the scientific method you used to prove convid is real so i can repeat it. you know you cant because you only hold a belief you sperg
You can't even construct a sentence or form an argument, so what hope is there of you being able to understand the fact that 'the scientific method' is an empirical method of acquiring knowledge? It is literally how we all know things, rather than relying on beliefs like you, you thick twat.
It is not a single anecdotal amateur experiment that you can inexpertly complete without independent observers, checks and measures carried out, that would be doomed by your own cognitive assumptions distorting your observations and conclusions.
If you can't start a sentence with a capital letter or spell aspergers, I am not sure you can be trusted to even do up the buttons on a lab coat, let alone follow lab protocol.
-
Re: the scam is over. what's next?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Spicoli
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Spicoli
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
I may have asked this before... but do you not believe in JUST Covid? Or does your disbelief cover all other viruses?
If you believe in other viruses but not COVID... is there a reason why this one is fake while the others are real?
Frankly, it would make more sense if you didn't believe in viruses in general. After all... you don't believe in cancer, so that's not much of a stretch
Man won't call cancer cancer and does not 'believe' in it. I just hope the likeminded never have to 'know' it. I mean really, that's pretty much a wrap in some things a man has to hear to know what and who they're dealing with ;D. Can only imagine how visits to medical professionals go.
you can call it whatever you like. it is a disease or illness. i never said i don't believe in disease or illness. i'm interested in the cause
Surely no conspiracy in the legitimacy of Cancer eh. How do you arrive at a cure with a refusal to categorize prioritize and treat. Going to assume you've been to a doctor over the years. And you've heard findings and diagnosis you may not have wanted to hear. Exactly how long did you sit in the office arguing that they iron clad prove what their years of education, study and medical experiences arrived out. At some point in life whether ya wanna admit it or not you like everyone else put trust, faith and reasoning process into another far more versed and educated in a field than yourself. From there our future decisions, direction and mind sets are forged in application and resulting experiences. You don't get the convenience of being the all 'knowing' all righteous right out of the gate.
i know someone who was diagnosed with a form of cancer. turns out it wasn't. calling her disease cancer didn't help establish the cause of her illness. you are mis representing me. if i chose to put my trust & faith in another person there is no problem. i wouldn't go & claim that i know what they are saying is true. only that i have faith & trust & a belief in what i'm being told. it's fine for someone to have a belief. that is not the same as knowing
-
Re: the scam is over. what's next?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanz
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanz
The scientific method replaces belief with tested true knowledge. It is literally as close to 'knowing something' as you can get. It is aware of the need to constantly question and prove to itself any hypothesis it proposes. It is self aware. We don't believe covid exists, we know.
TIC is not self aware all he has is the deluded belief of the gullible fool. He does not even understand any of the logical fallacies he thinks that he is cleverly refuting. He has already insisted that he is not interested in evidence. He has just again insisted that using evidence is a logical fallacy. He calls it an appeal to authority. We are not using an appeal to authority at all. We are not claiming its true because our mum said it was, or because David Icke or Alex Jones said it was. We are reminding him that the empirical evidence says covid exists. That is knowing.
show me the scientific method you used to prove convid is real so i can repeat it. you know you cant because you only hold a belief you sperg
You can't even construct a sentence or form an argument, so what hope is there of you being able to understand the fact that 'the scientific method' is an empirical method of acquiring knowledge? It is literally how we all know things, rather than relying on beliefs like you, you thick twat.
It is not a single anecdotal amateur experiment that you can inexpertly complete without independent observers, checks and measures carried out, that would be doomed by your own cognitive assumptions distorting your observations and conclusions.
If you can't start a sentence with a capital letter or spell aspergers, I am not sure you can be trusted to even do up the buttons on a lab coat, let alone follow lab protocol.
seven times larry the sperg you have no scientific method to show that your hypothesis that convid is a virus caught from outside the body, from person to person, through the air or off surfaces. you only hold a belief you spastic
-
Re: the scam is over. what's next?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanz
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanz
The scientific method replaces belief with tested true knowledge. It is literally as close to 'knowing something' as you can get. It is aware of the need to constantly question and prove to itself any hypothesis it proposes. It is self aware. We don't believe covid exists, we know.
TIC is not self aware all he has is the deluded belief of the gullible fool. He does not even understand any of the logical fallacies he thinks that he is cleverly refuting. He has already insisted that he is not interested in evidence. He has just again insisted that using evidence is a logical fallacy. He calls it an appeal to authority. We are not using an appeal to authority at all. We are not claiming its true because our mum said it was, or because David Icke or Alex Jones said it was. We are reminding him that the empirical evidence says covid exists. That is knowing.
show me the scientific method you used to prove convid is real so i can repeat it. you know you cant because you only hold a belief you sperg
You can't even construct a sentence or form an argument, so what hope is there of you being able to understand the fact that 'the scientific method' is an empirical method of acquiring knowledge? It is literally how we all know things, rather than relying on beliefs like you, you thick twat.
It is not a single anecdotal amateur experiment that you can inexpertly complete without independent observers, checks and measures carried out, that would be doomed by your own cognitive assumptions distorting your observations and conclusions.
If you can't start a sentence with a capital letter or spell aspergers, I am not sure you can be trusted to even do up the buttons on a lab coat, let alone follow lab protocol.
seven times larry the sperg you have no scientific method to show that your hypothesis that convid is a virus caught from outside the body, from person to person, through the air or off surfaces. you only hold a belief you spastic
The scientific method is exactly how and why we all know that Covid is real. Your idea that you conducting a one off experiment would be a way of you knowing something is delusional nonsense. All it would do is support your assumptions and bias. You would have to trust all the manufacturers of the equipment and previously agreed scientific methods and conditions to do so. All these were arrived at by consensus, which because you are unable to think critically, is something you think is an indication of an international conspiracy.
It is not my hypothesis, it is one proposed and tested by thousands of competing experts in independent labs around the world. Their consensus is arrived at by meticulous competitive peer review of each other's work.
We have all conducted numerous home experiments with lateral flow tests in order to be able to go about our lives and not be crippled by fear or the fairy tale beliefs that have obviously crippled you mentally and emotionally for nearly two years now.
We know, we truly know whilst you only believe.
-
Re: the scam is over. what's next?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanz
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanz
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanz
The scientific method replaces belief with tested true knowledge. It is literally as close to 'knowing something' as you can get. It is aware of the need to constantly question and prove to itself any hypothesis it proposes. It is self aware. We don't believe covid exists, we know.
TIC is not self aware all he has is the deluded belief of the gullible fool. He does not even understand any of the logical fallacies he thinks that he is cleverly refuting. He has already insisted that he is not interested in evidence. He has just again insisted that using evidence is a logical fallacy. He calls it an appeal to authority. We are not using an appeal to authority at all. We are not claiming its true because our mum said it was, or because David Icke or Alex Jones said it was. We are reminding him that the empirical evidence says covid exists. That is knowing.
show me the scientific method you used to prove convid is real so i can repeat it. you know you cant because you only hold a belief you sperg
You can't even construct a sentence or form an argument, so what hope is there of you being able to understand the fact that 'the scientific method' is an empirical method of acquiring knowledge? It is literally how we all know things, rather than relying on beliefs like you, you thick twat.
It is not a single anecdotal amateur experiment that you can inexpertly complete without independent observers, checks and measures carried out, that would be doomed by your own cognitive assumptions distorting your observations and conclusions.
If you can't start a sentence with a capital letter or spell aspergers, I am not sure you can be trusted to even do up the buttons on a lab coat, let alone follow lab protocol.
seven times larry the sperg you have no scientific method to show that your hypothesis that convid is a virus caught from outside the body, from person to person, through the air or off surfaces. you only hold a belief you spastic
The scientific method is exactly how and why we all know that Covid is real. Your idea that you conducting a one off experiment would be a way of you knowing something is delusional nonsense. All it would do is support your assumptions and bias. You would have to trust all the manufacturers of the equipment and previously agreed scientific methods and conditions to do so. All these were arrived at by consensus, which because you are unable to think critically, is something you think is an indication of an international conspiracy.
It is not my hypothesis, it is one proposed and tested by thousands of competing experts in independent labs around the world. Their consensus is arrived at by meticulous competitive peer review of each other's work.
We have all conducted numerous home experiments with lateral flow tests in order to be able to go about our lives and not be crippled by fear or the fairy tale beliefs that have obviously crippled you mentally and emotionally for nearly two years now.
We know, we truly know whilst you only believe.
you don't know shit. you only believe what you have been told & you are too retarded to understand the difference. i never said anything about a one of experiment. i am asking for the scientific method you used to verify your belief to be true. consensus is not you proving the claim is true & is another fallacy. if you know something that would mean you have proved it to be true & i can also verify it. you believe, you only believe spergy larry.
-
Re: the scam is over. what's next?
I don’t really want to get embroiled in this argument (love fest), but don’t forget I did a scientific experiment that showed I could isolate the virus, and then I could catch it through the air and off a surface
Sadly, the tramp I was keeping in the garage to prove some further medical breakthroughs didn’t quite make it. I think he died sometime on Friday night as I was trying to slim him down a bit to properly pass through my sieve to make absolutely sure there were no contaminants etc.
Its a shame as I wasted some of my cats food on him, but there is another one on a local park bench that I have my eye on for next time. Rest assured I will keep you informed. I’m looking to capture him like Buffalo Bill did, with some sort of van and a plaster cast and a ruse with a sofa.
-
Re: the scam is over. what's next?
https://c.tenor.com/GP00zCMDfa4AAAAC/airplane-slap.gif
It's no use.
She doesn't believe COVID exists either.
-
Re: the scam is over. what's next?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
it's okay for you to believe what you believe. it's not okay for you to demand others believe what you believe. sounds like your trying to convince someone of your belief
-
Re: the scam is over. what's next?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
it's okay for you to believe what you believe. it's not okay for you to demand others believe what you believe. sounds like your trying to convince someone of your belief
I'm not, TIC. And I haven't for a long time. But the door swings both ways on this.
-
Re: the scam is over. what's next?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
it's okay for you to believe what you believe. it's not okay for you to demand others believe what you believe. sounds like your trying to convince someone of your belief
I'm not, TIC. And I haven't for a long time. But the door swings both ways on this.
like i said, believe what you want to believe. i'm not interested in your belief, only what you can prove to be true
-
Re: the scam is over. what's next?
Let's be clear here. TIC is a liar.
He claims to only be interested in what you can prove to be true but then refuses to consider any kind of evidence.
What he really wants, is to have his bias and his childish beliefs in conspiracy theories, that make him think he is better than everyone here, confirmed.
Calling a virus that has affected everyone here 'convid' and then claiming 'the scam is over' is not a neutral position that respects anyone's acquired knowledge. It is an arrogant demand to be treated differently and to give presidency to beliefs over knowledge.
His insistence that scientific consensus is not evidence, is not so different to claims made by flat earthers or religious crackpots.
-
Re: the scam is over. what's next?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
it's okay for you to believe what you believe. it's not okay for you to demand others believe what you believe. sounds like your trying to convince someone of your belief
I'm not, TIC. And I haven't for a long time. But the door swings both ways on this.
like i said, believe what you want to believe. i'm not interested in your belief, only what you can prove to be true
I'm not interested in your belief either. Hence... the swinging door. ;)
-
Re: the scam is over. what's next?
'Deja poo'
The feeling that you've heard this shit before
:lickish:
-
Re: the scam is over. what's next?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanz
Let's be clear here. TIC is a liar.
He claims to only be interested in what you can prove to be true but then refuses to consider any kind of evidence.
What he really wants, is to have his bias and his childish beliefs in conspiracy theories, that make him think he is better than everyone here, confirmed.
Calling a virus that has affected everyone here 'convid' and then claiming 'the scam is over' is not a neutral position that respects anyone's acquired knowledge. It is an arrogant demand to be treated differently and to give presidency to beliefs over knowledge.
His insistence that scientific consensus is not evidence, is not so different to claims made by flat earthers or religious crackpots.
you have been proven a liar over & over spergy larry. you haven't provided any evidence of the scientific method you used to prove your belief. all i want is for you to prove your belief. & we both know you can't or you would have done so already. the problem is you can't admit you only hold a belief & faith in authority. scientific consensus is another fallacy. i am asking you to prove your belief
-
Re: the scam is over. what's next?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
it's okay for you to believe what you believe. it's not okay for you to demand others believe what you believe. sounds like your trying to convince someone of your belief
I'm not, TIC. And I haven't for a long time. But the door swings both ways on this.
like i said, believe what you want to believe. i'm not interested in your belief, only what you can prove to be true
I'm not interested in your belief either. Hence... the swinging door. ;)
it's not my job to prove your belief is real
-
Re: the scam is over. what's next?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanz
Let's be clear here. TIC is a liar.
He claims to only be interested in what you can prove to be true but then refuses to consider any kind of evidence.
What he really wants, is to have his bias and his childish beliefs in conspiracy theories, that make him think he is better than everyone here, confirmed.
Calling a virus that has affected everyone here 'convid' and then claiming 'the scam is over' is not a neutral position that respects anyone's acquired knowledge. It is an arrogant demand to be treated differently and to give presidency to beliefs over knowledge.
His insistence that scientific consensus is not evidence, is not so different to claims made by flat earthers or religious crackpots.
you have been proven a liar over & over spergy larry. you haven't provided any evidence of the scientific method you used to prove your belief. all i want is for you to prove your belief. & we both know you can't or you would have done so already. the problem is you can't admit you only hold a belief & faith in authority. scientific consensus is another fallacy. i am asking you to prove your belief
Ask away numbnuts for all the good it will do you. Scientific concensus is not a fallacy, far from it. It is the wheel that progress was built upon. It has given you and everyone else the kind of security and unimaginable diverse range of experiences and benefits that generations before us could not even dream about. You are and always have been the one who the onus falls to prove your pseudo scientific psychobabble.
You are not able to understand the rules of engagement and so have no right to anything. You don't even understand what a logical fallacy is.
The Scientific method is not a set of rules you can follow to carry out a one off experiment, it is the method by which knowledge is gathered by questioning, experimenting and proving again and again, something you as a clueless twat waffle are still struggling to comprehend. The argument was won months ago and all you have is your belief and repeated lies.
You say you want people to prove their belief when you will not accept any kind of evidence whatsoever. Anyone can make vague, unobservable claims that are unfalsifiable but we all have rock solid verifiable knowledge to explain what you are too dense to absorb.
There are no plausible mechanisms that allow for your extraordinairy exaggerated claims to be explained using existing knowledge and so they can be ignored by anyone with even just a little common sense.
-
Re: the scam is over. what's next?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanz
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanz
Let's be clear here. TIC is a liar.
He claims to only be interested in what you can prove to be true but then refuses to consider any kind of evidence.
What he really wants, is to have his bias and his childish beliefs in conspiracy theories, that make him think he is better than everyone here, confirmed.
Calling a virus that has affected everyone here 'convid' and then claiming 'the scam is over' is not a neutral position that respects anyone's acquired knowledge. It is an arrogant demand to be treated differently and to give presidency to beliefs over knowledge.
His insistence that scientific consensus is not evidence, is not so different to claims made by flat earthers or religious crackpots.
you have been proven a liar over & over spergy larry. you haven't provided any evidence of the scientific method you used to prove your belief. all i want is for you to prove your belief. & we both know you can't or you would have done so already. the problem is you can't admit you only hold a belief & faith in authority. scientific consensus is another fallacy. i am asking you to prove your belief
Ask away numbnuts for all the good it will do you. Scientific concensus is not a fallacy, far from it. It is the wheel that progress was built upon. It has given you and everyone else the kind of security and unimaginable diverse range of experiences and benefits that generations before us could not even dream about. You are and always have been the one who the onus falls to prove your pseudo scientific psychobabble.
You are not able to understand the rules of engagement and so have no right to anything. You don't even understand what a logical fallacy is.
The Scientific method is not a set of rules you can follow to carry out a one off experiment, it is the method by which knowledge is gathered by questioning, experimenting and proving again and again, something you as a clueless twat waffle are still struggling to comprehend. The argument was won months ago and all you have is your belief and repeated lies.
You say you want people to prove their belief when you will not accept any kind of evidence whatsoever. Anyone can make vague, unobservable claims that are unfalsifiable but we all have rock solid verifiable knowledge to explain what you are too dense to absorb.
There are no plausible mechanisms that allow for your extraordinairy exaggerated claims to be explained using existing knowledge and so they can be ignored by anyone with even just a little common sense.
talking about consensus is nothing you have personally done. this discussion is between you & i. if you haven't verified the claims yourself then you only have faith that they are true. that is a belief you spastic. i never said anything about a one off experiment spergy larry. give me everything you have done to test the claim & prove it to be true. then i should be able to repeat everything you have done & prove it true as well. you have already admitted that you haven't done anything & only have faith & trust in others, that is why you keep using fallacies & talking about what others have done. see i believe i could beat your wife in a hundred metre sprint with me on my knees but until i did so it is only a belief. once i did we would know that i was able to. watching you sperg gives me great pleasure & i love that you are a sucker for punishment cause you will be treated this way every time i reply to you. talk soon retard
-
Re: the scam is over. what's next?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
it's okay for you to believe what you believe. it's not okay for you to demand others believe what you believe. sounds like your trying to convince someone of your belief
I'm not, TIC. And I haven't for a long time. But the door swings both ways on this.
like i said, believe what you want to believe. i'm not interested in your belief, only what you can prove to be true
I'm not interested in your belief either. Hence... the swinging door. ;)
it's not my job to prove your belief is real
and it's not mine to prove yours
(See how easy that was?) ;)
-
Re: the scam is over. what's next?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
it's okay for you to believe what you believe. it's not okay for you to demand others believe what you believe. sounds like your trying to convince someone of your belief
I'm not, TIC. And I haven't for a long time. But the door swings both ways on this.
like i said, believe what you want to believe. i'm not interested in your belief, only what you can prove to be true
I'm not interested in your belief either. Hence... the swinging door. ;)
it's not my job to prove your belief is real
and it's not mine to prove yours
(See how easy that was?) ;)
you have the belief that something is real, not me. you either believe something is real or you prove something is real. you are unable to prove your belief so that is what you hold, a belief. like someone who believes they have super powers, it's not my job to prove they don't. there is no belief on my part in the discussion
