Pacstradamus strike again!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by Pacdbest2
Printable View
Pacstradamus strike again!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by Pacdbest2
There was only one person who wanted to fight seriously.Quote:
Originally Posted by YoungbloodYou must not like rules either. Or scoring. Why bother even having them and just give the fight to what and who we prefer and save a lot of time without stepping in the ring.Quote:
Originally Posted by The Rela
Hey, if you like the way Dirrel fights, that's fine.
Personally, I like boxing, not cycling, running or wrestling.
It's a fight.
Froch is an asshole.
ok then if dirrell gets a point taken for holding in every round because he HELD ALOT and no one will disagree even if you think he won. But yes if dirrell gets a point taken off every round for holding then i will score it even because dirrell landed more. For the record i think dirrell is a far better fighter but didnt do enough to take a champs belt by holding etcQuote:
Originally Posted by eagleWhat a load of biased shit. I cant give a man a win who doesnt land 4 punches the whole night. Even? Idiot.Quote:
Originally Posted by oakleyno1
Froch was the only one hurt in this fight, Dirrells reflexes were spot on. Watch any of the highlights during this fight they all belonged to Andre. Very unfair.
No, it's a boxing match. And Direll showed MUCH better boxing skills throughout the match.Quote:
Originally Posted by The Rela
Rabbit punches? That would be when Dirrel was holding and turned his head because he didn't want to fight.Quote:
Originally Posted by CFHTo be fair, Froch probably landed over 50% of the 4,000 rabbit punches that he threw to the back of Dirrell's head.Quote:
Originally Posted by Violent DemiseSwing and miss is more your style, huh?Quote:
Originally Posted by The Rela
If this was not a tourney....second -third oppurtunities...Dirrell would have went fooking nuts in interview.Wheres the fire ???
I like Froch, but Dirrell won that fight. Froch barely landed! Dirrell was hitting him with way sharper punches throughout most of the fight. Froch had some moments in the middle, but generally, it was a great performance from Dirrell.
And if I hear the phrase "You must take a title from a champion" again, I'm going to start cracking skulls. You take the title by winning more rounds, which involves landing more and taking less, just like in any normal match. I simply cannot believe the stupidity of people who use that primitive statement to cover up a bad decision.
Does it state in the rulebook that judges have to naturally favour the champion when scoring? No. :rolleyes:
Really? Dirrell did alot of running and holding. I'm not sure you can win a world title on fantastic defence. Froch didn't do much either. I don't think you could complain either way. It was close in that nothing fucking happened.Quote:
Originally Posted by CFH
seriously...
frotch is either a moron or an ultimate scumbag...
''im gonna hit him on the back of the head... not illegally'
:(
also...
http://www.boxingvid.com/wp-content/...io_tarver1.jpg
"SOMETIMES YOU HAVE TO PUT IT ON CROTCH"
Exactly, its a fight. The guy who lands the most punches should win. Wait.
Hahahahaha!!
What a joke, Primetime just said Froch came on strong after 5 rounds then showed some highlights of Froch hitting air!!
This is boxing, yes Dirrell was negative he was holding but thats the refs job to sort it out not the judges, Dirrell landed all the meaningful punches even wobbled Froch, Froch was clueless.
I had Froch winning three rounds 2 drawn rounds and Dirrell taking 7.
Fair enough. I guess it's whatever style you like.Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeyUKNo, it's a boxing match. And Direll showed MUCH better boxing skills throughout the match.Quote:
Originally Posted by The Rela
But if Direll fighted a similar style boxer, I wouldn't be shelling out for PPV!
I hate to say it but Froch makes a good point.