Quote:
Originally Posted by Legend KilleR
Quote:
Originally Posted by Violent Demise
Quote:
Originally Posted by _the_answer_
Quote:
Originally Posted by Violent Demise
None of them are
none of them? ???
Quote:
Originally Posted by Violent Demise
Quote:
Originally Posted by Legend KilleR
this is base on what happened to the legends the night they met the fighter who defeated them...not what happen afterwards or before they step in the ring with these legend killers...
bottom line em mab tito shane bhop and roy came in as legends...they all lose...but judge the way they lost that night...bhop didn't lose as bad as the others...i'd say mab and em lost in the worst way by the same guy...tito look like an amature against winky that was pretty bad...but i'd say he lost worst to bhop so I can't say winky is more of a legend killer...
I'd have to give it to pac...though he lost once to em...but he came back and eff him up in the rematch...it was a matter of what pac didn't do in the first fight more then what em did...that fight had rigged fight written all over it too...weird they had pac wear those gloves...weird pacs promoter then mention a third fight...weird pac was made to take physical exam so close to the fight...weird pac was drain blood 2 days before the fight...weird without those bullshyt and those bullshyt promoter pac eff em up in the rematch...
now lets look at tarver...gotta say though a lot of people hate him now...but his still going down in history to be the man who ktfo of the shinny chin of roy jones j.r...gotta admit that night was crazy in the second round we were all shock...the whole world put tarver on the spot light...that really is a way to kill a legendary career in one night...
well i gotta say j.t barely beat bhop...bhop then quickly killed the noise tarver was making...
It's obvious you don't know the true definition of a legend killer.
that being said gives us the conclusion that one of these fighters 'KILLED' this guys legends...
mexican dude?
you hate pac? your a LEGEND HATER
I can't believe I got to explain this. But alright here we go. I like Pac, but he ain't no legend killer. How you going to kill a legend but that legend going to come back and become champion again (Barerra). I guess the legend ain't dead right? And how the hell you going to consider it killing a legend when Pac is 1-1 against that legend (Morales)? Pac beat legends but he ain't killed any of them. Is that clear enough for you?
you miss out the point...its not the CAREER KILLER its legends who got killed inside the ring...mab and em lost in the worst way...so much for them being legends and just get dispose of by pac...yes LEGEND KO'ER fits pac more comfortably for you aye...but hey the way they lost to pac was brutal...he didn't kill thier career he just killed them inside the ring thats why...its LEGEND KILLER not CAREER KILLER...okay?
ive thought about this since first posting an answer, and i just have one problem w/ this whole thing. IMO its using a word like "killed" and "killer" when it comes to boxing. it is in very poor taste . Boxing is brutal, and unfortunately many lives have been taken because of this, and those lives taken have to remembered w/ pride and sorrow. So why place such pride on describing a fighter as a killer in the first place. I doubt that of all the things a fighter wants to be remembered as, that one of those things is as a killer.
