Who Is Most Underrated Heavyweight Of All Time Come And Vote

....that's gay


Ibeabuchi is overrated if anything


Sam Langford is the most underrated

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Michael Spinks

Michael Spinks is the most underrated heavy weight of all time

---

Yes i can tell by your name ;)

To be honest though and hate to break this to you because your fan of Spinks but only reason he got hw title was getting two gifts vs old Holmes and then he got wiped out vs Tyson Spinks was great Lightheavyweight no doubt but most underrated Heavyweight of all time ?? no way.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Michael Spinks

Michael Spinks is the most underrated heavy weight of all time

---

Yes i can tell by your name ;)

To be honest though and hate to break this to you because your fan of Spinks but only reason he got hw title was getting two gifts vs old Holmes and then he got wiped out vs Tyson Spinks was great Lightheavyweight no doubt but most underrated Heavyweight of all time ?? no way.

---

well holmes got a gift over an past prime norton

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by undefeated

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Michael Spinks

Michael Spinks is the most underrated heavy weight of all time

---

Yes i can tell by your name ;)

To be honest though and hate to break this to you because your fan of Spinks but only reason he got hw title was getting two gifts vs old Holmes and then he got wiped out vs Tyson Spinks was great Lightheavyweight no doubt but most underrated Heavyweight of all time ?? no way.

---

well holmes got a gift over an past prime norton

---

I did answer this before Norton won 1st round Holmes won next 8 or 7 easy as pie Norton then took over winning most of later rounds then he definitely lost 13th or 14th round can't quite remember and 15th round is questionable but Holmes clearly won by 2 rounds Norton won no more than 6 rounds 7 at max.

I dont think Jack Johnson is usually given enough credit for being an alltime great

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by VanChilds

I dont think Jack Johnson is usually given enough credit for being an alltime great

---

Added him mate 8)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by VanChilds

I dont think Jack Johnson is usually given enough credit for being an alltime great

---

How can you underate Jack?
There is no doubt that he was one of,if not arguably the greatest Heavyweight of the first half of the century

I can't believe people think Bowe is underrated - a great champ is more than skills and wins in the ring, its balls, taking fights, fighting the best out there even if you losse - after he ducked lewis he was and always will be an overrated coward in my eyes, it is a shame because he was a very skilled boxer.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by undefeated

holmes is great--one thing is he succeded ali---and another thing is he tried 2 act like ali--running his mouth--but he never lost-(during prime) and u cant take that away from him--he also says he the greatest 2 ever lace up the gloves----hell no--anywhere from a 1964-1975 ali --woulda whuped holmes and make holmes look like a cheap imitation

---

Totally Disagree.. Holmes had a real good shot of beating Ali in both there primes, anyone to say otherwise just hasnt studied the 2 closely.. Holmes had it all speed, power, chin, heart and the best damn Jab that divison had ever seen... that fight to me is a total pickem and one of the potentially best matchups that could ever be made

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lyle

....that's gay


Ibeabuchi is overrated if anything

Sam Langford is the most underrated

---

Looks like someone else is sipping out of the gay cup too with a comment like that, huh sunshine ;D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JT Rock

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by undefeated

holmes is great--one thing is he succeded ali---and another thing is he tried 2 act like ali--running his mouth--but he never lost-(during prime) and u cant take that away from him--he also says he the greatest 2 ever lace up the gloves----hell no--anywhere from a 1964-1975 ali --woulda whuped holmes and make holmes look like a cheap imitation

---

Totally Disagree.. Holmes had a real good shot of beating Ali in both there primes, anyone to say otherwise just hasnt studied the 2 closely.. Holmes had it all speed, power, chin, heart and the best damn Jab that divison had ever seen... that fight to me is a total pickem and one of the potentially best matchups that could ever be made

---

Well said Jt totally agree :coolclick: in 24 then.

When Holmes boxed Norton, Norton wasnt in his prime. Also Holmes haddnt reached his by a long way

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Scrap

When Holmes boxed Norton, Norton wasnt in his prime. Also Holmes haddnt reached his by a long way

---

Agreed with this but Norton was still very formidable though because prior to Holmes fight he lost razor thin decision to Ali and beat great fighter like Jimmy Young but i don't see how people can say Norton was robbed against Holmes challenger Holmes took it to champion Norton and won first 8 rounds quite easily Norton won like i said 6 at most maybe 7 but Holmes did enough imo he won too many of earlier rounds and also won 13th or 14th round can't quite remember which round but all respect to Norton he tried his hardest but wide points gap in early going was little too much.

The rock 49 and 0 with the belt still a record not touched

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by the duke

The rock 49 and 0 with the belt still a record not touched

---

He isn't underrated though.