UFC 75

Completely disagree with the Hammil got robbed sentiment.

Hammil won the first round and he won it big, fair enough. Not big enough to be a 10-8 or anything, and he did most of the damage to Bisping's face in that round. He was working good with the heavy jabs and he caught Bisping flush on that one strike with Bisping's back to the ground.

Other then that in the second round, Bisping's striking was the far better. Hammil missed with absolutely everything up top and Bisping was countering very nice. He without a doubt won the second.

The third was closer, Hammil had Bisping on his back for a good minute and then closed the round good. But Bisping surely had the better and cleaner striking and he stood up from both of those takedowns in the third fairly quick. He definitely won that round.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by amat

Completely disagree with the Hammil got robbed sentiment.

Hammil won the first round and he won it big, fair enough. Not big enough to be a 10-8 or anything, and he did most of the damage to Bisping's face in that round. He was working good with the heavy jabs and he caught Bisping flush on that one strike with Bisping's back to the ground.

Other then that in the second round, Bisping's striking was the far better. Hammil missed with absolutely everything up top and Bisping was countering very nice. He without a doubt won the second.

The third was closer, Hammil had Bisping on his back for a good minute and then closed the round good. But Bisping surely had the better and cleaner striking and he stood up from both of those takedowns in the third fairly quick. He definitely won that round.

---

Bullshat! Bisping got a gift decision cus he's a Brit in England. What about head kicker? Cro Cop is screwed now for any big fights, losing twice to decent to good opposition, but nothin special.

The Hamill Bisping fight was close. I think everyone agrees hamill won the first round and that is beyond dispute. he landed some shots in the first and did the damage to Bisping in the first. In the second yes Hamill was the one coming forward but he landed nothing. Just coming forward is not enough, you have to do something and Hamill landed nothing. bisping threw more punches and landed more than Hamill. Yes Matt got a takedown, but he did nothing with it!!! When on the ground bipsing was busier from the bottom looking for a sub that Hamill was on top just laying on top of Mike. Mike won the 2nd round.

The 3rd. Again Hamill landed nothing whereas Mike landed shots, moved better and threw more. All hamill did was come forward and miss. He got a couple of takedowns that Mike did well to stand up from but again he did NOTHING whilst on the gound. Mike was looking for an arm, trying to work the rubber guard etc.

It was a close fight and i know i am in the minority but watch the fight again and see how much Matt misses in the 2nd and 3rd rounds. He had nothing to offer. If the fight would have gone another two round Mike would have been a clear winner.

As i said it was a close fight but i think Bisping edged it. Everyone is just swayed by the fact Matt was the one coming forward the whole time, totally ignoring the fact he landed nothing whilst coming forward.

Ho hum

Round one. 10-9 obviously Hamill, he took him down at will, rocked Bisping a couple of times, opened up cuts under both eyes.

Round two. 10-9 Hamill. Hamill had two takedowns, was more aggressive and controlled the octagon the whole time. They both landed shots but I think Hamill's were bigger. Bisping tried to counter punch but ended up backpedaling the whole round.

Round three. Close round at best 10-9 Bisping. He landed some big shots, stuffed Hamill twice, and worked a few subs but Hamill had some nice takedowns and worked the ground.

The worst part is Bispings lack of class after the fight. Hamill made him look bad in AND out of the ring.

Bisping got exposed, Hamill got robbed, and the fans got screwed. Everyone lost that fight.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Nate17

Round one. 10-9 obviously Hamill, he took him down at will, rocked Bisping a couple of times, opened up cuts under both eyes.

Round two. 10-9 Hamill. Hamill had two takedowns, was more aggressive and controlled the octagon the whole time. They both landed shots but I think Hamill's were bigger. Bisping tried to counter punch but ended up backpedaling the whole round.

Round three. Close round at best 10-9 Bisping. He landed some big shots, stuffed Hamill twice, and worked a few subs but Hamill had some nice takedowns and worked the ground.

The worst part is Bispings lack of class after the fight. Hamill made him look bad in AND out of the ring.

Bisping got exposed, Hamill got robbed, and the fans got screwed. Everyone lost that fight.

---

Kind of agree with you there. However in round 2 Hamill really didn't land nowhere near what he landed in the first. Yes Hamill plodded forward, got a couple of takedowns but in the takedown Bisping was busier by far. Hamillmissed much more than Bisping did.