Yes.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr140
Printable View
Yes.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr140
Thank you ice i know it sounds dumb for me to ask but i really dont know and cc for the answer
The Auzzies nicked it from us ;)
Fooking convicts ;D
ICE COLD - Don't take this a dig at you because it isn't......but
Something you don't appreciate is that your age is very relevant. You CANNOT get the same appreciation of an era of boxing or a particular fighter if you weren't there living it at the time. This is why you don't think Tyson would beat Lewis. You don't have the benefit of being around at the time and really getting a taste of how awesome he was. He didn't get notorius for his exploits out of the ring, because he didn't have any exploits out of the ring cira 85-88, he got it through being the most amazing heavyweight since Ali. If this weren't true then why didn't Lewis or Holmes get the same adulation or media (inside the sport aswell) attention. Anyway I digress back to Tyson v Lewis (and don't wanna argue this one again! ;D)
No doubt you are a fanatic and have watched hundreds of fights, but trust me it just isn't the same.
I wouldn't try to argue with Scrap about the sixties - coz although I have seen hundreds of fights, I wasn't there.
Like I said not a dig, but this where people are coming from when they mention age
I haven't seen you around much lately Wacko. Good to see you back. Have a CC.Quote:
Originally Posted by wacko3205
THe WBC wanted him to fight either McCall or Ruiz, I am surprise the Golata fight got made. I think it is the easier of the three.
Dan Rafael Reported that Showtime has already shot down a fight with Golota, but have approved a fight with McCline. Don King is currently trying work out a deal.
....McCline is a bum....Golota or Rahman would be better
No Golota would not be better. Rahman might but not Golota. McCline may not be much but Golota is NOTHING.
Golota would have whipped Sam Peter's ass
No.... Golota would have knocked Peter on his ass early in the fight, and then as soon as Peter got back up and showed he wasn't going to quit, Golota would've folded and fallen apart, as always.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lyle
.
....Andrew only folds when he's nailed in the first few rounds or when he let's his polish out and quits.
Golota would have had Sam in trouble and been able to close it out because he hits harder than McCline.
Since the Golota and Rahman options weren't used up why didn't Rahman and Golota fight each other??? That would be a very good fight for ESPN to show....put a couple young guys on the undercard, it would be great.
I always wanted Golota and Rahman to be good enough to challenge for titles and give Holyfield, Tyson, Lewis, and Bowe runs for their money. Golota was just mental and Rahman never was active enough or consistant.
I thought Rahman could be the American version of Frank Bruno and I thought Golota could be just a good solid European fighter and he was when he was on his game but when it comes to title shots he's horrible
I don't cheer for the guys but I always wanted them to do well so that there would be some depth at heavyweight
And what makes you think these scenarios wouldn't have played out against Peter?Quote:
Originally Posted by Lyle
Golota knocked down Michael Grant twice (a far lesser fighter than Peter) in the first round, and then Golota completly folded simply because Grant got up and kept fighting.
He would have low blowed him and then fallen apart ;DQuote:
Originally Posted by SweetPea