when I said beautiful attack, I mean counter attack with body shots from time to time.
VD is right? He said Donaire never went to the body.and he is still right? what a laughing stock....
Printable View
when I said beautiful attack, I mean counter attack with body shots from time to time.
VD is right? He said Donaire never went to the body.and he is still right? what a laughing stock....
Maybe he went to the body, but he did no damage, so what was the point. The fact is if Arce fights nonito, Arce will be much more effective to the body than what donaire is. Laughing stockl is saying Donaire is good to the body cos he is clearly not.Quote:
Originally Posted by brucelee
I just don't know why VD keeps on pounding me and later finding himself in deep trouble defending his accusations. can you keep your accusations, VD, to yourself and maybe watch the fight again or at least try to understand what I write?
Yes Violent was right. For anybody to claim Donaire\\\'s body attack is has affective as Arce\\\'s is down right foolish.Quote:
Originally Posted by brucelee
"Donaire is the smarter fighter between the two. Donaire knows how to beautifully attack the body based on his fight with Darchinyan." That's what I said. I did not say Donaire was so effective in body shots. To make it clear, I said he is smart to make those beautiful combinations. Arce is my man. Have you not noticed my prior post?
RottenApple, are you reading correctly? Did I say that Donaire's body attack is as effective as Arce? Whew.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rotten Apple
It's easy to pound you. You leave yourself open with ignorant comments. You said Pac had no trouble with Sanchez yet one judge had Sanchez winning and the other had it a draw. You say Donaire has a great body attack, yet he's never shown it. Yet set yourself up and you don't have the knowledge to back yourself up. Your an easy mark.Quote:
Originally Posted by brucelee
What the fuck? U say Donaire knows how to beautifully attack the body, then us say he is not so effective in body shots....Quote:
Originally Posted by brucelee
What is the difference?
Brucelee could start an arguement in a empty room ;D
And still lose itQuote:
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
OKay. please read all the comments I quoted. I simply agreed to Pacstraight regarding the unleashing of body shots to weaken Vic. That was beautiful body attack with combination of EFFECTIVE left hook and shots to the face. That was beautiful.The body shots may not be effective in terms of power but that was beautiful in terms of counter punching.Quote:
Originally Posted by brucelee
hahaha. I simply can not understand why you ICB of all people could not understand what I mean. You were supposed to be good in boxing.
ICB, are you that mad at me that you would agree to whatever accusations hurled at me?
VD, are you still bent on debating that Agapito's style was great or good? Coz, if you say so, I will agree with you that Golota's style is good.... and that low blow is a good boxing strategy.
I haven't read any of your posts except little bits of it there not worth my time because most of the time you either comment on fighters you haven't seen or fights you haven't seen.Quote:
Originally Posted by brucelee
Your right on the knowledge part. He seems to be having a real hard time backing up what he says. Or making any sense. The funny part is that he actually think he doesQuote:
Originally Posted by Violent Demise