Re: Mayweather is better than Ali ????
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fenster
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fenster
Mayweather didn't CLEARLY beat Oscar.
I had Mayweather winning - slightly more comfortably than others but
on the night (which is the important part, it's easy to see things different with multiple viewings) a case could be made for Oscar winning rounds because he was always competitive.
Thats why so many people saw it as such as close fight.
Yes he did its just alot of people were fooled by those meaningless flurries by Oscar De La Hoya i had Mayweather winning by 3 rounds.
I probably had it about the same BUT people I was watching the fight with, and as NUMEROUS people on this forum and the rest of the planet have shown saw it different.
It doesn't make them wrong.
Did you watch it LIVE?
No but i did download the fight the next day without knowing the result so it was basically the same as watching it live.
Re: Mayweather is better than Ali ????
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Quote:
Originally Posted by leftylee
http://www.sneakerfiles.com/wp-conte...ing-shoe-1.jpg
To big to post apparantly and Mayweather was rocked in the last by 3 hooks big wow he landed more but De La Hoya's had a bigger effect and haven't you got to beat the champ impressively and push the fight?? mayweather didn't do any of those two and the scorecards reflect how close it was.
See i don't get this at all why do you have to be aggressor to take the champs title ??
Dunno maybe to push the champ and to force him to work to keep the belt. ::**
Re: Mayweather is better than Ali ????
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fenster
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fenster
Mayweather didn't CLEARLY beat Oscar.
I had Mayweather winning - slightly more comfortably than others but
on the night (which is the important part, it's easy to see things different with multiple viewings) a case could be made for Oscar winning rounds because he was always competitive.
Thats why so many people saw it as such as close fight.
Yes he did its just alot of people were fooled by those meaningless flurries by Oscar De La Hoya i had Mayweather winning by 3 rounds.
I probably had it about the same BUT people I was watching the fight with, and as NUMEROUS people on this forum and the rest of the planet have shown saw it different.
It doesn't make them wrong.
Did you watch it LIVE?
No but i did download the fight the next day without knowing the result so it was basically the same as watching it live.
You sure you didn't know the result?
So you defintely wasn't here following Wacksters RD-By-Rd or anything?
Re: Mayweather is better than Ali ????
Quote:
Originally Posted by leftylee
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Quote:
Originally Posted by leftylee
http://www.sneakerfiles.com/wp-conte...ing-shoe-1.jpg
To big to post apparantly and Mayweather was rocked in the last by 3 hooks big wow he landed more but De La Hoya's had a bigger effect and haven't you got to beat the champ impressively and push the fight?? mayweather didn't do any of those two and the scorecards reflect how close it was.
See i don't get this at all why do you have to be aggressor to take the champs title ??
Dunno maybe to push the champ and to force him to work to keep the belt. ::**
Why though ?? why can't you just outbox your opponent like Mayweather did with Oscar De La Hoya ?? why does Mayweather have to be aggressor when he can outbox Oscar De La Hoya ??
Re: Mayweather is better than Ali ????
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fenster
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fenster
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fenster
Mayweather didn't CLEARLY beat Oscar.
I had Mayweather winning - slightly more comfortably than others but
on the night (which is the important part, it's easy to see things different with multiple viewings) a case could be made for Oscar winning rounds because he was always competitive.
Thats why so many people saw it as such as close fight.
Yes he did its just alot of people were fooled by those meaningless flurries by Oscar De La Hoya i had Mayweather winning by 3 rounds.
I probably had it about the same BUT people I was watching the fight with, and as NUMEROUS people on this forum and the rest of the planet have shown saw it different.
It doesn't make them wrong.
Did you watch it LIVE?
No but i did download the fight the next day without knowing the result so it was basically the same as watching it live.
You sure you didn't know the result?
So you defintely wasn't here following Wacksters RD-By-Rd or anything?
Nope.
Re: Mayweather is better than Ali ????
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Quote:
Originally Posted by leftylee
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Quote:
Originally Posted by leftylee
http://www.sneakerfiles.com/wp-conte...ing-shoe-1.jpg
To big to post apparantly and Mayweather was rocked in the last by 3 hooks big wow he landed more but De La Hoya's had a bigger effect and haven't you got to beat the champ impressively and push the fight?? mayweather didn't do any of those two and the scorecards reflect how close it was.
See i don't get this at all why do you have to be aggressor to take the champs title ??
Dunno maybe to push the champ and to force him to work to keep the belt. ::**
Why though ?? why can't you just outbox your opponent like Mayweather did with Oscar De La Hoya ?? why does Mayweather have to be aggressor when he can outbox Oscar De La Hoya ??
Outbox him, not for the full 12 but again his punches had no effect and Oscar came back with crisp punches.
Re: Mayweather is better than Ali ????
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fenster
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fenster
Mayweather didn't CLEARLY beat Oscar.
I had Mayweather winning - slightly more comfortably than others but
on the night (which is the important part, it's easy to see things different with multiple viewings) a case could be made for Oscar winning rounds because he was always competitive.
Thats why so many people saw it as such as close fight.
Yes he did its just alot of people were fooled by those meaningless flurries by Oscar De La Hoya i had Mayweather winning by 3 rounds.
I probably had it about the same BUT people I was watching the fight with, and as NUMEROUS people on this forum and the rest of the planet have shown saw it different.
It doesn't make them wrong.
Did you watch it LIVE?
No but i did download the fight the next day without knowing the result so it was basically the same as watching it live.
Now see...I saw it live...& by the 6th round I knew that Oscar was just wasting his time.
He did throw a lot of meaningless flurries & the pro-Oscar crowd was seething.
Anytime Oscar threw anything...& I mean ANYTHING...they were holding their breath for a stoppage. The funny thing is that everyone was on their feet screaming for Oscar & then all you heard were "Ooooooooooooh...a man...Oscar no!" or some shit like "Come on Oscar whoop his little 'racial slur' ass!" & then it was followed up by another... "Ooooooooooooh...a man...Oscar no!" as Floyd countered him & popped him with shots on the inside.
My brother was texting me feverously wanting to get see who I had winning because it was so hard to figure listening to the commentary & watching the bout on PPV.
It was pretty damned crystal during the bout.
Sure Oscar had his moments...but they all do with Floyd for about the first 6 or 7 rounds & then it's done.
Re: Mayweather is better than Ali ????
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fenster
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fenster
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fenster
Mayweather didn't CLEARLY beat Oscar.
I had Mayweather winning - slightly more comfortably than others but
on the night (which is the important part, it's easy to see things different with multiple viewings) a case could be made for Oscar winning rounds because he was always competitive.
Thats why so many people saw it as such as close fight.
Yes he did its just alot of people were fooled by those meaningless flurries by Oscar De La Hoya i had Mayweather winning by 3 rounds.
I probably had it about the same BUT people I was watching the fight with, and as NUMEROUS people on this forum and the rest of the planet have shown saw it different.
It doesn't make them wrong.
Did you watch it LIVE?
No but i did download the fight the next day without knowing the result so it was basically the same as watching it live.
You sure you didn't know the result?
So you defintely wasn't here following Wacksters RD-By-Rd or anything?
Nope.
I hate to be the "glove don't fit" tie breaker for Ice...but nope he wasn't ...because I was in Vegas, babe...didn't pull the shift on that DRBR.
Re: Mayweather is better than Ali ????
Quote:
Originally Posted by wacko3205
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fenster
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fenster
Mayweather didn't CLEARLY beat Oscar.
I had Mayweather winning - slightly more comfortably than others but
on the night (which is the important part, it's easy to see things different with multiple viewings) a case could be made for Oscar winning rounds because he was always competitive.
Thats why so many people saw it as such as close fight.
Yes he did its just alot of people were fooled by those meaningless flurries by Oscar De La Hoya i had Mayweather winning by 3 rounds.
I probably had it about the same BUT people I was watching the fight with, and as NUMEROUS people on this forum and the rest of the planet have shown saw it different.
It doesn't make them wrong.
Did you watch it LIVE?
No but i did download the fight the next day without knowing the result so it was basically the same as watching it live.
Now see...I saw it live...& by the 6th round I knew that Oscar was just wasting his time.
He did throw a lot of meaningless flurries & the pro-Oscar crowd was seething.
Anytime Oscar threw anything...& I mean ANYTHING...they were holding their breath for a stoppage. The funny thing is that everyone was on their feet screaming for Oscar & then all you heard were "Ooooooooooooh...a man...Oscar no!" or some S*** like "Come on Oscar whoop his little 'racial slur' a**!" & then it was followed up by another... "Ooooooooooooh...a man...Oscar no!" as Floyd countered him & popped him with shots on the inside.
My brother was texting me feverously wanting to get see who I had winning because it was so hard to figure listening to the commentary & watching the bout on PPV.
It was pretty damned crystal during the bout.
Sure Oscar had his moments...but they all do with Floyd for about the first 6 or 7 rounds & then it's done.
Thats pretty much spot on Wacko cc.
Re: Mayweather is better than Ali ????
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Why though ?? why can't you just outbox your opponent like Mayweather did with Oscar De La Hoya ?? why does Mayweather have to be aggressor when he can outbox Oscar De La Hoya ??
If being an aggressor is a prerequisite to greatness or championship pedigree, what made Willie Pep an ATG? What made Pernell Whitaker an ATG?
What is fantastic about sports is that there are many ways to "get it done" .
Barry Sanders was great. He ran around people.
Earl Campbell was great. He ran through people.
Re: Mayweather is better than Ali ????
Quote:
Originally Posted by DIOS DOMINICANO
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Why though ?? why can't you just outbox your opponent like Mayweather did with Oscar De La Hoya ?? why does Mayweather have to be aggressor when he can outbox Oscar De La Hoya ??
If being an aggressor is a prerequisite to greatness or championship pedigree, what made Willie Pep an ATG? What made Pernell Whitaker an ATG?
What is fantastic about sports is that there are many ways to "get it done" .
Barry Sanders was great. He ran around people.
Earl Campbell was great. He ran through people.
Totally agree great points cc.
Re: Mayweather is better than Ali ????
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fenster
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fenster
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fenster
Mayweather didn't CLEARLY beat Oscar.
I had Mayweather winning - slightly more comfortably than others but
on the night (which is the important part, it's easy to see things different with multiple viewings) a case could be made for Oscar winning rounds because he was always competitive.
Thats why so many people saw it as such as close fight.
Yes he did its just alot of people were fooled by those meaningless flurries by Oscar De La Hoya i had Mayweather winning by 3 rounds.
I probably had it about the same BUT people I was watching the fight with, and as NUMEROUS people on this forum and the rest of the planet have shown saw it different.
It doesn't make them wrong.
Did you watch it LIVE?
No but i did download the fight the next day without knowing the result so it was basically the same as watching it live.
You sure you didn't know the result?
So you defintely wasn't here following Wacksters RD-By-Rd or anything?
Nope.
What!?! Thought you was a boxing fan, Ice?
Your favourite fighter, Floyd, is in one of the biggest fights EVER and you was a sleep?
???
Re: Mayweather is better than Ali ????
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fenster
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fenster
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fenster
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fenster
Mayweather didn't CLEARLY beat Oscar.
I had Mayweather winning - slightly more comfortably than others but
on the night (which is the important part, it's easy to see things different with multiple viewings) a case could be made for Oscar winning rounds because he was always competitive.
Thats why so many people saw it as such as close fight.
Yes he did its just alot of people were fooled by those meaningless flurries by Oscar De La Hoya i had Mayweather winning by 3 rounds.
I probably had it about the same BUT people I was watching the fight with, and as NUMEROUS people on this forum and the rest of the planet have shown saw it different.
It doesn't make them wrong.
Did you watch it LIVE?
No but i did download the fight the next day without knowing the result so it was basically the same as watching it live.
You sure you didn't know the result?
So you defintely wasn't here following Wacksters RD-By-Rd or anything?
Nope.
What!?! Thought you was a boxing fan, Ice?
Your favourite fighter, Floyd, is in one of the biggest fights EVER and you was a sleep?
???
Read Wacko's quote ;)
Re: Mayweather is better than Ali ????
Quote:
Originally Posted by wacko3205
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fenster
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fenster
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fenster
Mayweather didn't CLEARLY beat Oscar.
I had Mayweather winning - slightly more comfortably than others but
on the night (which is the important part, it's easy to see things different with multiple viewings) a case could be made for Oscar winning rounds because he was always competitive.
Thats why so many people saw it as such as close fight.
Yes he did its just alot of people were fooled by those meaningless flurries by Oscar De La Hoya i had Mayweather winning by 3 rounds.
I probably had it about the same BUT people I was watching the fight with, and as NUMEROUS people on this forum and the rest of the planet have shown saw it different.
It doesn't make them wrong.
Did you watch it LIVE?
No but i did download the fight the next day without knowing the result so it was basically the same as watching it live.
You sure you didn't know the result?
So you defintely wasn't here following Wacksters RD-By-Rd or anything?
Nope.
I hate to be the "glove don't fit" tie breaker for Ice...but nope he wasn't ...because I was in Vegas, babe...didn't pull the shift on that DRBR.
ahahaaa ;D
the "glove don't fit"
I like it.
Re: Mayweather is better than Ali ????
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fenster
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fenster
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fenster
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fenster
Mayweather didn't CLEARLY beat Oscar.
I had Mayweather winning - slightly more comfortably than others but
on the night (which is the important part, it's easy to see things different with multiple viewings) a case could be made for Oscar winning rounds because he was always competitive.
Thats why so many people saw it as such as close fight.
Yes he did its just alot of people were fooled by those meaningless flurries by Oscar De La Hoya i had Mayweather winning by 3 rounds.
I probably had it about the same BUT people I was watching the fight with, and as NUMEROUS people on this forum and the rest of the planet have shown saw it different.
It doesn't make them wrong.
Did you watch it LIVE?
No but i did download the fight the next day without knowing the result so it was basically the same as watching it live.
You sure you didn't know the result?
So you defintely wasn't here following Wacksters RD-By-Rd or anything?
Nope.
What!?! Thought you was a boxing fan, Ice?
Your favourite fighter, Floyd, is in one of the biggest fights EVER and you was a sleep?
???
Read Wacko's quote ;)
You was sleeping? ???
