Re: Tito vs Hearns at Welterweight
Quote:
Originally Posted by hitmandonny
I dare you to show me a post written by me where i call Tito chinny!
Unrelated question; May i ask you, how do you rate Fernando Vargas as a puncher?
Good, but certainly not devastating? He wobbled Tito a number of times. However I feel that this is not as a result of Tito's lack of durability but moreso a result of his limited defense.
The same limited defense which would be exploited by the 6'2'' Tommy Hearns who would find Tito's skull with that Right cross. The right cross that felled Duran, Cuevas and countless others. It is irrelevant that Tito had a decent to good chin. It is an inevitable scientific equation. The human skull suffers the impact of a punch of that force enough times and the brain willorder the body into recovery mode. KO.
Hey you where the only one answering the post but not all comments where directed at you. I respect your opinion as I know you respect mine it's all cool
Re: Tito vs Hearns at Welterweight
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daxx Kahn
Quote:
Originally Posted by Puya
no one would KO Tito @ WW. It would be a hard fight but that would be it. They will both respect each other.
Tito's fall went to test waters out of his league(160) and even so he did pretty good.
Tommy is one of the great but at WW so was TITO.
ANd Tell me how would Tommy would have done against a prime ODLH?
Tommy was not just any welterweight...his power at WW was damn freightning...not 147lb man should be able to hit that hard....his speed was also way above the average welterweights....plus even though he is known for power Tommy was a master boxer....I just don't see Tito beating him....
nither I but as easy people here call it I don't believe
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Rookie Fan
There is no doubt that in a one to one match up. Hearns could beat any WW in any era. Yes that includes Robbinson, Armstrong and all those other greats. He would've beaten Leonard if it had been a 12 round fight.
But you also have to remember that Tito at WW was of the same pedigree (despite what one of the posters said). He, like Hearns, was a monster at that weight. His punching power at the time was at the very least comparable to Hearns. Not to mention he never lossed a fight at WW so it is hard to go against him. The only man to give him a close fight fought in a way that Hearns would never fight so we can't use that against Tito.
Yes, Hearns would most likely beat Tito. Everything that Tito had, Hearns had more of it. He was bigger and even more powerfull. But anybody that sais Hearns would just blow through Trinidad like a knife through hot butter is just fooling themselves. Tito would make it a fight all through to the end. And if there is one thing that we can all agree on is that Tito had much better stamina than Hearns, which means the further it went, the more likely Tito would win.
As I say about any fighter. If you plan on beating Tito. You better bring your A game and you better stick to it for as long as the fight lasts. One slip up and he will make you pay.
That's all I'm trying to say but this guys used the correct words
Re: Tito vs Hearns at Welterweight
Re: Tito vs Hearns at Welterweight
They both had great power at WW...but Hearns has to be p4p one of the greatest punchers in the history of the sport. As far as all around skill...Tommy was a much better boxer. He had a tremendous jab. His problem was that he could easily be lulled into a brawl and abandon using his great all around skill. Both of them had iffy chins...but i just have a hard time betting against Hearns at Welterweight.
Re: Tito vs Hearns at Welterweight
I think with Tito going down frequently in his fights. I would see a quick K.O. for Hearns. Withing 3 rounds.Anothe rgood question would be if Oscar fought Hearns I believe Oscar would probably stop him late like Ray Leonard did.
Re: Tito vs Hearns at Welterweight
IT's funny how much people rate Tito Low after his fight with B-hop at 160
Re: Tito vs Hearns at Welterweight
Quote:
Originally Posted by Puya
IT's funny how much people rate Tito Low fater his fight with B-hop at 160
I think the comment's are fair bro, Tito was down a lot in the early rounds, and if Hearns put him on the canvas he wouldn't get up. I respect Tito he is great fighter and took a hell of a beating against Hopkins while being way above his weight class. But imo Hearns is a little too much for Tito but thats nothing to be ashamed of because Hearns is too much for most Welterweights.
Re: Tito vs Hearns at Welterweight
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ricardo "Finito" Lopez
Quote:
Originally Posted by Puya
IT's funny how much people rate Tito Low fater his fight with B-hop at 160
I think the comment's are fair bro, Tito was down a lot in the early rounds, and if Hearns put him on the canvas he wouldn't get up. I respect Tito he is great fighter and took a hell of a beating against Hopkins while being way above his weight class. But imo Hearns is a little too much for Tito but thats nothing to be ashamed of because Hearns is too much for most Welterweights.
Tito as well was too much for most Welterweights with mad power too. So you see at this time both fighters had their legacy at 147 and is written in the history books as the baddest MOFOS of the WW.
So for me it would have been a classic fight without rating any of them low. It's a shame how people forgets TITO's legacy at 147 just because he got outclassed by no other than B-Hop at 160.
Re: Tito vs Hearns at Welterweight
Quote:
Originally Posted by Puya
IT's funny how much people rate Tito Low after his fight with B-hop at 160
Has nothing to do with Tito losing to Hopkins...More or less has to do with Hearns just being that good....
Re: Tito vs Hearns at Welterweight
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daxx Kahn
Quote:
Originally Posted by Puya
IT's funny how much people rate Tito Low after his fight with B-hop at 160
Has nothing to do with Tito losing to Hopkins...More or less has to do with Hearns just being that good....
I reate them equally the same this is the reason why most boxing fans think of this matchup
Re: Tito vs Hearns at Welterweight
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al
Hearns TKO round 2
Oh man you dont know nothing about boxing,, tko in 2nd round?? are you kidding?? No American or Mexican will beat TiTo,, carribeans have a little chance
Re: Tito vs Hearns at Welterweight
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nejo
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al
Hearns TKO round 2
Oh man you dont know nothing about boxing,, tko in 2nd round?? are you kidding?? No American or Mexican will beat TiTo,, carribeans have a little chance
Oh Man YOU KNOW NOTHING ABOUT BOXING!!!!
Seeing how Trinidada was beaten by 2 Americans and KO'd once :o
GET OUT!!!!
Re: Tito vs Hearns at Welterweight
Quote:
Originally Posted by Puya
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daxx Kahn
Quote:
Originally Posted by Puya
no one would KO Tito @ WW. It would be a hard fight but that would be it. They will both respect each other.
Tito's fall went to test waters out of his league(160) and even so he did pretty good.
Tommy is one of the great but at WW so was TITO.
ANd Tell me how would Tommy would have done against a prime ODLH?
Tommy was not just any welterweight...his power at WW was damn freightning...not 147lb man should be able to hit that hard....his speed was also way above the average welterweights....plus even though he is known for power Tommy was a master boxer....I just don't see Tito beating him....
nither I but as easy people here call it I don't believe
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Rookie Fan
There is no doubt that in a one to one match up. Hearns could beat any WW in any era. Yes that includes Robbinson, Armstrong and all those other greats. He would've beaten Leonard if it had been a 12 round fight.
But you also have to remember that Tito at WW was of the same pedigree (despite what one of the posters said). He, like Hearns, was a monster at that weight. His punching power at the time was at the very least comparable to Hearns. Not to mention he never lossed a fight at WW so it is hard to go against him. The only man to give him a close fight fought in a way that Hearns would never fight so we can't use that against Tito.
Yes, Hearns would most likely beat Tito. Everything that Tito had, Hearns had more of it. He was bigger and even more powerfull. But anybody that sais Hearns would just blow through Trinidad like a knife through hot butter is just fooling themselves. Tito would make it a fight all through to the end. And if there is one thing that we can all agree on is that Tito had much better stamina than Hearns, which means the further it went, the more likely Tito would win.
As I say about any fighter. If you plan on beating Tito. You better bring your A game and you better stick to it for as long as the fight lasts. One slip up and he will make you pay.
That's all I'm trying to say but this guys used the correct words
Hearns and "tito" weren't in the same league. And from what I can see you agree.
I'd rather watch tito - Benitez. Watch tito hit air all night long.
Re: Tito vs Hearns at Welterweight
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nejo
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al
Hearns TKO round 2
Oh man you dont know nothing about boxing,, tko in 2nd round?? are you kidding?? No American or Mexican will beat TiTo,, carribeans have a little chance
You claim he knows nothing about boxing.
You then continue by judging potential boxing contests by using countries of origin as a measure of a fighter's worth...
Sad Click. Poor Posting.
Re: Tito vs Hearns at Welterweight
First I am gonna say Hearns, Rd4. Not much different with a few other guys. Tito, out of his range, was not effective (like the way DLH worked him over).
Hearns was so dangerous inside the first 5 rounds, if you couldn't counter and stop him from getting off 100+ knockout intended punches a round... You weren't surviving. And Tito didn't really beat anyone who was a more natural heavier opponents (eg. Hopkins). Let's not forget Hearns went all the way up to Cruiserweight.
also:
Quote:
Yeah, a while back, I think I started a thread like this also. Its a great match, but you gotta go with Hearns. He had equal or greater power to Tito, AND was a so much better boxer. Not to mention his height and reach, he could just stay on the outside and pick Tito apart and do the same to Trinidad as he did to the shorter Duran.
I don't think Hearns stayed on the outside and picked Duran apart. as Far as I could see he swung like a bushwhacker on FFW and had him hurt within a minute and out cold within 4 minutes.
