Is there anyone without a padded record?

Although he also has a soft beginning (high school gyms and all), I would still recommend Marvelous Marvin Hagler for not being padded.
If you excuse his late 70's fights (which he had to take b/c no one would fight him for their title), he was fighting all top 10's until his disgusted end.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by eagle

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ArawakWarria

I wanted to say Holyfield, but his record has a few soft touches in their at both ends...

Great post! It has me going through my list of tough guys...

---

Holyfield is probably the closest thing to a guy u cannot accuse of having a padded record. Mainly because nearly all his toughest opponents were way bigger than him. Good pick up mate.

---

Thx for the big up... As I see it, he fought for the world title within his first twelve fights, unified the division, moved up in weight, stayed top 10 his whole career, won the title 4 times and only got soft when his self proclaimed 'arm problem' earned him all of those losses.

Damn... he just fought for the 'title' last year!!!

stop reading after i read the comment about PBF in the first post.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The Boxer

stop reading after i read the comment about PBF in the first post.

---

Well mate if u'd read the rest u would have realised that all those lines are just things i've heard, and i also wrote that i dont believe any of them.

So u got entirely the wrong impression and just looked silly.

Is there anyone without a padded record?

Of course there is... the fighters that are put in the ring agaings fighters with padded records... hehe.

A lot of mexican fighters do not get to start out with a padded record. That's why the first time you hear about them, they already have 3 losses.