Quote:
Originally Posted by Majesty
How do you decide which fighters you're gonna obsessively hate or love and go on and on and on and on about? Is there a system or is it a random thing? Its kind of a random thing with me.
Printable View
Quote:
Originally Posted by Majesty
How do you decide which fighters you're gonna obsessively hate or love and go on and on and on and on about? Is there a system or is it a random thing? Its kind of a random thing with me.
1. Zab Judah or anyone who's faced Zab Judah is 10 times better then you say they are. As is Zahir Raheem.Quote:
Originally Posted by OumaFanQuote:
Originally Posted by Majesty
How do you decide which fighters you're gonna obsessively hate or love and go on and on and on and on about? Is there a system or is it a random thing? Its kind of a random thing with me.
Just look at the Jaime Rangel fight, and look at how well Rangel has done against guys like Timothy Bradley, Emmanuel Augustus. Just goes to show that if Zab had fought everyone else with the same focus that he had against Rangel......Pineda would have gotten fucked up Brooklyn style son.
You know I was just thinking, remember the Derrick Gainer-JMM fight and the way Gainer exposed JMM's lack of ability coming forward. That was great. So under appreciated.
I'm a Cotto fan, he's even in my signature but what's his excuse for not fighting Clottey?
;)
True, if Floyd did that the haters would be screaming and calling him a ducker and people just want to see Floyd lose and and and and and.........
and Zab was hurt against Pineda and I knew Baldomir was a bad stylistic matchup for Zab.
Now I will attempt to redirect the conversation.
Did I ever tell you about that whole Augustus - Vester misunderstanding?Quote:
Originally Posted by OumaFan
Back on topic....David Haye is a little too confident to never have fought any top rated heavyweights.
IMO Skelton would be a good welcome to the division fight....but a little more dangerous than let's say Audley Harrison which is the level of fighter he should be gunning for.
If Haye fights anyone like Ruiz or Virchis then he's going to have some trouble
must say that hes done the right thing. I mean he would just KO Skelton easy and pocket a easy nights work....fresh to see a fighter with ambition to be honest!! hope he makes movements in the heavies although i really cant even predict how well i think he will do. Its a hard one with Haye IMO.
I don't have a system. Some fighters I like some fighters I don't like any boxing fan.Quote:
Originally Posted by OumaFanQuote:
Originally Posted by Majesty
How do you decide which fighters you're gonna obsessively hate or love and go on and on and on and on about? Is there a system or is it a random thing? Its kind of a random thing with me.
I think Haye is good, but i'm not gonna pole jock on him just because he is a knockout hitter.
Just because I have an negative opinion about a certain thing the boxer does doesnt mean I'm gonna bias myself if I think he is gonna win or lose. I appreciate all fighters but when people talk up themselves before they've accomplished anything at that weight then I can not like them. Sure if he proves himself thats good. But he has a long way to go in the heavyweight division before he acts like he's calling the shots.
But there's no criteria to who and who I don't like, different strokes for different folks. I may think a boxer is good but that doesn't make me a fan. So I speak openly what I think about them. I don't mind what he said about Warren, I just mind that he acts like he calls the shots at heavyweight already when he hasn't done anything. No one else seems to want to focus on "what" i was saying as to who I was saying it about.
But did that answer your question?
He's just trying to create excitement, as far as calling out Wlad and all that.Quote:
Originally Posted by MajestyI don't have a system. Some fighters I like some fighters I don't like any boxing fan.Quote:
Originally Posted by OumaFanQuote:
Originally Posted by Majesty
How do you decide which fighters you're gonna obsessively hate or love and go on and on and on and on about? Is there a system or is it a random thing? Its kind of a random thing with me.
I think Haye is good, but i'm not gonna pole jock on him just because he is a knockout hitter.
Just because I have an negative opinion about a certain thing the boxer does doesnt mean I'm gonna bias myself if I think he is gonna win or lose. I appreciate all fighters but when people talk up themselves before they've accomplished anything at that weight then I can not like them. Sure if he proves himself thats good. But he has a long way to go in the heavyweight division before he acts like he's calling the shots.
But there's no criteria to who and who I don't like, different strokes for different folks. I may think a boxer is good but that doesn't make me a fan. So I speak openly what I think about them. I don't mind what he said about Warren, I just mind that he acts like he calls the shots at heavyweight already when he hasn't done anything. No one else seems to want to focus on "what" i was saying as to who I was saying it about.
But did that answer your question?
Nothing wrong with creating some excitement and noise in a pitifully boring heavyweight division is there?
As far as who you like, I wasn't being too serious, I could care less who you or anybody likes or dislikes on here.