Re: One-Dimensional fighters.
People what about the very famous one.. THE PACMAN.. ;D
He is branded all the time as a one-dimensional freak.. But still he is too much for the so called HOF fighters..
Re: One-Dimensional fighters.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
LEGION
Does Tye Fields count?
Yes. He counts to 10 when he fights a top 30 heavyweight.;D
Re: One-Dimensional fighters.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ICB
Quote:
Originally Posted by
LEGION
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ICB
Clinton Woods
Librado Andrade
Kelly Pavlik
Antonio Margarito
I almost named the last 3 names you wrote down, but I'm a coward and didn't feel like getting bashed;D
Andrade has improved somewhat; he moves his head a bit better before he gets punched on it:p
To be honest i like Andrade, Pavlik, Margarito, but they are one dimensional IMO, but they are very good at what they do and they will take some beating.
Great point ,when you are a master of your one dimension in fighting your sometimes unbeatable.
Like whats his face from Germany who retired unbeaten :rolleyes: .
Thats why I hate to watch Vic darchinian oh and Spaddafora too for that matter, no 1 and 2 right there; cause I can see ways to beat them easily and get frustrated that so called professional boxers and there trainers and corner men can't.
Re: One-Dimensional fighters.
Power can make up for flaws even more so with the one hit and your out kind of fighters Andre its easier to watch then to do.
Re: One-Dimensional fighters.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
OumaFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
DAWGSWIN
I think you could make a shorter list of multi-dimensional fighters.
Probably so.
"One dimensional" has just become a catch phrase to describe pressure fighters really.
Yeah agreed . I think of one dimensional in the true sence as being strong on only one side of the body or one side of the mind operating one side better and using only that one side to fight from; standing side on nearly and having your whole style of fighting based on that strength/ really / weakness.
Re: One-Dimensional fighters.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mr140
Power can make up for flaws even more so with the one hit and your out kind of fighters Andre its easier to watch then to do.
Sure, but what fuks me over is fighters who dont even try any angles and stand right in front of these types of fighters trying the same thing for 36 miniutes there is no excuse for that.
Re: One-Dimensional fighters.
edwin valero
ponce de leon
david diaz
Re: One-Dimensional fighters.
Paulie Malinaggi
Carlos Baldomir
Corey Spinks
Yuri Foreman
Sergio Mora
Tavoris Cloud
Re: One-Dimensional fighters.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
leftylee
Kermit Cintron as well.
I was just about to say Cintron when I saw you beat me to it.
Re: One-Dimensional fighters.
I know that it is supposed to be todays fighters but one of my own heroes comes to mind..... George Foreman was rather one dimensional but his dimension was damned effective and it made him a lethal opponent for anyone back in the day. Barring Ali of course!
Re: One-Dimensional fighters.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ICB
Quote:
Originally Posted by
leftylee
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ICB
Clinton Woods
Librado Andrade
Kelly Pavlik
Antonio Margarito
How is Pavlik one-dimesnional ?
Yeah Margarito is. He just keeps on coming forward throwing shots, that's it.
Kelly Pavlik's offense is basically jab, jab, right hand, rarely varies it and i find him one dimensional. And as someone stated on here its bit playing playing an old game of Knockout Kings where you button mash repeat the same punches and the characters are very robotic etc, which is a good way to describe Pavlik if that makes sense :-\
Yes his right hands are strait. Which is great that he can put that power behind a punch that he looks to push out instead of throw a looping shot that opens up one side of your face making it easier to counter with a hook. The man throws all sorts of punches and from all angels and he is very accurate. He pads punches away alot with his gloves and has a good defense. He comes in strait lines is the only things about him I see.